> But honestly, I think it's better to just drop require-extension-for-syntax
> and perhaps even require-extension.
The former, yes. The latter is a SRFI, even though few support it.
>
> One more question: Where should we document "the initial (nameless) macro
> environment"? For example, cond-
Hi hackers,
As the commit message for the second patch says: now that all built-in
values are namespaced rather than marked as "##core#primitive" and
aliased with a "#%" prefix, we can drop all special handling for
primitive variable marks.
The first patch is necessary because I forgot to update
Hi there,
Here's another small patchset, this time with the goal of making
procedure lambda-infos slightly nicer to look at. None of these depends
on another, they just have a common theme. All three are very simple.
Cheers,
Evan
>From 68935403917fa8c3f067b92f638139c3d25bbc18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
