On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
[snip]
With that in mind I think we should explicitly use
-fno-strict-aliasing until someone is willing to take the time to run
buildbots, track down regressions, etc. for the other configuration.
I have a patch to do this
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.org
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@chromium.org wrote:
Other than the immediate gain of hiding crbug.com/28749,
Which you have a patch (actually two, but one with r+) for, right?
True. I
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
In this bug
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail
Random hang unrelated to my change AFAICS ... looks like it's going green on
the next build.
--Craig
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:55 PM, build...@chromium.org wrote:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/
Automatically closing tree for test_shell_tests on Webkit (dbg)(1)
I think you don't need to specify a target to build everything i.e.
just type make and it should work.
--Craig
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:44 AM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
I just switched to use make to build chromium linux, but I found that
make all didn't work at all. It only
all doesn't? - that might give
us some clues as to what is wrong.
--Craig
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:53 AM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
Unfortunately, it doesn't work. Actually, make == make all.
- James Su
2009/12/4 Craig Schlenter craig.schlen...@gmail.com
I think you don't need
The bug that is triggering here might be 28526 btw. ... ukai has a
patch in review for that.
--Craig
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Chris Bentzel cbent...@google.com wrote:
When DCHECK's trigger on my debug chromium build, I get an unsymbolized
stacktrace like
using the gold linker on ubuntu 9.10. I wonder if that causes
the problem.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Might not hurt to build from the latest sources and make sure they haven't
fixed
it already, too.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Craig Schlenter
I have a vague recollection of having seen this before ... upgrading
gdb may help.
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2003-01/msg00074.html
--Craig
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
I have never encountered this. Have you tried searching for the error
As Evan notes, things move quickly :)
What made the difference here is that Joel fixed that error and you
must have updated your tree.
--Craig
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Alexander Teinum atei...@gmail.com wrote:
Success.
Adding 'remove_webcore_debug_symbols' to include.gypi probably
Hi
The patch below should fix it (there are arguably other perhaps better
ways to tackle the debugger dependency etc.).
With that patch, the linux shared make build compiles and links all
targets for me.
--Craig
diff --git a/chrome/chrome.gyp b/chrome/chrome.gyp
index 3fa1905..c0caeb6 100755
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Jacob Mandelson ja...@mandelson.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:19:49PM +0200, Craig Schlenter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jacob Mandelson ja...@mandelson.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0200, Craig Schlenter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote
Hi
I thought none of the hex stuff was supposed be compiled. Line 183 does
#define NO_HEX_FP
but there is some interesting interaction between INFNAN_CHECK,
No_Hex_NaN and Need_Hexdig which might result in it compiling
for you. Hmmm
Try adding
#define No_Hex_Nan
after
#define NO_HEX_FP
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Craig
Schlentercraig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I thought none of the hex stuff was supposed be compiled. Line 183 does
#define NO_HEX_FP
but there is some interesting interaction between INFNAN_CHECK,
No_Hex_NaN and Need_Hexdig which might result in it
Hi
If your compiler is that old btw, then it may help to poke at the list
below and see what else you need to update:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxBuildInstructionsPrerequisites
Hopefully all those warnings will go away with something a bit more modern ...
--Craig
On Mon, Jul
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
[snip]
One piece to look at is the code that calls SetProcessBackgrounded(),
which on Windows marks the process as one that can be paged out but on
Linux is not implemented. I don't know how it decides it's ok to do
that,
Hi
Are you using vaguely equivalent versions of svn btw. between windows
and linux? Sharing a working copy is always bad news for svn and I
suspect horrid issues between different versions of svn on windows and
linux or perhaps even cr/lf issues contributed to this problem :(
Given that you
+chromium-dev
--Craig
-- Forwarded message --
From: Craig Schlenter craig.schlen...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [chromium-dev] Re: cryptoht.h not found
To: Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.com
Hi Mohamed
The instructions at
http
Hi
At some point I had used -ldl in the xml gyp file but then I dropped
that when I purely
targeted chrome and not any of the other targets ... in fact I haven't
even tried building
the other targets for a while so it's quite possible that they won't
build as shared targets.
Try
hammer app
and
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
At some point I had used -ldl in the xml gyp file but then I dropped
that when I purely
targeted chrome and not any of the other targets ... in fact I haven't
even tried building
the other targets for a while
it there but then I was not sure if it needs another
condition block for shared_library but before asking you again I
wanted to try to build chrome (hammer app) and see if that works as
you suggested.
Thanks!
Nidhi
On Apr 24, 9:16 am, Craig Schlenter craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm ... actually
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
[snip]
Maybe now that gyp is settled and most of temporary_link_stubs is gone
we could reinvestigate dynamic linking...
It's working for me:
http://codereview.chromium.org/67207 (changes to gyp itself, not really right)
Just a wild guess but I think it's missing the circular linker magic
start/end stuff when compiling the plugin. Will try to confirm when
I'm near a pc again ...
--Craig
On 02 Apr 2009, at 15:48, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I confirmed the debug build line has no -g.
Also,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a wild guess but I think it's missing the circular linker magic
start/end stuff when compiling the plugin. Will try to confirm when I'm near
a pc again ...
Confirmed. Here's the line it's using to generate
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks for the info! Could you dump this into a bug report?
Added to http://crbug.com/9060 ...
--Craig
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Avi
When I did the original change, that function wasn't being called with
a null window.
Clicking on a link in gmail opened the link in a new window as I
recall. At some later
point that changed possibly when some
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:13 PM, William Chan (陈智昌)
willc...@chromium.org wrote:
I talked to Darin and he told me that this needs work since it's
impacting the page cycler times, so I figured I'd pick it up. You
have a
29 matches
Mail list logo
