On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 07:10:51PM -0300, Hugo Arregui wrote:
> > Well, it's finally working!. I just remove the complete chicken
> > installation, and then rebuild from zero.
>
> Good to hear!
>
> It's unfortunate we don't know what caused it t
Thanks, Peter; I'll keep a log next time.
Quoth Peter Bex on Boomtime, the 55th of The Aftermath:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:33:17PM -0600, Peter Danenberg wrote:
> > I have to completely reinstall Chicken, incidentally, when I start
> > getting `undefined symbol' errors.
> >
> > They start cro
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:33:17PM -0600, Peter Danenberg wrote:
> I have to completely reinstall Chicken, incidentally, when I start
> getting `undefined symbol' errors.
>
> They start cropping up for benign-looking things like srfi-13 symbols;
> it's bizarre.
>
> It may be more of a mandelbug t
I have to completely reinstall Chicken, incidentally, when I start
getting `undefined symbol' errors.
They start cropping up for benign-looking things like srfi-13 symbols;
it's bizarre.
It may be more of a mandelbug than a heisenbug: it appears
chaotically.
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 07:10:51PM
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 07:10:51PM -0300, Hugo Arregui wrote:
> Well, it's finally working!. I just remove the complete chicken
> installation, and then rebuild from zero.
Good to hear!
It's unfortunate we don't know what caused it though, in case
someone else runs into it again. Ah well :)
Che
Well, it's finally working!. I just remove the complete chicken
installation, and then rebuild from zero.
Thanks!
Hugo
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Thanks for all yours replies!
>> This is weird. Do you have old chicken libraries lying around somewhere?
It is, I don't think so, but I will try to remove the whole chicken
installation, and then start fresh.
> If so, I'd expect to see C compiler warnings about assumptions of
> the function's s
On Dec 13, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2012, at 1:47 AM, John Magolske wrote:
>
>> - Some intra-wiki links are absolute, for example under /wiki/menu
>> there's [[http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggs|Eggs]] which I changed to
>> [[eggs|Eggs]] so as to be able to navigate to it offl
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 08:10:19PM +0100, Felix wrote:
> From: Hugo Arregui
> > [...]
> > csi: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/chicken/6/locale-posix.so:
> > undefined symbol: C_fixnum_modulo
> >
> > I tried reinstalling srfi-19 with chicken-install, but I get the same
> > result.
> >
> > Maybe I
From: Hugo Arregui
Subject: [Chicken-users] error with srfi-19:
/usr/lib/chicken/6/locale-posix.so: undefined symbol: C_fixnum_modulo
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:14:36 -0300
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a problem with and old script which uses srfi-19. I thinks
> something went broke after an update: I'
From: Matt Gushee
Subject: [Chicken-users] PDF patch updated again
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:29:09 -0700
> Hi, all--
>
> I fixed a couple more minor issues with the PDF egg patch. In addition to
> the changes discussed in the previous thread, this version:
>
> * Changes the format strings in tw
On Dec 13, 2012, at 1:47 AM, John Magolske wrote:
> Thanks for writing up these explanations & options, Jim. I was going
> to give your suggestions a try, but wanting to keep intra-wiki links
> working and also wanting to learn how to use qwiki for other purposes,
> I finally set aside some time a
Cannot reproduce with CHICKEN Version 4.8.1 (rev 19a6b5b)
But I will make a version that doesn't use the %proc routines.
On Dec 13, 2012, at 7:20 AM, Hugo Arregui wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Hugo Arregui wrote:
>> Oh sorry, i left the most important thing out!
>>
>> $ csi -ver
Hi,
> Thanks for doing that!
>
> However, your patch is out of date. It is for version 1.0 of the egg,
> while the current version is 1.0.2. The patch failed on the setup file,
> but the fix was simple. I'm attaching an updated version; you might like
> to check it to see if it looks right.
Hehe
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Hugo Arregui wrote:
> Oh sorry, i left the most important thing out!
>
> $ csi -version
>
> CHICKEN
> (c)2008-2012 The Chicken Team
> (c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
> Version 4.8.0 (rev 0db1908)
> linux-unix-gnu-x86 [ manyargs dload ptables ]
> compiled 2012-09-
Hi Hugo!
* Hugo Arregui [121213 16:15]:
> I have a problem with and old script which uses srfi-19. I thinks
> something went broke after an update: I'm using arch linux, and
> chicken is installed from the package manager.
Which chicken version is that?
Kind regards,
Christian
--
In the worl
Hi guys,
I have a problem with and old script which uses srfi-19. I thinks
something went broke after an update: I'm using arch linux, and
chicken is installed from the package manager.
It's easy to reproduce, just enter csi, and then:
#;1> (use srfi-19)
; loading /usr/lib/chicken/6/srfi-19.impo
Hi, all--
I fixed a couple more minor issues with the PDF egg patch. In addition to
the changes discussed in the previous thread, this version:
* Changes the format strings in two fprintf calls to use the syntax
supported by Chicken: ~v -> ~S and ~n -> ~%.
(BTW, it appears our printf format
18 matches
Mail list logo
