>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:32:43 -0600 Timm Murray
> writes:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Saturday 12 January 2002 22:57, you wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:27:01 -0600 Mark J Roberts
> > writes:
> > > > Your "my right to [do some relatively unusual thi
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:32:43 -0600 Timm Murray
writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 12 January 2002 22:57, you wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:27:01 -0600 Mark J Roberts
> writes:
> > > Your "my right to [do some relatively unusual thing] is being
> > > t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 12 January 2002 22:57, you wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:27:01 -0600 Mark J Roberts writes:
> > Your "my right to [do some relatively unusual thing] is being
> > trampled by legislation that is necessary to enforce copyright"
> > argumen
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:27:01 -0600 Mark J Roberts writes:
> Your "my right to [do some relatively unusual thing] is being
> trampled by legislation that is necessary to enforce copyright"
> argument is stupid, and you know it.
Again the Flame War starter strikes with another blast of his incred
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:56:50 -0600 Timm Murray
writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 11 January 2002 11:06, you wrote:
> > Hello, I edited your email for my response, hope you don't mind.
> :)
> >
> > I don't know what this DRM is,
>
> Digital Rights Managemen
f Of Timm Murray
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: chat at freenetproject.org
> Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] terrorism and Freenet
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 11 January 2002 11:06, you wrote:
> > Hello, I edite
must make sure that ALL this type of information is available to
> everyone and take it from there. Thanks Jack.
>
>
>
> ---Original Message---
>
> From: chat at freenetproject.org
> Date: 10 January 2002 06:08:26
> To: chat at freenetproject.org
> Sub
Timm Murray:
> Digital Rights Management. In theory, it stops "pirates" from illicitly
> copied software. In practice, it is likely to stop you from using software
> that was legaly copied (like mp3s you ripped from a CD you already own, or
> Free Software like GNU/Linux).
Your "my right to [
urray
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:49 PM
To: chat at freenetproject.org
Subject: RE: [freenet-chat] terrorism and Freenet
[I called it "black lantern" below, which was a typo. It's really "magic
lantern".]
There a lots of reputable news orginzations that have
eep it quiet". So as
i said we must make sure that ALL this type of information is available to
everyone and take it from there. Thanks Jack.
---Original Message---
From: chat@freenetproject.org
Date: 10 January 2002 06:08:26
To: chat at freenetproject.org
Subject: Re: [freenet-ch
-Original Message-
From: chat-admin at freenetproject.org [mailto:chat-ad...@freenetproject.org]
On Behalf Of Timm Murray
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:57 AM
To: chat at freenetproject.org
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] terrorism and Freenet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 January 2002 11:06, you wrote:
> Hello, I edited your email for my response, hope you don't mind. :)
>
> I don't know what this DRM is,
Digital Rights Management. In theory, it stops "pirates" from illicitly
copied software. In practic
Hello, I edited your email for my response, hope you don't mind. :)
I don't know what this DRM is, and I don't know what this involvement
with the FBI is. And I had no idea that Microsoft had stoped support for
Win98 and 98se. I knew they had stoped for 95, both A and B. Please
give me informat
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:08:00PM -0500, Aaron Guy Davies wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Travis Bemann wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:08:00AM -0700, colbyd wrote:
> > > Does anybody know about the anti-terror legislation (USAPA) and how this
> > > might be used to hassle peer networking? A
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Travis Bemann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:08:00AM -0700, colbyd wrote:
> > Does anybody know about the anti-terror legislation (USAPA) and how this
> > might be used to hassle peer networking? As I read this law and the
> > Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:21:53PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:08:00AM -0700, colbyd wrote:
> > Does anybody know about the anti-terror legislation (USAPA) and how this
> > might be used to hassle peer networking? As I read this law and the
> > Communications Assistance
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:08:00AM -0700, colbyd wrote:
> Does anybody know about the anti-terror legislation (USAPA) and how this
> might be used to hassle peer networking? As I read this law and the
> Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), it seems that
> peer networking is in
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 09:08:00 -0700 colbyd
writes:
> Does anybody know about the anti-terror legislation (USAPA) and how
> this
> might be used to hassle peer networking? As I read this law and the
> Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), it seems
> that
> peer networking is
Does anybody know about the anti-terror legislation (USAPA) and how this
might be used to hassle peer networking? As I read this law and the
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), it seems that
peer networking is in trouble for two main reasons: 1) together, the laws
require tha
19 matches
Mail list logo
