On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:43:08AM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> There could still be ways to proceed without doing this, but I'm not
> sure of a natural way of grouping the directives into files, without
> assuming which ones are likely to be overridden by a distribution
> and preserving
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:19 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:21:29AM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:31 AM Miroslav Lichvar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I think it could be a fragment now, and probably everything else
> > > except the default
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:21:29AM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:31 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> >
> > I think it could be a fragment now, and probably everything else
> > except the default servers. I'll see if I can add an example of
> > a fragmented configuration,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:31 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> I think it could be a fragment now, and probably everything else
> except the default servers. I'll see if I can add an example of
> a fragmented configuration, which downstreams could use.
>
That'd help a lot! Would then rebase
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 04:01:27AM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> For now I've left https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chrony/pull-request/3
> with a fragment for `sourcedirs`, as the PR is pending the `sourcedirs`
> being packaged. In the meantime I can take a look to see what changes
> are
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:59 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:09:54PM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> > That sounds a good idea! We only need to reload the NTP sources -
> > having a directive to specify where the NTP sources are managed makes
> > sense. Would the
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:09:54PM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> That sounds a good idea! We only need to reload the NTP sources -
> having a directive to specify where the NTP sources are managed makes
> sense. Would the directive point to a file/directory/glob to load
> files containing the NTP
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 10:54 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> Would it make sense to add a suffix to the non-DHCP dispatcher script
> (e.g .online -> 20-chrony-online) to avoid confusion with the two
> scripts?
Done - I gave it `onoffline` as a suffix, just to help suggest it
applies for offline
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:54 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> Following up on the comments from bugzilla about reloading
> configuration.
>
> chronyd cannot easily support reloading its configuration (e.g. due to
> losing root privileges), but it could have a directive specific to NTP
> sources. The
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:23:21PM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> Attached an interdiff of the overall changes from last comments.
>
> I have also updated https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chrony/pull-request/3
> with the downstream patch that would be applied downstream to work with
>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:23:21PM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 5:44 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > I suspect this breaks the networkd-dispatcher support. IIRC there are no
> > arguments passed to the script.
>
> I see - I should have looked into what'd happen if less
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 5:44 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > From 9cf2514489352140f70d650cfc6f41f4e4f6a983 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Robert Fairley
> > Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 02:10:38 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] examples: upstream chrony.helper script
>
> This patch looks good to me,
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:26:21PM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback and suggestions on the approach, makes sense
> to keep the files as general examples without the distribution-specific
> handling. I have updated the patch to include chrony.helper.in, following
> these
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 7:27 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> I'd rather avoid having any distribution-specific code in the
> examples. If there was a downstream change in one of the directories
> for instance, we would need to support different versions of the
> distribution.
>
> If you would like
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 01:48:31PM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> Would it be reasonable to check `os-release`, and source /etc/sysconfig
> if `ID`/`ID_LIKE` has `fedora` or `rhel`? Directories set by
> $chrony_conf, $chrony_service, and $helper_dir could be set in an
> environment file maintained
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:39 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> With this change the example NM dispatcher script would depend on the
> chrony-helper script, which is not included in the upstream
> repository. The patch should be downstream, or the helper script needs
> to be modified to work on all
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:56:30AM -0400, Robert Fairley wrote:
> Following discussion in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800901,
> this patch carries over NTP config for DHCP client backends in
> NetworkManagerother than dhclient. I have tested this with a Fedora
> machine using the
17 matches
Mail list logo
