Can you elaborate on what you mean by configure the sandbox?
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:36 PM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can you please tell me if/where is the file to configure chromium's
renderer sandbox?
Thank you.
--
Chromium Developers mailing list:
See the email from 3 days ago titled PSA: new dev packages needed on linux
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Aaron donnythebow...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea what could be causing this thing? It's been going on for
some time now. All of my research turns up nothing.
CXX(target)
The bug tracker is a bit backlogged because many people went on
vacation the last few weeks. There's no need to email chromium-dev
about it. If everyone did that then chromium-dev would just be
chromium-bugs.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:20 AM, kapouer holi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
could someone
It has a custom .gclient entry for chrome-deps, should that be cros_deps?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:24 PM, James Robinson jam...@chromium.org wrote:
Every patch sent to the linux_view trybot lately dies with this error
in the 'gclient' step:
Exception:
.
-Scott
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
It has a custom .gclient entry for chrome-deps, should that be cros_deps?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:24 PM, James Robinson jam...@chromium.org wrote:
Every patch sent to the linux_view trybot lately dies
/cros_deps,
},
in .gclient, but there may be syncing problems unless you have git 1.6.1 .
cros deps is the new way dependency are managed between the two projects.
-Scott
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
The 3 linux_views bots currently have Git 1.5
Hmm, is the try server master overdue for a reload/restart? The
master.cfg is right, but it's still checking out chrome-deps.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
Ok, I think I fixed it. Running a test job right now. *fingers crossed*
http://build.chromium.org
Unless I hear otherwise, I'll restart the try server master tonight at
9 PM PST, and apologize to the people whose try jobs failed as a
result.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
Hmm, is the try server master overdue for a reload/restart? The
master.cfg
?
Also, djmm@ is working on getting install_build_deps.sh to install an
appropriate version of git...we should still get that done, right?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
Unless I hear otherwise, I'll restart the try server master tonight at
9 PM PST
I also needed to install libpam0g-dev. Linux_view try bots should be happy now.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
It'll reload the try server configuration so try jobs will pull the
right deps. I already installed git 1.6 on the linux_view
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
Anyhow, what's our best practices for disabling tests? I think ideally we'd
always log a tracking bug and add a comment, akin to what we do in the
test_expectations file for layout tests.
Another point to keep in mind -
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
proposals on which of these options (again, see original attachment) to rip
out are welcome and within the scope of this thread.
The vbox? holding the bookmark sync status boxes is too narrow. If it
used all the horizontal
File a bug at http://new.crbug.com/, provide screenshots. This mailing
list is not the appropriate place to report bugs.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Blade im.blade.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Especially the text on buttons, Chinese characters, are very vague.
How can I solve this problem?
--
Works for me. Do you have an all target in your Makefile? Can you
see what $all_targets is set to?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:29 PM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
make chrome works as expected, it builds out the chrome binary. But make
or make all doesn't work at all.
- James Su
I filed http://crbug.com/29364
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.org wrote:
Yes, except it's down and hasn't worked in days.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Isn't gcl try cl -b linux_view what you want?
On Thu, Dec 3,
DerivedSourcesAllInOne.cpp is the biggest bottleneck on Linux too.
Even when running make with a high -j value, one would end up in the
situation where one core is pegged for more than a minutes while all
the others sit idle.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Lei Zhang thes...@google.com wrote
(from the right address this time)
make test_shell ?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:21 PM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to build a TestShell target for chromium on linux?
On MacOS, there is a TestShell project, I wonder if there is a
TestShell target for building it on
reason.
Antoine
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi folks,
We'll soon be relanding a patch that pass --gc-sections to the linker
on Linux. For this to work, you need either GNU ld or a recent version
of GNU gold. You can test and see if your copy of gold
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
If you installed gold through [1], please run it again. I've updated
the script at r32315 to install gold 2.20. I've also updated all the
Linux build / try bots to gold 2.20.
[1] http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/build
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
If you installed gold through [1], please run it again. I've updated
the script at r32315 to install gold 2.20. I've also updated all the
Linux build
Do you have
src/third_party/yasm/source/patched-yasm/modules/arch//x86/gen_x86_insn.py
checked out?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:43 AM, sahid sahid.ferdja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
sa...@sahid-work:~/Documents/chromium/src$ cat /etc/debian_version
squeeze/sid
Big +1 for at least a third sheriff.
With two sheriffs, if one is not in PST, then really we only have one
sheriff. If that sheriff happens to be new, then we have 0 =
num_sheriffs = 1.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
At lunch today, a few of us
And have the tarball generated from this lean configuration.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org wrote:
it'd be nice to have a gclient config lean or something like that.
-Ben
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
In
Hi Folks,
In r30948, I fixed several bugs related to the Linux suid sandbox. If
you're running ToT with sandboxing turned on, you will need to rebuild
chrome_sandbox. Without the new version of sandbox, Chromium will hang
on start up.
