felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A few of you have mentioned their past interest in using Scheme
for a filesystem. Out of curiosity, what ideas did you guys have
in mind?
I must have missed that post. This is, when I *must* put in my
shameless plug about having worked
Adhi Hargo wrote:
--- Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's best to keep the authoritative version of the manual in wiki
format instead of Texinfo. I think this makes it easier for most
to contribute to it. I also think a Texinfo version should be
generated from it.
Alejo wrote:
On 2/20/07, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you specify what you mean by 'a Page Index'?
A list with the names of absolutely all pages in the wiki, sorted
alphabetically?
Yes.
I'd be inclined to believe such functionality should
Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
Crazy Eddie's GUI System
http://www.cegui.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Main_Page is worth looking at
in this regard. It is a C++ toolkit, skinnable, MIT licensed, and has
survived as the preferred GUI of the Ogre3D engine. Ogre3D ain't
small potatoes. This means CEGUI
Brandon Van Every wrote:
Chicken wouldn't have half the eggs it does if the non-Chicken
Scheme community had taken that position. Fortunately for us,
they did not.
Which half? My world is OpenGL and C FFIs. I don't see any
interloper eggs helping out here. It's one thing if your task
scwm - I recall vaguely.
Kon Wrote:
But probably I'm sold because I'm biased anyway. Could someone
please
tell me, what the difference between cells, termite and askemos is?
Cells is a constraint propagation system for CLOS (spreadsheet-style
programming). Termite is Erlang in
On Dec 25, 2006, at 10:10 PM, John Cowan wrote:
Shawn Rutledge scripsit:
What other kinds of constructs can you imagine in Scheme for
parallel
execution, which would work better than threads?
Communicating sequential processes (CSP) would be the obvious
candidate.
All the
So, it looks like the top two time-consuming procedures are
read-request and SSAX:XML-SXML. The third is probably
http:read-request-attributes.
Any comments?
Maybe, I would need to look into the chicken source code.
Probably you need to.
My experience from Askemos [www.askemos.org]
Steve Freitas wrote:
I wonder if there's been any movement on porting Termite from Gambit
to Chicken. If you're willing to cast your problem in an
Erlang-style light, that could make for very high multicore
performance indeed. Just spawn some child processes and start
tossin' your functions
=
Joerg F. Wittenberger
In response to R6RS status report as of june 2006 I'd like to add my
experience concerning section 5, on the mutability of pairs.
Summary
Non-mutability of pairs (i.e. all objects) creates a very different
language than traditional Scheme. Such a setting allows to practically
Hi Felix,
I've been contemplating...could chicken include some basic support for
native thread communication?
rscheme has these C functions
void rscheme_intr_call0( obj thunk );
void rscheme_intr_call1( obj proc, obj arg );
void rscheme_intr_call2( obj proc, obj arg1, obj arg2 );
which
Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2006, 11:35 -0500 schrieb Alejandro Forero
Cuervo:
But if this is to be the official documentation source, I'm a little
concerned about the lack of semantic cues. For example, in the snippet
above, the same markup is used for both the example and the sample
Am Donnerstag, den 27.04.2006, 08:17 -0400 schrieb John Cowan:
J?rg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
Not a few, but they did already. About 300 years ago.
And it's partially based on even older knowledge. Military this time,
the problem of the byzantine generals.
The Byzantine Generals
again, this had better been sent to the list as well }:-(
---BeginMessage---
Am Mittwoch, den 26.04.2006, 23:28 -0700 schrieb Kon Lovett:
I re-packaged the leventhshein egg last year, not re-writing the
existing impl, just extending w/ new procedures.
Uh, looks interesting.
May I suggest
Am Dienstag, den 25.04.2006, 15:16 -0400 schrieb John Cowan:
As for Chicken, is there a VM? I'm guessing not, because for speed
you just use the compiler, and therefore not a lot of emphasis would
be placed on making the interpreter the fastest.
No, Chicken does not have a VM.
