On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com
wrote:
If you have ever used any of the EmptyXXX() functions, or ever will,
please
Hi all,
Just a note to let you know what's up with webkit rolls (or lack thereof)
right now.
We're at r51794 and have been for a while. Tip-of-tree webkit is at r51868.
* All manner of svg tests are borked from some reason around r 51800,
senorblanco is on that.
* A couple of build breaks
tracked
at http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=29737
Stephen
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@chromium.org
wrote:
Hi all,
Just a note to let you know what's up with webkit rolls (or lack
thereof)
right now.
We're at r51794 and have been
Ah... thank you for the ptr.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@chromium.org
wrote:
yikes 481 failures on linux... k... holding off rolling until we get a
handle on the nature of the linux borkage
Yes, It sounds like in all cases, there's going to be a big
rebaseline-them-all-on-linux step at some point, the sooner the better.
Given the nature of the problem (scrollbar drawing differences), lets roll
and deal with the rebaselining seperately. But that should be done soonish,
in the interim
I was wondering if worker processes have a profile affinity too. Eric's
bringing up Databases in workers right now and databases are definitely
per-profile. I'd vote to assert that a worker process only runs workers on
behalf one profile, just like renderers.
ResourceMessageFilter has a reference
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to be clear for those of us who are wobbly on C++, this is
because during the constructor or destructor, your object is of the
class in question, NOT of the class it will finally be, because in the
constructor the
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
wrote:
As mentioned f2f, this falls apart as soon as Chrome tries
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Darin Fisher da
+1 SecurityOrigin class
Sounds like a reasonable plan.
I suspect there may already be cases where we're actually comparing a chrome
generated security origin, as produced by GURL.GetOrigin(), with a webkit
generated security origin, as produced by WebSecurityOrigin.toString(). So
we may want to
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
+1 SecurityOrigin class
Sounds like a reasonable plan.
I suspect there may already be cases where we're actually comparing a
chrome generated
:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
wrote:
+1 SecurityOrigin class
Sounds like a reasonable plan.
I suspect
There's is nothing platform specific about r25099, since other platforms
don't show a hit... probably not it.
r25112 - use x11_util::GetXWindowStack
Does that load additional libraries?
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:41 PM, James Hawkins jhawk...@chromium.org wrote:
Maybe r25099? I don't know
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:57 AM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:26 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:49 PM, hap 497hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks.
Is the OS in the user-agent string?
Mozilla/5.0 (*Windows*; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.6 Safari/532.0
There's a chance that http resource caches will contain data tweeked per OS.
Maybe for cosmetic purposes... to make it look more OSX'y or
+ chromium-dev (this time, sorry for the resend)
Is the OS in the user-agent string?
Mozilla/5.0 (*Windows*; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.6 Safari/532.0
There's a chance that http resource caches will contain data tweeked per OS.
Maybe for
I just submitted the change that ENABLE's that flag a moment ago... we're
clobbering things now
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
Clobber needed?
I know Michael just enabled this within the last 24 hours.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
These instructions turn src/third_party/WebKit into a full-fledged WebKit
checkout
Hallelujah... thank you for writing this up!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or
I'd leave decisions about the worker related message port tests for drew and
dimich... the feature isn't fully functional yet in chrome (even if they
don't crash and happen to pass and such).
I've been unable to dup the LayoutTests/fast/events/mouseover-mouseout2.html
failure locally and have no
the change
in webkit. So we can't pick any new webkit changes w/o coming to terms
with this change first.
Ouch... just ran a local build and got a crashing YouTube page when
navigating away...
For now I'm NOT rolling DEPs :(
--
From: *Michael Nordman* micha...@google.com
Date: Thu, Jul 9
2009/6/25 Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.org
Thanks for review.
2009/6/25 Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
Only skimmed thusfar as well... but from what i've seen, looks reasonable
to me.
* A version of the diagram you have in the chrome doc would be nice in the
webkit doc too
Only skimmed thusfar as well... but from what i've seen, looks reasonable to
me.
* A version of the diagram you have in the chrome doc would be nice in the
webkit doc too.
* Does WebSocketHandle really need to be refcounted. I know ResourceHandle
is a refcounted object and this design looks
Chromium has no behavior whatsoever yet... the feature is utterly
unimplemented thus far... but it will have identical behavior to
safari, iphone, andriod by virtue of the same code base performing
those behaviors... thats the plan at least, and I'm working on the
code now.
Gears (i'm partly
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Dreiberg
daniel.dreiber...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I understand TestShell is
a test harness for running layout tests and a Chromium is a multi-process
web browser.
And I understand Chromium's browser thread does the I/O for each renderer
process (using
If you're interested in seeing the multipart form data encoder, that's in
WebCore.
WebCore/platform/network/FormData.cpp h
WebCore/platform/network/FormDataBuilder.cpp h
In Chrome, the webcore FormData data type is translated to a chrome
net::UploadData
structure in WebRequestImpl::GetUploadData.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@chromium.org
wrote:
+ chromium-dev
Can you please explain what you think has
dev.
For workers, we thought about how/where it made sense to split the impl for
chrome and talked with a...@webkit about it. There was some iteration as we
figured out things better and as he made suggestions and it has worked out
fine so far.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Michael
+ chromium-dev
Can you please explain what you think has changed since such decisions were
made (or why it's time to revisit such decisions)?
I don't think there was code in webcore suitable for this purpose
before... html parsing, javascript,sql interpretting... all dangerous
from a
+ chromium-dev chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
DOM Storage Overview
LGTM
LocalStorage
The exception is when a synchronous operation (synch XHR or alert() are
examples) or when navigator.unlockStorage() is executed -- I
+chromium-dev
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
*If you don't care where various bits of the localStorage implementation
live and you aren't scared about letting stuff out of the
+chromium-dev.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
*If you don't care where various bits of the localStorage implementation
live and you aren't scared about letting stuff out of
32 matches
Mail list logo
