Le 2021-11-16 12:04, Miroslav Lichvar a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 03:40:52PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > I guess most people here don't follow the NTP WG list. There is one
> > feature proposed for NTPv5 that I think would make a big difference
> > for chrony:
> >
> >
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 03:40:52PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> I guess most people here don't follow the NTP WG list. There is one
> feature proposed for NTPv5 that I think would make a big difference
> for chrony:
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/ntp-freq-transfer/
This is now
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:31:47AM -0800, Bill Unruh wrote:
> Not sure how, since there is no frequency standard. Frequency is seconds per
> second. But for this not to be a tautalogy, what are the two seconds in that
> refering to? Anyway, yes it is certainly interesting. It is also slightly
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:55:56PM -0800, Bill Unruh wrote:
> I am a bit confused. I thought that chrony delivered its best estimate of the
> time now, which might be different from the time actually shown by the system
> clock, because it was still in the process of being corrected. So, if it
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:15:12PM -0600, Dan Drown wrote:
> I'm assuming the test case would be similar to the condition of "stratum 1
> was drifting but came back into sync with its upstream source".
Yes, that could make such a large offset, but in the test it was meant
for demonstration only.
I am a bit confused. I thought that chrony delivered its best estimate of the
time now, which might be different from the time actually shown by the system
clock, because it was still in the process of being corrected. So, if it
decided that the time, from the best fit, now was 12:00:00.
Thank you for sending that out Miroslav. Very interesting read.
Denny
> On Jan 28, 2021, at 06:40, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> I guess most people here don't follow the NTP WG list. There is one
> feature proposed for NTPv5 that I think would make a big difference
> for chrony:
>
>
Quoting Miroslav Lichvar :
I guess most people here don't follow the NTP WG list. There is one
feature proposed for NTPv5 that I think would make a big difference
for chrony:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/ntp-freq-transfer/
Very interesting, thank you for gathering this data.
I'm
William G. Unruh __| Canadian Institute for| Tel: +1(604)822-3273
Physics _|___ Advanced Research _| Fax: +1(604)822-5324
UBC, Vancouver,BC _|_ Program in Cosmology | un...@physics.ubc.ca
Canada V6T 1Z1 | and Gravity __|_ www.theory.physics.ubc.ca/
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021,
Thank you Miroslav
> On 29/01/2021, at 3:40 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> I guess most people here don't follow the NTP WG list. There is one
> feature proposed for NTPv5 that I think would make a big difference
> for chrony:
That is a very interesting paper you have written and has a result.
I guess most people here don't follow the NTP WG list. There is one
feature proposed for NTPv5 that I think would make a big difference
for chrony:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/ntp-freq-transfer/
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-dev-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with
11 matches
Mail list logo