- Lei
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
mmoss has been working on the make gyp generator, maybe he has a
better feel for what's keeping us from switching.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
wrote:
Not that it is
Hi Linux folks,
This is a kind reminder to check the return values from GTK functions.
Every time you put the unchecked result from, say,
gtk_file_chooser_get_filename() into a FilePath or std::string, you
risk a browser process crash if the result is NULL.
I just triaged several crashes of
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Michael Moss mm...@chromium.org wrote:
If you want to continue building 32-bit on 64-bit hosts, you can force
it by setting GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=ia32 in the environment.
FYI, I think $GYP_DEFINES overrides ~/.gyp/includes.gypi. You may get
unexpected results
Maybe you need to clobber? The shared build bot on the FYI waterfall
is working:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall.fyi/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20Builder%20(dbg-shlib)/builds/1069
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Jacob Mandelson ja...@mandelson.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at
It looks as though you didn't save stderr, only stdout, so the logs do
not contain any actual error messages.
2009/10/5 Ujjwol (उज्जवल लामिछाने) ujjwollamichh...@gmail.com:
While building chromium in Fedora 10, a strange build error has been
encountered.
The tail of the log of build(hammer
maruel, I think he's working on decreasing that number.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
I got 21 emails in the last day
for http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20915
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium
Oh sorry, I was thinking of buildbot@
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
maruel, I think he's working on decreasing that number.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
I got 21 emails in the last day
for http
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:23 AM, spotrh spo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/30/2009 01:58 PM, Lei Zhang wrote:
Have you tried installing glibc-devel/i586?
No, because the resulting binaries wouldn't really be x86_64, would they? :)
Native client is trying to build 32-bit binaries, even on x86_64
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:06 PM, spotrh spo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/30/2009 04:34 PM, Lei Zhang wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:23 AM, spotrh spo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/30/2009 01:58 PM, Lei Zhang wrote:
Have you tried installing glibc-devel/i586?
No, because the resulting binaries
Google Chrome builds without SSE2.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Oddly, I can still install fine on my pentium III laptop, I think.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
The code doesn't lie:
'conditions': [
Looks like both CXXFLAGS=foo make and CXXFLAGS=foo hammer ignore
CXXFLAGS. Is this by design?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:07 AM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to compile chromium with some special CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS, how can I
do? I'm using make build on 64bit Linux.
Regards
Of the three slowest tests as of last week, two has been fixed (thanks
to evan and jcampan) and the third one has a fix being reviewed.
The Linux trybots build almost as fast as the Mac trybots now, thanks
to shared ccache with a ~80% cache hit rate. Windows trybots are still
struggling - taking
Normally users have access to their profile data, but there are
mis-configure systems where this assumption does not hold. This leads
to weird behavior and bizarre bugs. I feel we need more sanity checks
and warn users that their profile data is messed up.
In bug 7733, a user wrote:
I found the
How often is this updated? How many runs does it look at to calculate
the test run times?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
The slowness dashboard is ready
at http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/slowness-report/
There are some problems with it
Chromium is currently 32-bit x86 only ... sounds like we need to
update the build instructions for 64-bit.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
If http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxBuildInstructionsPrerequisites
doesn't answer your question, please
I've heard a few complains of I cannot bisect because the archive
does not go that far back.
Are we tight on storage? It would be nice if we can keep more of the
continuous builds around.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
I feel a couple of people have
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Antoine Labourpi...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Scott Hesssh...@chromium.org wrote:
Would it be possible/reasonable to use distcc plus a farm of
cross-compiler machines to let you do faster self-hosted builds? It's
not the right
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
- Gyp uses pkg-config to find includes/lib dependencies, i.e. it's
going to look at the host for them. If your target distribution
matches your host
With the Google Summer of Code program winding down, I'm curious how
our GSoC participants are doing. Can the students and their mentors
share their experiences? (Assuming you're all done with evaluations
and all that.)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers
+1 for splitting unit_tests. On Linux, it's possible to generate a
2.3GB unit_tests binary that won't run. X-(
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Erik Kayerik...@chromium.org wrote:
The XP unit Purify bot has been failing for the last week or so.
Unfortunately, this has turned out to be more
Question, have all the strings been translated? I tried Spanish and
saw some untranslated stuff, i.e. IDS_OPEN_FILE_DIALOG_TITLE,
IDS_OMNIBOX_SEARCH_HINT_INFOBAR_TEXT, and
IDS_BLACKLIST_MESSAGE. I think these all made it in before the deadline.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Glen
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Antoine Labourpi...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Lei Zhangthes...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
On Linux, building with make is a lot faster than build with hammer.
