On Tues, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:30 -0600 Jim Ursetto wrote:
Hmm, I just realized scheduler.scm relies on nanosleep(3) on UNIX, so I guess
it is safe to use in posix-extras as well. I'll change posix-extras to use
nanosleep shortly.
After all the discussion and further study the merits of
On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:57, J Altfas p...@bmedctr.com wrote:
On Tues, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:30 -0600 Jim Ursetto wrote:
Hmm, I just realized scheduler.scm relies on nanosleep(3) on UNIX, so I
guess it is safe to use in posix-extras as well. I'll change posix-extras
to use nanosleep
On Feb 18, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
I would be ok with adding usleep to the posix-extras egg if you want. I'm
not sure if it should be a separate function or just override (sleep) to
accept fractional values. I'm thinking the latter.
Although not exactly what you asked for in
Hmm, I just realized scheduler.scm relies on nanosleep(3) on UNIX, so I guess
it is safe to use in posix-extras as well. I'll change posix-extras to use
nanosleep shortly.
On Feb 19, 2013, at 2:24 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
On Feb 18, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
I would be ok with
