I think getting something out the door for linux is a priority, rather
than having support for multiple toolkits.
I'm pretty sure - having been a Linux desktop user for 8 yrs+ - that
someone will have an itch to make a QT front end once there is a beta+
release.
I'm gasping for a chrome release
On Feb 19, 7:02 am, inaneframe inane...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not understanding the animosity shown toward GTK in this thread
thus far. A majority of GNU/Linux distros are now using GNOME as the
default desktop, I use and nearly every Free Software user that I know
IRL uses and prefers it.
Just to add to what Ben said earlier in the thread, the Cocoa
front-end is progressing quite well even though the Win UI is very
different from Cocoa in terms of the interaction models and how the
toolkits are designed (C++ vs Objective-C). The Model-View-Controller
design of the shared code is
On 17 Gen, 19:45, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org wrote:
+1
FWIW, the changes I've made in the browser over the past few months
(MagicBrowzr) should have made it possible for the front end to be
written in any number of native toolkits. Our first test is going to
be Cocoa on OS X.
On 17 Gen, 19:45, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org wrote:
+1
FWIW, the changes I've made in the browser over the past few months
(MagicBrowzr) should have made it possible for the front end to be
written in any number of native toolkits. Our first test is going to
be Cocoa on OS X.
I'm not understanding the animosity shown toward GTK in this thread
thus far. A majority of GNU/Linux distros are now using GNOME as the
default distro, I use and nearly every Free Software user that I know
IRL uses and prefers it. I'm not going to bad mouth QT, I used it
predominately a couple
I'm not understanding the animosity shown toward GTK in this thread
thus far. A majority of GNU/Linux distros are now using GNOME as the
default desktop, I use and nearly every Free Software user that I know
IRL uses and prefers it. I'm not going to bad mouth QT, I used it
predominately a
That isn't really the situation forQtthough. Arora is a good
example of howQtcan intigrate very well in Gnome. Using the
gtkstyle themeqtuses the native GTK theme to render widgets,
detecting Gnome it will automatically select that theme, use Gnome
shortcuts, and Gnome styled icons.
just
just theme something never make an application nativ. NEVER!
If the application needs Qt - You need Qt on your system an so it
can't be nativ on a GNOME Desktop.
Qt is still not possible.
Oh yes! And if the application needs GTK+ you need GTK+ on your system
and so it can't be native on
On Feb 14, 4:16 pm, vincenzo v.pupi...@gmail.com wrote:
just theme something never make an application nativ. NEVER!
If the application needsQt - You needQton your system an so it
can't be nativ on a GNOME Desktop.
Qtis still not possible.
Oh yes! And if the application needs GTK+ you
Hmm, that's good to hear, it will make easier to have Gtk and Qt
versions. I hope it will come true.
- -
Paweł
On 17/01/2009, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:29 AM, kojot kojot...@gmail.com wrote:
I not an expert (yet ;) in Qt and WebKit, but wouldn't it be easier to
+1
FWIW, the changes I've made in the browser over the past few months
(MagicBrowzr) should have made it possible for the front end to be
written in any number of native toolkits. Our first test is going to
be Cocoa on OS X.
-Ben
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM, cpu c...@chromium.org wrote:
When Dean and Evan say that they don't mind reviewing patches for Qt
ports, what we are saying is that
we don't mind having two UI versions of Chromium on
That's the situation between GTK and Qt these days.
The OS underneath is the same, but running apps targeting one
in an environment targeting the other in terms of user experience
feels much like GTK apps feel on Windows.
It doesn't have to any more. Qt 4.5 can use the current Gtk theme
and
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM, cpu c...@chromium.org wrote:
When Dean and Evan say that they don't mind reviewing patches for Qt
ports, what we are saying is that
we don't mind having two UI versions of Chromium on linux?
How would this work in the long term? UI tests times 2? you get to
When Dean and Evan say that they don't mind reviewing patches for Qt
ports, what we are saying is that
we don't mind having two UI versions of Chromium on linux?
How would this work in the long term? UI tests times 2? you get to
choose what Chromium to install?
Apologies if this was already
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:15 AM, andrewg droi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure most of you have seen the news by now that Qt is switching
from GPL to LGPL licensing. Does this increase the chances of a Qt
Chrome on Linux instead of GTK or has too much work already been
completed on the Linux
17 matches
Mail list logo
