For a Scheme (who would never ever - promised - participate in a
religious war ;-) the file kinda feels like Felix haven read too much CL
recently.
Yes, that may be, but being able to use a common API over various
sequences appears to be something that especially newcomers to
chicken might
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: sequences egg
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:59:25 +0100
Am Sonntag, den 21.11.2010, 18:08 +0100 schrieb Felix:
So, I wonder, why not use the same conventions? Instead, I see names
like 'size', 'elt', etc
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 03:55 -0500 schrieb Felix:
If I had to deal with a name clash, I'd just put a renamer-module in
between.
This winds up in *much* less mental effort, than memorising new terms or
abbreviations for the same argument structure (modulo some type
replacements).
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 03:11 -0500 schrieb Felix:
For a Scheme (who would never ever - promised - participate in a
religious war ;-) the file kinda feels like Felix haven read too much CL
recently.
Yes, that may be, but being able to use a common API over various
sequences
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 15:03 +0100 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 03:11 -0500 schrieb Felix:
For a Scheme (who would never ever - promised - participate in a
religious war ;-) the file kinda feels like Felix haven read too much CL
recently.
Yes,
Great, forgot the link
How about stealing most from SRFI-1 like this?
... which does not actually work because
- an error in srfi-1 reference, which is fixed in chicken
- a typo
- an logical error when it comes to repeated traversal of a sequence in
the weird case.
here's a better
From: Hans Nowak zephyrfal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: sequences egg
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:26:27 -0500
On 11/18/10 10:03 AM, Felix wrote:
I've put together a little library of generic sequence operations,
and would like to get some feedback, since I'm not sure about the
nomenclature and
Am Samstag, den 20.11.2010, 15:26 -0500 schrieb Hans Nowak:
On 11/18/10 10:03 AM, Felix wrote:
I've put together a little library of generic sequence operations,
and would like to get some feedback, since I'm not sure about the
nomenclature and API. Find it here:
Am Sonntag, den 21.11.2010, 18:08 +0100 schrieb Felix:
So, I wonder, why not use the same conventions? Instead, I see names
like 'size', 'elt', etc. Wouldn't it be clearer to use names like
sequence-length, or, if that is too verbose, seq-length, etc...?
I wanted to avoid name-clashes.
On 11/18/10 10:03 AM, Felix wrote:
I've put together a little library of generic sequence operations,
and would like to get some feedback, since I'm not sure about the
nomenclature and API. Find it here:
http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/sequences
And in the repo, usual place. It has a
10 matches
Mail list logo
