Evan Hanson wrote:
I hesitate to mention this since I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who
uses it, so it hasn't really been battle-tested (and it's not really
documented either), but the schematic egg might do what you're looking for.
In particular, the `schematic-wiki' program will generate
Hi Heinz,
On 2019-02-05 16:09, lundi wrote:
> > $ cat file.scm | sed 's/^[ \t]+//' | grep -e "^;;;" | cut -b 5- > file.wiki
>
> I considered writing documenting comments in Markdown and then pipe those
> through markdown-svnwiki, but I feel like there's little benefit over just
> writing comments
To answer my own question regarding possible alternatives to hahn: I
found that simply writing documentation to source with a special comment
prefix and then extracting that with some shell voodoo will be closest
to what I want.
My main gripe with hahn is that IDEs will commonly not recognize
Hi,
On 1/30/19 9:14 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
I don't know how hahn/hahn-utils work, but both seem to be ok according
to you test system [1][2]. It seems that you are using hahn-utils, but
you have hahn in your dependency specification. According to the
dependency graphs, hahn-utils d
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:57:17 +0100 lundi wrote:
> A new day, some new questions. First up, Chicken version is 4.13.0.
>
> For my wip egg, I'm trying to auto-generate docs with hahn.
> This works fine as far as running hahn from command line is
> concerned. However, things fail when trying to
Hello,
A new day, some new questions. First up, Chicken version is 4.13.0.
For my wip egg, I'm trying to auto-generate docs with hahn.
This works fine as far as running hahn from command line is concerned.
However, things fail when trying to invoke hahn through salmonella via
setup-helper.
M
