Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-128 - almost

The release-info worried me too - TLD; super simple: if nothing else changes, it should work as before. To add it to the C5 coop send a note to the list that https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ThatGeoGuy/srfi-128/master/srfi-128.release-info it ready to go there. Best /Jörg On Aug 18 2018,

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-34 egg

Hi Jörg, On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 09:21:42 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > On 17 Aug 2018 20:40:02 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger > wrote: > >> there is an srfi-34 egg here >> >> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/srfi-34/master/srfi-34.release-info >> >> https://github.com/0-8-15/srfi-34

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-128 - almost

Thanks Mario, at the end of the day your suggestion will solve the development time considerations I have. Except for the "check the download process" part. Though actually rolling those out over a test network looks like a bookkeeping hell. Brings me to a downside of C5 I'm seeing so far:

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-128 - almost

Hi Jörg, On 20 Aug 2018 19:24:28 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > The release-info worried me too - TLD; super simple: if nothing else > changes, it should work as before. > > To add it to the C5 coop send a note to the list that >

[Chicken-users] C5 egg format and data files organized in multiple subdirectories

Hi all, One of my eggs includes a number of data files that are organized in sub-folders, and I was wondering what would be the best way to represent this file structure in the C5 egg file. I see from the documentation that a `destination' property can be specified for data components, but that

Re: [Chicken-users] New C5 eggs: llrb-syntax

Done. Reference removed. On Aug 19 2018, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 09:23:19 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: On 18 Aug 2018 20:17:00 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: nothing changed, just ported

Re: [Chicken-users] http-client help needed with basic authorization

On Aug 20 2018, Peter Bex wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 02:47:25PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: I'm trying to use the http-client to talk to a Jira installation. Without much success. Jira is documented to support Basic authentication. However it defaults to and advertices OAuth. For

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-128 - almost

Hi Jörg, On 20 Aug 2018 19:33:24 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > Thanks Mario, > > at the end of the day your suggestion will solve the development time > considerations I have. Except for the "check the download process" > part. > > Though actually rolling those out over a test network

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 5.0.0 release candidate 1 available

Hi all, and sorry about the late response on this one. On my main Arch Linux, everything I tested has worked except building statically against `check-errors` (ticket 1506 ). Operating system: Arch Linux Hardware platform: x86-64 C Compiler: GCC 8.2.0

[Chicken-users] http-client help needed with basic authorization

I'm trying to use the http-client to talk to a Jira installation. Without much success. Jira is documented to support Basic authentication. However it defaults to and advertices OAuth. For the case at hand, a script reading some data, it OAuth looks like wasteful overhead. The idea is to

Re: [Chicken-users] http-client help needed with basic authorization

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 02:47:25PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > I'm trying to use the http-client to talk to a Jira installation. > > Without much success. > > Jira is documented to support Basic authentication. However it defaults to > and advertices OAuth. For the case at hand, a