[chromium-dev] Re: url_request document

2009-08-18 Thread Marshall Greenblatt
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall > Greenblatt wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've been using url_request for a while now, and I find myself > consistently > > forgetting the relationship between the various managers/handlers and > order

[chromium-dev] Re: url_request document

2009-08-18 Thread Marshall Greenblatt
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Peter Kasting wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall Greenblatt < > magreenbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've been using url_request for a while now, > > > Random drive-by note: Most consumers of URLRequest would be much happier > using UR

[chromium-dev] Re: url_request document

2009-08-18 Thread Wan-Teh Chang
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall Greenblatt wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been using url_request for a while now, and I find myself consistently > forgetting the relationship between the various managers/handlers and order > in which the asynchronous calls take place.  Does anyone currently h

[chromium-dev] Re: url_request document

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Kasting
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall Greenblatt wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been using url_request for a while now, Random drive-by note: Most consumers of URLRequest would be much happier using URLFetcher (which layers atop it to provide a much simpler interface, including abstracting away

[chromium-dev] Re: url_request document

2009-08-18 Thread Marshall Greenblatt
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Evan Martin wrote: > Though this isn't my area of expertise, if you didn't find something > on dev.chromium.org, I believe there isn't such a doc. We've done a > pretty good job of moving all prior "internal" docs to the public site > and off the top of my head I

[chromium-dev] Re: url_request document

2009-08-18 Thread Evan Martin
Though this isn't my area of expertise, if you didn't find something on dev.chromium.org, I believe there isn't such a doc. We've done a pretty good job of moving all prior "internal" docs to the public site and off the top of my head I can't think of any example of post-going-public documentatio