Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-09 Thread RA Jones
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Jaclyn Whitehorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While there is such a thing as over-simplifying, I really don't see why TT can't be covered in a page or two. I personally think that the book should primarily use HTML::Template, since it's (1) integrated, and (2) EASY. At some

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-08 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Johan Kuuse wrote: Plan to mention something about I18N/L10N, generally in web programming and/or particularly in CGI::Application? Definitely! Thanks I don't know how I missed that one. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-08 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Jeff MacDonald wrote: Recently there has been a flourish of writting less code and several best practices, using Class::DBI and the like. Will there be a section on this sort of thing ? [Kick my ass if I missread this anywhere] Given that Class::DBI is a complex system

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-08 Thread Michael Peters
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: The reason I split this into two chapters is that CGI::Apps integration with HTML::Template means you can get an immediate advantage over straight CGI.pm right away. And although I did use Template Toolkit in my last project, to be honest it doesn't seem to have huge

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-08 Thread Rhesa Rozendaal
Michael Peters wrote: Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: So perhaps I should cover HT::Dot in the introductory chapter, and TT and the rest in Ch. 12? I would cover (or mention) TT before HT::Dot. It's much more popular and a staple in the perl community. I know the boook will target people who

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-08 Thread Jaclyn Whitehorn
On Sep 8, 2005, at 6:08 PM, Michael Peters wrote: I would cover (or mention) TT before HT::Dot. It's much more popular and a staple in the perl community. I know the boook will target people who aren't perl programmers, but it's important to let existing perl programmers that we're not

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-07 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Javier Donaire wrote: I would also add a section to run under FastCGI, because it is less memory hungry than mod_perl and easier to set up in shared hosting environments. Ok good suggestion. Great book! Wait till I've written something before deciding :-) -- Jaldhar

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-07 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Jason A. Crome wrote: Why leave testing for the end? Why not strictly leave chapter 13 to optimization, and start indoctrinating people with testing from the beginning? Possibly because, sad to say that's how I usually do it. Though I have seen the error of my ways.

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-07 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Andrew Brosnan wrote: Sounds like the book will focus almost exclusively on running CGIApp as CGI (rather than under mod_perl). For the most part yes. But I would think most developers run under mod_perl, no? If you are going to develop specifically for mod_perl, you

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-07 Thread Michael Graham
If you are going to develop specifically for mod_perl, you should probably be writing handlers and using the full-fledged power of the Apache API. Well, mod_perl is not the simplest persistent Perl environment, but there are times when it's appropriate for running CGI apps, even when those

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-07 Thread Cees Hek
On 9/7/05, Michael Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most CGI::Application based apps should be able to run fine under straight CGI, mod_perl Registry, a simple mod_perl handler, FastCGI, and PersistentPerl (a.k.a. SpeedyCGI). I think a FastCGI plugin for CGIApp is long overdue. It just needs

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-06 Thread Johan Kuuse
Plan to mention something about I18N/L10N, generally in web programming and/or particularly in CGI::Application? Regards, Johan -- Johan Kuuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 6 22:16:24 2005 - Web Archive:

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-05 Thread Jason A. Crome
Why leave testing for the end? Why not strictly leave chapter 13 to optimization, and start indoctrinating people with testing from the beginning? IMHO, the more people are exposed to testing, the more likely they are to understand and use it in their own development. By leaving

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-05 Thread Andrew Brosnan
On 9/4/05 at 7:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas) wrote: A couple of months back we had some discussion on a CGI::Application book. I think I am ready to get started on this. As a first step to making a proposal to a publisher[1] here is a synopsis of the books possible contents.

RE: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-05 Thread Dan Horne
From: Jaldhar H. Vyas A couple of months back we had some discussion on a CGI::Application book. I think I am ready to get started on this. As a first step to making a proposal to a publisher[1] here is a synopsis of the books possible contents. This is just a brain dump so I

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-05 Thread Michael Graham
BTW, is CAF on the CA website? If not, seems like it should be. Thanks for the push! I've added it to the Other Frameworks page: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/cgi-bin/cgi-app/index.cgi?OtherFrameworks It probably should have its own page too - I'll get to that eventually. Michael ---

[cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-04 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
A couple of months back we had some discussion on a CGI::Application book. I think I am ready to get started on this. As a first step to making a proposal to a publisher[1] here is a synopsis of the books possible contents. This is just a brain dump so I appreciate any and all comments,

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-04 Thread Ron Savage
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:02:20 -0500 (CDT), Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: Hi Jaldhar Very nice indeed. I suggest including a discussion of maintaining state, in this sense: o While the CGI script is running, it has local memory, accessed via $self - param(x = $y). When the script exits, this memory is

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-04 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Ron Savage wrote: I suggest including a discussion of maintaining state, in this sense: o While the CGI script is running, it has local memory, accessed via $self - param(x = $y). When the script exits, this memory is lost forever. o The CGI script can save state in

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-04 Thread Sam Tregar
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: Ch 1: Common Gateway Interface What is CGI? Perl good language for CGI. CGI not dead yet. (Advantages over proprietary methods like java, .net) CGI.pm standard for perl CGI programming (with example.) Make sure you know your stuff when you

Re: [cgiapp] RFC: synopsis for CGI::App book

2005-09-04 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Sam Tregar wrote: Make sure you know your stuff when you compare CGI to Java and .NET. There's nothing like a misinformed advocate to damage the reputation of a technology. Why am I worried? Most server-side Java and .Net apps use CGI. Also, Java isn't proprietary in