The attached test case works in csi but fails in csc.
Possibly related to optimization options. Compile as:
csc -O3 -clustering -no-argc-checks -no-procedure-checks
-no-bound-checks -no-trace -no-lambda-info -specialize -lfa2
-strict-types -disable-stack-overflow-checks -unsafe
Hi Jörg,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:35:07 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net wrote:
The attached test case works in csi but fails in csc.
Possibly related to optimization options. Compile as:
csc -O3 -clustering -no-argc-checks -no-procedure-checks
-no-bound-checks
Hi Jörg,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:35:07 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net wrote:
The attached test case works in csi but fails in csc.
Possibly related to optimization options. Compile as:
csc -O3 -clustering -no-argc-checks -no-procedure-checks
-no-bound-checks
chicken -version
(c) 2008-2015, The CHICKEN Team
(c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann
Version 4.9.1 (custom)
linux-unix-clang-arm [ dload ptables ]
compiled 2015-06-14 on utilite (Linux)
This is actually git's master/HEAD from a Thursday.
Am 15.06.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Mario Domenech Goulart:
Hi
(tl;dr: don't)
I know, I'm a bit late to this discussion, but let me ask, nay, implore you to
leave things as they are, for the following reasons:
First, nobody really wants to go through each and every tool, figuring out the
command-line parsing, changing (and breaking) everything in the
