On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:10:31AM +0100, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On 26 January 2015 at 00:02, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote:
From http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Using%20the%20interpreter the
,commands are called toplevel commands and you can define them with:
(toplevel-command
Hi Alexej,
My tuppence:
On 2015-01-27 4:01, Alexej Magura wrote:
I don't think I'll use the toplevel-command stuff after all: I can't promise
that the toplevel symbols readline exports won't get overwritten, and I'm
not entirely sure readline has any business providing private toplevel
On 26 January 2015 at 00:02, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote:
From http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Using%20the%20interpreter the
,commands are called toplevel commands and you can define them with:
(toplevel-command SYMBOL PROC [HELPSTRING])
Where does this tradition come from? Is it
I don't think I'll use the toplevel-command stuff after all: I can't
promise that the toplevel symbols readline exports won't get
overwritten, and I'm not entirely sure readline has any business
providing private toplevel symbols that are only applicable to it. It
might confuse