Ever since I switched to the make build on Linux, I've never looked
back. I
Do we have a warning for when the difference between the ToT revision
number and LKGR pass a certain threshold?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruelmar...@chromium.org wrote:
- The reliability test has been red for so long that a bad regression
hasn't been noticed before it was
Working ok here with svn and the make build.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Mohamed Mansourm0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
Tonight I was trying to sync my project so I did git pull and it worked
fine, then I did gclient sync as well as --force. But gyp is failing:
I assume there's a similar patch for VS2005SP1. Does that have the same problem?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM, nakroyoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
if you get the latest patch of VS2008SP1 (released yesterday)
you will not be able to compile chrome
you will get errors relating to
It probably needs to be converted into a scoped_array like in
JPEGCodec::Decode. Can you file a bug for this on http://crbug.com/ ?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:59 AM, runtimerun_t...@tut.by wrote:
Hi
There is memory leak in the module jpeg_codec.cc, member function
bool JPEGCodec::Encode(const
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/testing/webkit-layout-tests says:
./run_webkit_tests.sh LayoutTests/path/to/your/test.html
--full-results-html will produce a page including links to the
expected result, actual result, and diff.
Does that help?
2009/6/25 David Jones ds...@163.com:
I have
You need to give more info. What revision of the source code are you
at? Did you make any local changes?
FWIW, we have a Jaunty build bot on the experimental waterfall and it built ok.
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall.fyi/builders/Chromium%20Linux%20(Jaunty)/builds/1981
On Mon, Jun
I noticed this too. LayoutTests/fast/transforms/matrix-02.html has
been marked fail for a while on Linux because the checksum is
different from Windows, even though the output pngs are identical.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
Since I'm waiting for a
FYI, --single-process only works in Chromium. It's disabled in Google Chrome.
Search for switches::kSingleProcess in
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/app/chrome_dll_main.cc?revision=18801view=markup
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:22 PM, estelectronix...@gmail.com wrote:
use
It's always disabled in Chrome. It's all in the source code. See [1] line ~416.
You can use Google Code Search to grep the code more quickly. For
instance, if you search for single_process, you'll end up on [2] and
oh look at the first result!
[1]
The test shell has a dump render tree function under the debug menu.
Does that help?
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Daniel Dreiberg
daniel.dreiber...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any tool to dump out the render tree for chromium? I would like to
pass an url (e.g. www.google.com), it dumps
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:19 AM, nakro yoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
the other thing, is that after i modify it the unit tests fail
[ PASSED ] 864 tests.
[ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below:
[ FAILED ] URLFetcherBadHTTPSTest.BadHTTPSTest
1 FAILED TEST
YOU HAVE 19 DISABLED TESTS
See
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Dan Kegel daniel.r.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
gclient sync now crashes for me:
That's unfortunate... I wonder what is different about your setup. The
buildbots and trybots and my personal
I'm having the opposite problem. I did a release build on Linux, and I
get tons of INFO spew. --log-level=N for N 0 doesn't turn it off.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Since Pinkerton just lost some hours to this and I did again:
The secret to getting
I reverted r14094.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Since it's been asked about 10 times in the channel so far:
- gcl is broken in some way where it thinks PRESUBMIT.py is a changelist.
Workaround is to remove .svn/gcl_entries/PRESUBMIT.py . Lei is
#include stdio.h
#include windows.h
int main()
{
HWND hwnd = GetAncestor(NULL, GA_PARENT);
printf(%p\n, hwnd);
hwnd = GetAncestor(NULL, GA_ROOT);
printf(%p\n, hwnd);
hwnd = GetAncestor(NULL, GA_ROOTOWNER);
printf(%p\n, hwnd);
hwnd = GetAncestor(NULL, 0);
printf(%p\n, hwnd);
BTW, we have both src/third_party/nss/ and src/base/third_party/nss/.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Thomas Van Lenten
thoma...@chromium.org wrote:
Sorry for arriving late w/ this question...
I'm guessing NSS NSPR are needed for the linux build? Should they be
pulled in via DEPS instead
I've seen it happen a couple times on Windows with the trybots this
week. (and only this week)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Thomas Van Lenten
thoma...@chromium.org wrote:
Before I start digging, anyone seen this failure before (one mac build bot
hit it today):
[ RUN ]
We're trying out a spreadsheet on the Linux side.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=prV2wWigilGslQBvu76GpQQ
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:37 PM, John Grabowski j...@chromium.org wrote:
(We talked about a spreadsheet for this... anyone have a link?)
I'm following the chain from rtn on URL in
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:21 PM, James Vega vega.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:04:58PM -0800, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Erik Kay erik...@chromium.org wrote:
$ scons_deps -v target
foo.c:inc.h:a.h
foo.c:inc.h:b.h
bar.c:bar.h
etc.
Does
65 matches
Mail list logo
