Re: [chrony-users] Chrony and raw DCF receivers?

2017-10-25 Thread Bill Unruh
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, V10lator wrote: Hi, I wanted to setup my own stratum 1 NTP server, so I wired a raw DCF77 receiver (127.127.8.0 mode 5 or 127.127.8.0 mode 6 with ntpd) to a SBC and tested a bit with ntpd. After some time I decided to give chrony a try as ntpd had too much shortcomings.

Re: [chrony-users] Possible bug in PPS support

2017-10-25 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:14:21PM +0200, Rob Janssen wrote: > I am now monitoring the Root dispersion and this appears to work OK, after > some tweaking > of the threshold value. The reference time unfortunately is in a format that > is not easy to > check for "being recent" in a simple

Re: [chrony-users] Chrony and raw DCF receivers?

2017-10-25 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 09:04:29AM +0200, V10lator wrote: > Now chronyc is a complete show stopper as I can't find a way to tell it to > read the DCF77 signal. There are only options for PPS (GPS receivers, I > think). SHM also is no option as the only thing usable with this is radioclk > but that

[chrony-users] Chrony and raw DCF receivers?

2017-10-25 Thread V10lator
Hi, I wanted to setup my own stratum 1 NTP server, so I wired a raw DCF77 receiver (127.127.8.0 mode 5 or 127.127.8.0 mode 6 with ntpd) to a SBC and tested a bit with ntpd. After some time I decided to give chrony a try as ntpd had too much shortcomings. Now chronyc is a complete show

Re: [chrony-users] Possible bug in PPS support

2017-10-25 Thread Rob Janssen
Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:14:21PM +0200, Rob Janssen wrote: I am now monitoring the Root dispersion and this appears to work OK, after some tweaking of the threshold value. The reference time unfortunately is in a format that is not easy to check for "being recent"