On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:14:52PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
[long story about way too complex performance hacks]
I'd have to seriously think about this and whether it's feasible at all.
It may not be worth it, due to the disadvantages I mentioned.
Good news, everyone!
I had another look
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 01:09:23PM +0100, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Micro-optimizations won't give much, as Peter said: the CPS calls are
what's expensive and there is no fast path that one could take. If, for
example one would implement optimistic inlining (as in the Feeley paper),
where one
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 11:40:56PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Peter Bex pe...@more-magic.net wrote:
Hello CHICKEN hackers,
I finally finished integrating the code from the numbers egg into CHICKEN
5!
Wow, nice work.
Thanks, everyone :)
Personally
Hello CHICKEN hackers,
I finally finished integrating the code from the numbers egg into CHICKEN 5!
This is quite a big change, so I decided not to send patches to the list,
instead you can find this work under the numbers-integration branch.
If you were curious and checked it out before, you
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 05:23:11PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
- There is an include file (mini-srfi-1.scm) that holds the
procedures that are currently needed. It is included by several
units, mostly compiler units.
This sounds like the Right Thing. We'll
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:59:13PM -0700, Alexej Magura wrote:
The patch attached adds a binding to /strerror /to
posix-common.scm^* (version 4.9.0.1). The other attachment is the
patched file, to make it easier to merge the changes with upstream.
I've already tested the changes: it compiles
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 07:26:24AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
Attached is a patch that makes these -string procedures consistently
non-foldable. I prefer to be conservative here, per our discussion on
IRC (many moons ago!): this makes it less likely that we'll unwittingly
introduce subtle bugs
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 02:28:27PM +0300, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
Hello All!
I’ve been thinking about an idea to merge module type and inline information
into import libraries for a long time, and, before starting to hack, decided
to ask for opinions in hope to produce useful discussion.
As
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 01:23:41PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
Secondly, for example the numbers egg has an extensive types file
with many hand-written specializations. The nice thing of separating
this file from the import file is that numbers can still be compiled
with, for example, CHICKEN
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:38:24AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
The following script works correctly in csi, but produces a warning in csc:
(use numbers)
(define (foo x) (odd? x))
The output is as follows:
Warning: in toplevel procedure `foo':
(foo.scm:2) in procedure call to
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:37:22PM +0200, Răzvan Rotaru wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to specify the PATH to gcc (in this case mingw) to the
chicken compiler, at runtime? I'm looking for something similar to the
environment variable CHICKEN_PREFIX, which tells the chicken compiler where
it is
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:41:34PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
Dear Chickeneers,
the attached patch fixes a potential buffer overrun in
substring-index[-ci] I ran into today (pun intended). See commit message
for details. I included a regression test but I'm not sure whether it's
ideal
7ce33ef0d76bb23fcd598af965362b12aff124c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:32:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix broken missing file detection in distribution
tarball generator
---
scripts/makedist.scm | 15 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:33:21AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
Hi all,
The attached patch moves foldable binding annotations out of
c-platform.scm and into types.db.
While looking into #986[1], I realized there are currently several
library procedures that are marked foldable when they
statement which is
not allowed in the loop expression position inside a 'for' loop in
standard C. In particular, MSVC compiler considers this a syntax error.
Signed-off-by: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
---
runtime.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:49:47AM +0100, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
From: John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Why isn't OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED the default?
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 17:38:39 -0500
Peter Bex scripsit:
Am I going completely mad and am I missing
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:38:37AM +0100, Sven Hartrumpf wrote:
Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:04:27 +0100, Peter.Bex wrote:
How about restoring the optimization option to the defaults and seeing
what breaks? For me it was highly unexpected that CHICKEN was producing
completely unoptimized code, and
Hi all,
After hitting my head against the wall why the numbers egg's division was
so much slower than Gauche while it is now using the same algorithm,
I noticed that some_pointer[x/2] was much slower than some_pointer[x1],
so the C compiler wasn't optimising this particular operation away, which
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 01:02:34PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
I'm good with this. There's some nice background on these macros here
(in particular, Changes in glibc 2.19 and 2.20):
http://lwn.net/Articles/589730/
Signoff attached.
Thanks much, Peder.
Thanks indeed, Peder! Signed off
://www.more-magic.net
From 45e4f87d35c4a7b2e779feade9d1da2d326876e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Hintz t...@thintz.com
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:38:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Improving performance of write-u8vector.
Signed-off-by: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
---
NEWS
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:05:24PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
On 2014-10-19 13:27, Peter Bex wrote:
I have one concern
That's addressed, as discussed on IRC.
Yeah, obviously I wasn't paying attention. Sorry about that.
Also as discussed, here are versions that suffix specializations #s#0
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 01:31:21PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
stability/4.9.0 has net been receiving patches recently. I wonder if
intentionally of just because we forget or because the original poster
doesn't indicate whether the patch is to be applied to stability too.
Anyway,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:22:55PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
Hi all,
Her's a patch that allows specializations to be included in generated
type files (previously, they couldn't be used outside the compilation
unit in which they were defined, so users wouldn't benefit from
specializations
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 02:57:17AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
Hi hackers,
Here are some list-related scrutiny improvements. I started with pair
walking for the scrutinizer's special cases to fix #759 (patch #2),
which made adding special cases for drop tail easy (#3). The other
special
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:19:48AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
Hi all,
The attached patch fixes #1149.
Thanks for this, I've pushed it to master and chicken-5.
Thanks for the wonderfully clear report, Juergen.
Yes, thanks Juergen!
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 07:24:23PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
On 19 Oct 2014, at 18:17, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
Thanks for the patch, it looks good. I've pushed it to master and
chicken-5. Please note that this is not the best test for the process,
because we normally require
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 08:49:06PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Fair enough. Since this is purely a question of implementation, not of
specification, we could have a config-time option: if false, strings
don't have a delimiting NUL (not included in the count) and are copied
by the FFI; if true,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:22:57PM +0200, Michele La Monaca wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
Good one. Anyway, I find that perpetuating C limitations/missteps in
higher level languages just because we can't be sure to handle
interactions safely
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 07:40:51PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
Improves inference for #:predicate and #:enforce branches by trying a
bit harder to find the smaller of the possible typesets.
Thanks for this patch. It looks like a great improvement, even though
I don't fully understand it in
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 06:16:40AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
---
tcp.scm |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tcp.scm b/tcp.scm
index ce7bb74..5389ed1 100644
--- a/tcp.scm
+++ b/tcp.scm
@@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ EOF
(let* ((buf (make-string +input-buffer-size+))
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 08:57:44PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
-(when (memq '(-r5rs-syntax) options)
+(when (memq 'r5rs-syntax options)
What a silly bug... Thanks for the patch, I've applied it to
master and chicken-5.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:08:59AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
The foreign-primitive form may return multiple values with the C_values
function, but its expansion is always declared to return a (single)
undefined value. This triggers invalid ##sys#c-w-v specializations for
single-valued
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:32:27AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
Here's a patch removing said special case.
I haven't checked this on Windows and would be grateful if someone could
make sure the updated tests check out.
Thanks for remembering this and picking up on it, Evan!
I've pushed to
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 01:31:30AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
On Oct 7, 2014, at 10:04 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
The overhead of calling C should be pretty minimal in the usual cases,
unless strings are the only problem. If it's the only dealbreaker,
I think that should
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:54:06AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
The danger could be avoided by a taint bit: if the string is known
to not contain \0, it can be passed directly. Otherwise, it needs to
be checked and marked if it's safe. If it's unsafe, an exception can
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:04:17PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
In this particular case I will be forced to decide my priorities: I'm
sitting on some improvements and threading fixes and cleanups I've been
talking about on once about a time. Currently I'm busy documenting
other
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 06:56:29AM -0700, Daniel Leslie wrote:
I hope no one minds me jumping in to add my two cents...
All comments are very welcome!
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 01:31:30AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
On Oct
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:34:23PM +0200, Michele La Monaca wrote:
Hi,
(rename-file x y)
fails on Windows if y already exists. I think it would be better to have the
same behavior as Unix (i.e. overwrite). The attached patch does that.
Hi Michele,
Sorry for the late reply, I've only now
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:50:57PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
Here's a very simple patch for #1085.
As a side note, there are lots of other procedures in srfi-1.scm without
argument type checks. Are the cases where they're not there intentional,
or would it be worth looking into adding some,
the attached patch?
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
From a7beb90ae87f7738afe63358f51a87fefca2c7cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:46:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Enable debug_mode on Android only for DEBUGBUILDs
---
runtime.c |2 +-
1
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:43:33PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
It was missing parentheses on a ##sys#slot invocation and contained unquoted
fixnum literals.
Thanks, Evan! Pushed to both master and chicken-5.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:33:21AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
So, I audited the whole lot of `foldable-bindings`, and in doing so
moved them into types.db as #:foldable properties for clarity.
Thanks for putting so much effort into this!
It's also safe to fold predicates, so rather than
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:17:21AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
On 2014-10-01 8:57, Peter Bex wrote:
Shouldn't the same be done for #:pure? If a procedure is purely
functional, it should be referentially transparent, which means it
should be foldable. Or am I overlooking something here
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:07:51PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:57:59 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
I intend to set up some salmonella instances to test the chicken-5
branch soon.
If you can explain what needs to happen, I can do the same
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:03:32AM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Just an update on the current status about this topic
Thanks Mario, for writing up this update.
I intend to set up some salmonella instances to test the chicken-5
branch soon.
If you can explain what needs to happen, I
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:57:15PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
We have a problem. The removal of tags in the directory hierarchy
breaks setup-download.scm's locate-egg/local, which is used by
gather-egg-information.
gather-egg-information is used by the make-egg-index script
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:15:15PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:29:06 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
I agree that all those things should be removed. I think Felix wanted
to remove gather-egg-information once, but kept it because it was being
used
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:19:08PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
I pushed the patches by Peter, including the one for henrietta (trunk,
also bumped its major version).
I've made some further tweaks to henrietta-cache, pseudo-meta-egg-info
and the chicken-infrastructure script that runs
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:12:56PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Hi!
Attached is a new version of the patch, which removes tests/signal-tests.scm
(this was forgotten and moved to the srfi-18 egg)
Thanks, I've pushed this patch.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
)))
((string=? -query arg)
(unless (pair? (cdr args)) (usage 1))
(set! *query-string* (cadr args))
From c26ebe8a6a933ff8ef5e0aeb52f2da9bf9724b72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:14:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 03:32:24PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
The second core patch adds the release argument to the query string
which the new version of Henrietta will parse.
This was wrong: it has to convert the major release to a string
for use with string-append. Here is an updated versions
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:02:18AM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Hello!
I have signed off a squash commit of all your changes and pushed it
to a new branch (chicken-5). I have a proposal for more meaningful
module names, though, and I will post a patch in the next days.
Thanks for
37f2258868c692fcb7daf13c92f09b4d3b0e00b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 19:55:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add convenience macros for calculating allocation sizes of
structures and closures.
Also convert the allocation calculations to use them
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:30:20PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Ok. The former really allocates a slot too much, but that makes no
difference besides wasting a word in the nursery.
Not too much of a problem, but it would increase the minor GC frequency,
even if by a little bit.
The latter
BTW, has this patch not been pushed yet?
--
http://www.more-magic.net
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:39:59AM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Hello!
This patch removes support for srfi-18 and srfi-69. I had to remove
some tests as well, specifically those that use threads.
This seems like a bad idea. These tests are there because we've had
very hairy problems
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:15:10PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
I am in favor of pushing this patch. Peter, what do you think?
I think that's okay.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Hello, again!
If I understand this correctly, then you want to expose the internal
threading stuff in scheduler.scm as a module?
I think we can do the same I did with the compiler modules: simply wrap
the code in a module
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:25:24PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Ah, well done, Mario!
But, some remarks:
* Perhaps we should svn cp the release/4 branch and add new eggs
afterwards, otherwise the 5 directory will be in the way. By
copying the tree, the new eggs for the
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:13:48PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
[replying to Peter]
I don't grok what you are saying here. Do you want to copy the entire
CHICKEN 4 egg list to CHICKEN 5? It may be better to copy individual
eggs later, when we've finished all our module refactorings.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 02:49:43PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
I think the versioning thing also affects the eggs in svn too. For
example, suppose right now you have egg foo at version 1.0. When
CHICKEN 5 is released, foo will be ported to CHICKEN 5. What version
will it be in
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:44:54AM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Hello, Peter!
I generally agree with most proposed changes on this list (with the
exception of the idea to drop fluid-let, of course.) But it must be
clear to you that you already created a pony page. It is impossible
to do
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:11:21PM -0300, Arthur Maciel wrote:
Peter, I remember you wrote about this on 2012, right?
http://www.more-magic.net/posts/lessons-learned-from-nul-byte-bugs.html
Correct, I think this is an important safety feature of a high-level
language. In fact, I was the one
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 09:41:01AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
On 08/27/14 11:00, Peter Bex wrote:
It sounds like you're looking for condition-case. I think this takes
care of the handling of various different kinds of exceptions in a very
elegant way, and it's actually my favorite part
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:27:29PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Gauche has just released its R7RS implementation. Existing Gauche
modules use dotted names by convention (e.g. math.prime, rfc.json,
text.html-lite), and these are mapped directly into R7RS module
names as (math prime), (rfc json),
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 01:50:13AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
On 08/26/14 11:06, Peter Bex wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:29:23AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
On 08/25/14 15:30, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:31:44AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
Ah, I didn't understand
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:37:12AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
(In not-so-good news, Gambit has abandoned its R7RS implementation,
or more accurately the former implementer has abandoned Gambit.)
Wow, that's very unexpected news! Where was this announced
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:29:23AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
On 08/25/14 15:30, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:31:44AM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
[explanation about ##sys# prefix]
I suspected that it is related to name clashes, now I see how exactly,
thanks for the detailed
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:10:49PM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
I think these are lofty goals, but it is way too much work for a single
release.
Perhaps modularising the compiler and refactoring the core modules should
be the goals for 5.0 release,
Those are the major breaking changes. I agree
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 04:26:58AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
I'd especially appreciate feedback on the core library names and
the things to kill from core. I will be expanding this page over the
next few days/weeks.
I've added lots of comments. Feel free to merge
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
Thank you for the feedback. I've added my replies inline. I've added
fluid-let to the list of things to be removed. It's dangerously unsafe,
and it is completely unnecessary to have it in core. There are a handful
of uses
Hello hackers!
I've made a start on the wiki, at what we'd like CHICKEN 5 to be about.
Please, do not make this into another pony page, only add things that
we really need to look at which require a rework in core which may be
backwards-incompatible.
http://wiki.call-cc.org/chicken-5-roadmap
I
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:35:26PM +0400, Oleg Kolosov wrote:
Thanks for the write up, it looks really promising.
While at it I would like to propose changing build system to CMake with
the following considerations:
I'd be willing to take a close look at it, if you can send a patchset.
I
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:59:58AM +0400, Yaroslav Tsarko wrote:
On 19.08.2014 19:24, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Sounds like a good first step, even though I personally would prefer
UCS-4 strings (constant lookup + modification and so on). But that
seems to be unpopular, AFAICT...
Wouldn`t
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:20:56AM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
I understand your concerns, but doing all the planned changes piece by
piece will be a massive maintenance effort and the compatibility hacks
required to have something halfway working during the transition will
be even more. I
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 05:21:06PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
I would think that support for Chicken 2 3 should be dropped after a
Chicken 5 branch is made.
Yes, that sounds reasonable.
I didn't know we still supported CHICKEN 2 and 3. In what way is that
done? AFAIK the
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 05:21:06PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
Mostly cleaning up. Shrinking the core system will make maintenance
easier, and reduces the need to follow our usual patch-review process.
I fully agree that the patch review process would be untenable for
the kind of massive
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:19:35PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
Note that this does _not_ imply we should implement things that we
don't already have, just move the things we do have under the names
defined by R7RS. If we have something that's close to R7RS
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:30:09PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [MEGA-PATCH] Modularise the compiler!
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 23:28:49 +0200
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:25:00PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
If y'all
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:53:22PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
- I don't know how this is handled with henrietta - do we need a
separate CGI script running for this? It seems so, so the
core-branch will need to have different download URLs in
setup.defaults.
Perhaps, I'm not sure
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00:46AM -0601, Alan Post wrote:
I used Chicken Scheme to bootstrap my company.
That's really cool!
As of a few months ago, I am no longer running any scheme code, it
has been ported to either C or Python.
What is/was the main reason you had to rewrite to Python? C
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:25:00PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
If y'all prefer, I could push my branch to call-cc, if that makes it
easier to work on this. I realise that sending 19 patches back and
forth over the mailing list will be very painful :)
Oh, gosh... yes, please create a
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:12:07PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
As of a647d9ed65f44df527e513464093447f56e24ead, letrec no longer uses
letrec* semantics, so this section in Extensions to the standard is no
longer valid.
Thanks, this one slipped through the cracks. I've pushed it, to
stability as
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:01:03PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
From: Moritz Heidkamp moritz.heidk...@bevuta.com
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Don't enable debugging on Android by
default
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:30:44 +0200
This was probably accidentally left in when generating
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:49:19PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
This resolves identifiers to their real (i.e. non-macro-aliased) names
in order to give cleaner scrutiny output messages.
Thanks for this change. It makes things a little easier to read, and
should reduce the need to keep updating
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:35:12PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
As with f4dafebf09662ff6bdbada206d394340d8c24ef0.
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:33:45PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
Due to an off-by-one, the special-cased scrutiny for `list-tail` fails
when the index argument is equal to the length of the list, giving a
(list-of ...) as the result type rather than null. While that isn't
technically incorrect, it
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 05:58:41PM +0200, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
Hi everyone,
the attached patch enables poll(2) for the Android platform. I verified
via strace on an Android device that poll(2) is actually used after the
patch. A preliminary NEWS entry is included but needs to be updated
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:44:37PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
Hi all,
This is sort of an opinion patch, but chicken-install currently writes
(none) to standard output when it doesn't find any eggs, which breaks
simple things like `chicken-status | wc -l`.
I think it'd be better if the
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 06:10:46PM +0200, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
The attached patch is a follow-up to my previous patch (the one which
enables poll(2) on Android). It inverts the HAVE_POSIX_POLL flag to
HAVE_NO_POSIX_POLL which only needs to be set when poll(2) is *not*
available rather than
,
but it improves consistency with the rest of the code)
I've also tested the code on Windows. Here's the new version.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
From 91a046e37c18d08cc3c2d9df2feaa0258aaebd0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 14
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 03:20:50PM +0200, Michele La Monaca wrote:
Another twist. Basically the same patch but with a more robust path
manipulation strategy.
Yeah, I was wondering why you were using string-append and friends
to manipulate paths :)
I don't understand why you treat the extension
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 03:32:15PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
I've also tested the code on Windows. Here's the new version.
By the way, with this change actually _fixing_ stuff instead of
just removing the procedure altogether, I think this patch *should*
go into the stability branch.
Cheers
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:37:07PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
I've tested the patch, and it indeed seems to fix this particular
situation. Somehow I thought this would break dynamically linked
builds, as there's no libchicken.dll, only cygchicken-0.dll. However,
*somehow* dynamic binaries
06a109028c94fde222004215093351c521951e7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 21:25:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix #1109: chicken-install -r should remove empty directory
when egg doesn't exist
Thanks to Alex Charlton for pointing out this bug
---
NEWS
c60ec9b5d57af950d269a511b0a280e8c8f34430 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 14:52:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Mark file-mkstemp as unimplemented on Windows
---
NEWS |2 ++
manual/Unit posix |1 +
posixwin.scm | 15 +--
3 files changed, 4
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 10:29:18AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Peter Bex scripsit:
This is an old bug and I think it's a good idea to remove file-mkstemp
from the Windows version of the posix unit.
Shouldn't it be removed from the Posix version as well? As I understand
it, the point
that as well, but the csi patch is so
simple I think we can just push it without any trouble.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
From 82ae7a211a9258b66c8b500a4ef8882c40fdab5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:30:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Do
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 07:56:01PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
This is a cosmetic change that removes the ##sys# prefix from the
lambda-info names of procedures defined in library.scm. Where a
procedure was defined first with the prefix and later as an alias
without it, their definitions have
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:20:16AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
On 2014-07-23 10:06, Peter Bex wrote:
This change doesn't make much sense to me unless we also deprecate
the ##sys#-prefixed versions. ##sys#error sounds more internal or
primitive than error, so (to me) it makes more sense
901 - 1000 of 1549 matches
Mail list logo
