Hi Darin,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Darin Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no existing COM-style Chrome component that can be easily embedded
for web rendering.
-Darin
Do you (or Google, or Chromium) have a preference when it comes to COM
frameworks? It would be nice to have
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Darin Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm familiar with straight COM C++ and MIDL and can imagine how that might
look, but I don't know enough about the issues with ATL. I've heard some
objections to ATL in the past.
At any rate, it'd be good to see a
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Adam Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2008 8:04:19 pm Evan Martin wrote:
What we discussed today is the leftover bits: those not covered by
CHROMIUM but potentially by GTK (for example, font drawing). What I
think we concluded was
Hi All,
The context for this conversation is the chromium-based embedded browser
control described in a previous thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/5b23e1a218811b3d
I'm exploring the best way to embed a plug-in within the browser control
where the plug-in is
Hi Amanda,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Amanda Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm exploring the best way to embed a plug-in within the browser control
where the plug-in is part of the container application
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Mike Belshe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generally, I don't think you should touch the bridge (btw - the bridge is
going away as we reconcile differences w/ webkit- it will be the
scriptController, I believe).
I don't have source in front of me; but
Hi Feng,
If you wouldn't mind, please give us your opinion on this question. Evan
Martin says you might have already responded, but if you did we've somehow
managed to misplace it :-(...
Thanks,
Marshall
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Evan
Hi Eric,
Is there a document somewhere that describes the changes that we can expect?
Regards,
Marshall
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Eric Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We plan to land the webkit_merge_branch onto trunk tomorrow afternoon.
Hi All,
What is the correct way to create an NPObject for assignment to a CppVariant
instance? The CppVariant instance in this case represents the return value
from a CppBoundClass callback. For example, is it necessary to create my
own static class object, or can I use V8NPObjectClass (or some
Hi All,
I'd like to add a full compliment of vector handling methods to the
webkit/glue/CppVariant class. The methods I'm proposing are as follows:
// Methods for retrieving vectors of different data types
std::vectorstd::wstring ToStringVector() const; // this method already
exists
Hi M-A,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
It's a fair amount of work, you have enough time to implement that? I
can't tell about whether we'd accept the patches or not. I'd accept
the move of printing classes to base though.
I've already implemented
Hi M-A,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Ok fine, I can't give you any guidance if your changes would be
accepted, sorry. That seems interesting though and I'd be interested
in adding printing support to test_shell.
M-A
No worries, your questions
Hi Evan,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Evan Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe within a given execution context it's synchronous, but for
cleanliness anyway I'd prefer 2 or 3. 2 sounds more sane to me; the
only reason we have a fallback callback (I believe) is for one test.
I'd
Hi Brett,
The below patch adds GetHttpHeaders(), HasRequestPostData() and
GetRequestPostData() methods to the WebRequest class.
http://www.magpcss.net/patches/chromium_weburlrequest_newfields_rev2228.diff
Are you the right person to review this, or is there someone else I should
contact?
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
