On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:21:43AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > but I think this question applies to the C compiler your
> > using, not to Chicken itself.
>
> If Chicken produces the same code on both platforms, you are right.
> Sven
That's the point of using C instead of assembly. It mea
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:15:30 +0100, Peter.Bex wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:35:55AM +0100, Sven.Hartrumpf wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Does anybody have seen a performance increase when running Chicken in 64 bit
> > mode compared to similar (or same) processors running Chicken in 32 bit
> > mode
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:35:55AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Does anybody have seen a performance increase when running Chicken in 64 bit
> mode compared to similar (or same) processors running Chicken in 32 bit mode?
> If so, which modifications were needed and what type of ap
Hi all.
Does anybody have seen a performance increase when running Chicken in 64 bit
mode compared to similar (or same) processors running Chicken in 32 bit mode?
If so, which modifications were needed and what type of application was it? I
am mainly interested in applications that were compiled