If
Am Mittwoch, den 26.04.2006, 08:12 +0200 schrieb felix winkelmann:
On 4/25/06, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another idea I had is if Scheme people could agree on an ideal VM
implementation (like Java or C# has), and an efficient portable binary
data format, then binary
Am Dienstag, den 25.04.2006, 11:32 -0700 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
On 4/25/06, Jörg F. Wittenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.04.2006, 15:12 -0700 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
Well I see the idea of calling a web framework an OS is not new:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer
Am Donnerstag, den 27.04.2006, 07:46 -0400 schrieb John Cowan:
J?rg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
The VM of chicken is just neither a single data structure, nor (the even
worse definition) an executable interpreting some byte sequence. It's a
calling convention, threads data structure
.)
That's how I keep the canonical form.
Otherwise there are some other object databases that are not
Scheme-specific (Goods, and the Zope one for example).
On 4/22/06, Jörg F. Wittenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
who are interested in a decent web programming framework
sorry, this was meant to be sent to the mailing list, not private
Am Montag, den 24.04.2006, 12:46 +0200 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am Montag, den 24.04.2006, 08:21 +0200 schrieb felix winkelmann:
Jörg, what would be needed to port Askemos to Chicken
(not that I have time
Dear all,
who are interested in a decent web programming framework in Scheme.
We've been spending quite a while on such a thing and I'm simply not the
person to brag about my part of work (which has been too much), maybe
that's the reason it makes me sad watching you people here calling for
it
Am Samstag, den 22.04.2006, 10:08 -0700 schrieb Shawn Rutledge:
If anyone is interested: having a decent userfriendly Scheme CMS would
be *very* useful too :)
Yes as I mentioned, I wanted to build a wiki. But lately I've been
thinking that editing wiki-style text should just be one
Am Samstag, den 25.03.2006, 02:23 -0300 schrieb Mario Domenech Goulart:
Hello Daishi
Daishi Kato wrote:
Is anyone interested in supporting SSL in the http egg?
How stable and usable is the openssl egg?
I'm very interested in this feature.
I'm afraid I don't know enough about the
Am Dienstag, den 07.03.2006, 14:51 + schrieb Thomas Chust:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, JörgF. Wittenberger wrote:
actually I must admit that I haven't used the SQLite3 egg for a real
multithreaded application so far. Nevertheless I have done some testing,
which suggests that everything
Hi Thomas,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 22:34 + schrieb Thomas Chust:
Hello,
the SQLite3 bindings got a big update and now support user defined
collation sequences and SQL functions written in Scheme. They also do
automagical recompilation of stale statements now.
Nice work.
Would you
...
#;2 cons*
Error: unbound variable: cons*
#;2
Am Montag, den 12.12.2005, 21:00 +0100 schrieb felix winkelmann:
On 12/11/05, Jörg F. Wittenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just upgraded to chicken Version 2, Build 2 - linux-unix-gnu-x86 -
[ dload ] (from version 1.63).
Now
Hello,
I just upgraded to chicken Version 2, Build 2 - linux-unix-gnu-x86 -
[ dload ] (from version 1.63).
Now I can't find out how to tell csi to use srfi-1 bindings. I tries
#!/usr/bin/csi -script
(require 'srfi-1)
cons*
and some variations of it, but I found cons* always unbound.
What am
thanks for sharing this experience.
It's quite interesting to me: I've been wondering why a project of mine
ran sooo slow in comparision to the rscheme based implementation. But
considering that I love multiple value returns, I can understand.
I vaguely recall that chicken uses C parameter
Hi All,
I'm compelled to add my $0.02, even though it's sort of a shameless
plug. www.askemos.org might be interesting to those of you, who are
interested in this thread.
Askemos is a programming environment, which, too, shares the Erlang
style of concurrency. Persistant objects (basically
Am Dienstag, den 04.10.2005, 14:40 -0400 schrieb Graham Fawcett:
On 10/4/05, Will M. Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what Twisted is, but you might have a look at Termite
(mentioned in this blog
http://patricklogan.blogspot.com/2005/07/termite-lisp-for-distributed-
Am Mittwoch, den 05.10.2005, 09:29 + schrieb Thomas Chust:
Am 05.10.2005, 03:41 Uhr, schrieb Peter Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:21:55PM -, Thomas Chust wrote:
CHICKEN does not have any feature that would make continuations
serializable; it would mean that
Hi all,
my $ 0.02: once I faced a simillar situation when implementing SSL for
askemos.org.
Since the threading system of rscheme and chicken are simillar in a way,
one should consider that user level threads are hardly scheduled to
multiple processors, while kernel level processes do with ease.
501 - 532 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
