Hello,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 22:48, Anand Mistryakmis...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, in general, how useful is knowing VM size considering it's not
necessarily corollated with actual memory usage?
I chatted with a few people when doing doing my memory work. Based on
this, I think we should
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Anand Mistryakmis...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking at the about:memory page and am wondering how useful is the
private VM field? Would it be just as good to have a total VM instead? The
reason I ask is because private VM doesn't map easily to Linux where
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Anand Mistry akmis...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking at the about:memory page and am wondering how useful is the
private VM field? Would it be just as good to have a total VM instead? The
reason I ask is because private VM doesn't map easily to Linux where
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Anand Mistry akmis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Joel Stanley j...@jms.id.au wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 22:48, Anand Mistryakmis...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, in general, how useful is knowing VM size considering it's not
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Joel Stanley j...@jms.id.au wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 22:48, Anand Mistryakmis...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, in general, how useful is knowing VM size considering it's not
necessarily corollated with actual memory usage?
I chatted with a few
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Anand Mistryakmis...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, by not trying to display the exact same columns as windows does,
hopefully there will be fewer uninformed comparisons of the numbers
between platforms.
Which bring about another question, how consistent should we be
