Hello everyone! I am building the source code of chrome for linux, and
I know that it uses gcc and g++. Since chrome is such a big build
though and I have 3 computers, I wanted to use distcc to allow all 3
computers to compile chrome and make the build much faster. Is it
possible to change the
Word on the street is that the ccflags are all wrong, and that release
builds aren't being built release properly.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Awesome. This is seriously good news. Thanks!
Mark
Steven Knight wrote:
Linux builds have been
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 06:28, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
I suppose the hard part would be
to teach delta how to do legal deletions from web pages.
Have you done a proof of concept yet?
I haven't done a proof of concept, but yes, a systematic and
structured approach for the slicing is
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 06:11, Brian Rakowski br...@chromium.org wrote:
It's not immediately obvious how
you would automate the process of creating a reduced test case, so I'm
excited to see what you can tell us.
The process requires the use of a proxy for serving the web resources.
For the
I can't actually get it to build (trying Release for now), I am
getting linker errors for X calls, we are probably not linking
correctly. I will debug it :\
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
Word on the street is that the ccflags are all wrong, and that
Notice the lack of -O2, etc. This also broke SYMBOLS= PROFILE=, COVERAGE=, etc.
I am tempted to revert it all.
de...@trex:build$ hammer -j6 --mode=Release SYMBOLS=1 --verbose v8_shell
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
scons: done reading SConscript files.
scons: Building targets ...
g++ -o
-lX11 -lXrender -lXext (at least) was dropped in the switch to gyp. I
tried to understand how gyp worked or where these were coming from,
but no luck.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I can't actually get it to build (trying Release for now), I am
(this isn't just V8, all of chromium is built without optimization in
release). There are lots of other issues all over the place.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
Notice the lack of -O2, etc. This also broke SYMBOLS= PROFILE=, COVERAGE=,
etc.
I am
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:59 PM, QAH qah...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone! I am building the source code of chrome for linux, and
I know that it uses gcc and g++. Since chrome is such a big build
though and I have 3 computers, I wanted to use distcc to allow all 3
computers to compile
And it seems to be built without debugging flags in debug mode.
At least, I can't single-step through code on Linux.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
(this isn't just V8, all of chromium is built without optimization in
release). There are lots of other
I confirmed the debug build line has no -g.
Also, all of the buildbots are red because of ICU issues:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Modules%20Linux%20(dbg)/builds/6601/steps/test_shell_tests/logs/MimeTypeTests
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dan Kegel
Just a wild guess but I think it's missing the circular linker magic
start/end stuff when compiling the plugin. Will try to confirm when
I'm near a pc again ...
--Craig
On 02 Apr 2009, at 15:48, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I confirmed the debug build line has no -g.
Also,
Dean, sounds like you have the seeds of a qual script. Perhaps you could
itemize them into a form which sgk can use as a proof test before the next
switch-over (assuming this gets reverted)?
jrg
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I confirmed the debug build
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a wild guess but I think it's missing the circular linker magic
start/end stuff when compiling the plugin. Will try to confirm when I'm near
a pc again ...
Confirmed. Here's the line it's using to generate
Craig Schlenter wrote:
When I add -Wl,--start-group and -Wl,--end-group to that (manually
since haven't figured out how to make gyp do it), then the missing
symbol problem goes away (at least when loading chrome and navigating
to mail.google which is where I was seeing the problem).
I don't
8708 should be fixed now due to http://codereview.chromium.org/59003/show
-- Evan Stade
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
In r12947 I made fatal gdk/gtk assertions really fatal. And of course it
made assertion from http://crbug.com/8708
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Steven Knight s...@chromium.org wrote:
It would be good if all of the platforms used similar configuration and
terminology, even though the settings will obviously be different. For
SCons, I'll turn these into command-line COVERAGE=, PROFILE= variable
I have CC=distcc gcc and CXX=distcc g++ in my bashrc file, so yes.
-- Elliot
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:59 PM, QAH qah...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone! I am building the source code of chrome for linux, and
I know that it uses gcc and g++. Since chrome is such a big build
though and I
So we'd take the product of variants and configuration?
I don't think we can do official this way because we need to modify sources
lists, so official would stay controlled by a variable for the whole tree.
I think your link changes would actually have to be w/in a
tagert_conditional blocks so
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 09:10, Steven Knight s...@chromium.org wrote:
Excellent idea re: qual script. What I'd like to do is turn these items
into sanity-check tests for a buildbot slave that specifically tests and
times issues about the build itself: build time stats, size of dependency
How about you file a bug for it and send me the number and i'll update
the site to refer to the bug#. That way, if we re-assign it, we
haven't lost any of the history.
As far as getting started, if it works on linux, then it should be
pretty easy to figure out what is stubbed out on mac by
Hi All,
Is there a current document that explains the multi-process crash
service/reporting design used by Chrome via crash_service? I see the
documents available at http://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/w/list but
they appear a bit dated.
Thanks,
Marshall
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Steven Knight wrote:
'official': {
'defines': ['OFFICIAL_BUILD'],
# Make sure units of code and data go in their own section,
# and then GC them in the linker to remove unreferenced data
Hello, Chromium is a Browser application, not a library or API. It is done
in C++ not in Java, if you want to use a Web Browser in a JFrame (Swing) I
recommend you to use this library:
http://djproject.sourceforge.net/main/index.html until Java rolls out their
JWebPane
Good Luck
On Thu, Apr 2,
On Apr 2, 11:12 am, Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Is there a current document that explains the multi-process crash
service/reporting design used by Chrome via crash_service? I see the
documents available athttp://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/w/listbut
One answer: try server.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Steven Knight wrote:
'official': {
'defines': ['OFFICIAL_BUILD'],
# Make sure units of code and data
Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
One answer: try server.
OK, I'm sold.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
Mike Pinkerton wrote:
How about you file a bug for it and send me the number and i'll update
the site to refer to the bug#. That way, if we re-assign it, we
haven't lost any of the history.
Done. Issue 9653: about:memory doesn't work on Linux/OS X
As far as getting started, if it
After reading some speculation in bugs such as
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=8544 I felt
compelled to dispel some myths and misunderstandings about the origin
and meaning of the mythical _purecall_ exception. My hope is that then
you can spot the problems in our source code
Steven Knight wrote:
What's the workflow for enabling coverage in this model? gclient runhooks
--force -Dcoverage=1 and then re-start XCode?
That doesn't seem natural for the Linux side, but I could live with it.
Linux devs: comments?
I think that the variant model is a stronger way to
I like the variant model as well. Perhaps I can rephrase my question.
How can we not klobber each other here? Should I land what I've got, and
you can adapt it once you implement variants? Or should I throw it away?
jrg
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Another simple(r) example :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/t296ys27(VS.80).aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/t296ys27(VS.80).aspxBut, as
discussed in bug 8544, we've see many purecall crashes that happens and we
don't
think it's related to virtual functions. The only thing I
So all I have to do is set:
CC=distcc gcc
CXX=distcc g++
Somewhere in the .bashrc file and it will use distcc?
On Apr 2, 1:08 pm, Elliot Glaysher (Chromium) e...@chromium.org
wrote:
I have CC=distcc gcc and CXX=distcc g++ in my bashrc file, so yes.
-- Elliot
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:59
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:23 PM, QAH qah...@gmail.com wrote:
So all I have to do is set:
CC=distcc gcc
CXX=distcc g++
Somewhere in the .bashrc file and it will use distcc?
You have to export those environment variables.
Using CC for the C compiler is a convention that many build systems
34 matches
Mail list logo
