On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:54:49 -0800
"Josh" wrote:
> Is spam free speech?
>
I think everybody wants to answer NO, but i think it is free speech.
Just because people dont like the message or the person who sent it
doesnt mean the message should be illegal.
Most people arent capable of thinking r
s scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20020101/c0767789/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Glenn McGrath (bug1 at optushome.com.au) wrote:
>
> > (Anyone who compares spamers to NAZI's is seriously deranged, do
> > spammers attempt genocide or anything close ?)
>
> Either that, or he was joking. :)
I think it was a rather subtle invocation of
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 20:30:19 +1100 Glenn McGrath
writes:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:54:49 -0800
> "Josh" wrote:
>
> > Is spam free speech?
> >
>
> I think everybody wants to answer NO, but i think it is free
> speech.
>
> Just because people dont like the message or the person who sent it
> do
My problem is that I cannot retrieve keys. What always comes back is
"Network Error Couldn't retrieve key:" ect. The only reason I asked about
the port is that I thought perhaps that may be the problem. I've typed in
"1" "COM1" "2" "COM2", all with the same results. The place I see the "0" is
o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 03:30, you wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:54:49 -0800
>
> "Josh" wrote:
> > Is spam free speech?
>
> I think everybody wants to answer NO, but i think it is free speech.
I don't mind spam (or any other kind of advertising)
er.com/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20020101/82bfab6b/attachment.pgp>
oject.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20020101/dbb7f2a8/attachment.pgp>
Yep, this is why those opposed to spam tend to start
speaking of fine distinctions, such as that between
unsolicited commercial email (UCE) and non-commercial.
Glenn's on the right track. The difference between ranting
and raving in front of the NY Public Library demanding the
release of Dmitry
Josh wrote:
> Is spam free speech?
No, it's trespassing and computer sabotage.
If any advertiser wants to speak freely, he can put his stuff on a web
page, and then let it be found by search engines and thereby also by
users. Nobody will be forced to look at it, as he can't constitutionally
(or
g'o'tz ohnesorge:
> Josh wrote:
>
> > Is spam free speech?
>
> No, it's trespassing and computer sabotage.
In fact, spamming is best viewed as a sort of contemporary Nazism.
Really.
___
Chat mailing list
Chat at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freene
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 01:32:18 -0600 Mark J Roberts writes:
> g'o'tz ohnesorge:
> > Josh wrote:
> >
> > > Is spam free speech?
> >
> > No, it's trespassing and computer sabotage.
>
> In fact, spamming is best viewed as a sort of contemporary Nazism.
>
> Really.
In my experience Spam is ANY unwa
Happy New Year!! :)
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
