Hi Mark
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 23:19 -0400, Mark Stosberg wrote:
Over the weekend I built on Ron Savage's start on a Pure Perl HTML parser.
I provide a detailed progress report on my updates here:
http://mark.stosberg.com/blog/2009/04/towards-a-pure-perl-htmlfillinform-61-tests-passing.html
one reason for going through something like google groups is that the
membership can come and go and the mail keeps on going. sometimes, after
a few years, the maintainer[s] of the email list will have gone on to
other things, and will need to be bugged to find the time to fix this
relic
Thanks for the feedback, Michael.
I'm fairly much in agreement with all your points about the mailing list
options.
+ A more common SCM system (not darcs). SVN is popular and tolerable. Git is
nice and fast (and with something like github forking and fixing things
becomes
more a
On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:55:20 -0400
Jesse Erlbaum je...@erlbaum.net wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Jesse Erlbaum je...@erlbaum.net wrote:
Irrational though it may be, I get a much better feeling about something
like Google Code (http://code.google.com) + Google Groups.
This
Hi Michael
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 11:56 -0400, Michael De Soto wrote:
I need some advice from the CGI::App gurus.
Yo don't need to combine the 2 software technologies.
The DNS side of things could be kicked off by CGI input, and could write
its results to a db.
The CGI could query the db, for
What I talked to Mark about this morning was that I think the nature of how
these projects can be supported is changing. There is a clear multiplicity
of features which are useful, beyond just a mailing list. I've used
Sourceforge, but I find it dated and shaky. Irrational though it may
Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Jesse Erlbaum je...@erlbaum.net wrote:
Irrational though it may be, I get a much better feeling about something
like Google Code (http://code.google.com) + Google Groups.
This being said:
