Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Permanent vs Transient

2002-06-12 Thread Timm Murray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 <> > >There we go with the terminology again. Please don't use the word > >"transient" to mean something other than "a node that has set > >transient=true in the freenet.conf or freenet.ini file". Call it > >something else. "Temporary node" would b

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Permanent vs Transient

2002-06-12 Thread Aaron Ingebrigtsen
>From: Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Permanent vs Transient >Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:16:46 -0400 > >Aaron Ingebrigtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > If I have a transi

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Permanent vs Transient

2002-06-11 Thread Greg Wooledge
Aaron Ingebrigtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If I have a transient node, meaning a node that is not on a permanent > internet connection, There we go with the terminology again. Please don't use the word "transient" to mean something other than "a node that has set transient=true in the fre

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Permanent vs Transient

2002-06-11 Thread Aaron Ingebrigtsen
>From: Revenant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [freenet-chat] Re: Permanent vs Transient >Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:28:20 + > >Revenant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> To take the extreme example, a

[freenet-chat] Re: Permanent vs Transient

2002-06-09 Thread Revenant
Revenant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> To take the extreme example, a system based around all transient=20 >> nodes would require greater 'mirroring' of any given piece of data. [...] > I don't understand this part at all. A Freenet with all transient > nodes cannot insert anything at all. No

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: permanent vs transient

2002-06-08 Thread Timm Murray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 08 June 2002 19:51, Greg Wooledge wrote: > Revenant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > To take the extreme example, a system based around all transient > > nodes would require greater 'mirroring' of any given piece of data. > > [...] > > I d

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: permanent vs transient

2002-06-08 Thread Greg Wooledge
Revenant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > To take the extreme example, a system based around all transient > nodes would require greater 'mirroring' of any given piece of data. [...] I don't understand this part at all. A Freenet with all transient nodes cannot insert anything at all. No node w

[freenet-chat] Re: permanent vs transient

2002-06-08 Thread Revenant
>From: David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >..and then Revenant said... > BTW, I didn't realise that Freenet relied so heavily on > permanent nodes. That's kind of a strange focus in as volatile > a setting as the Internet... > Well, yeah, but if all of the nodes are transient how are you supposed > to