Re: [cia-drugs] With the Lieberman Defeat, Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed
Yes, Lieberman is despicable, but so is Ned Lamont. The Illuminati control both sides; that's why they always win and we always LOSE. This is why my work exists; I'm tired of losing, and I'll bet you are too. Peace, Arlene Johnson Publisher/Author http://www.truedemocracy.net Click on Magazine to access my e-zine. Password for 2006 editions: message No password is needed to previous editions. -Original Message- >From: Vigilius Haufniensis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Aug 12, 2006 10:12 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [cia-drugs] With the Lieberman Defeat, Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed > >http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2006/lieberman_dlc_down.html > > With the Lieberman Defeat, > Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed > by Nancy Spannaus > > The defeat of the leading Republican Bush-lover in the Democratic Party, > Joe Lieberman, in the Senate Democratic primary in Connecticut on Aug. 8, has > thrown a huge monkeywrench into the efforts of the Felix Rohatyn-funded > Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) to stage a comeback in the runup to the > November Congressional elections. The field is now wide open for the > Democrats to turn to Lyndon LaRouche's leadership, especially as LaRouche has > been the spearhead of the anti-Lieberman drive. Any other course is going to > lead, quite predictably, to a smashing Democratic defeat in November. > > LaRouche representatives in Washington, D.C. are already receiving > congratulations on the Lieberman defeat, much as they did when leading > Republican thug Tom DeLay of Texas was knocked out of politics. The real > question is: Do the Democrats have the guts to follow up? > > Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.), one of the many leading > Democrats who had endorsed Lieberman prior to the primary, responded to the > election result with his most feisty comments in months. According to the > Aug. 10 Boston Globe, Reid said: "But the perception was that he was too > close to George Bush, and this election was, in many respects, a referendum > on the President more than anything else. The results bode well for > Democratic victories in November and our efforts to take the country in a new > direction." Reid said polls show Democrats winning Republican-held Senate > seats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Montana, Missouri, and Rhode Island. > > "A lot of time has gone by and the numbers haven't changed. In > actuality, Ohio has gotten better. Montana has gotten better. And now we have > three other seats we are looking at. We were only looking also at Tennessee > and Arizona. Now we've added Virginia to the mix." Reid said. > > Out of the eight Republican seats Reid mentioned, the Democrats need to > win six, in order to take control of the Senate. > > The Lieberman Stink > Lieberman's loss is a direct reflection of the fact that the Connecticut > electorate saw him as the "kissing cousin" of George W. Bush. Like the > majority of the nation, Connecticut voters are in revulsion against the > brutal, no-win war in Iraq, and the complete lack of action by the current > Administration and Congress on the accelerating economic and financial > collapse. Challenger Ned Lamont's anti-war campaign was a plus for him, but > Lieberman's negatives far outweighed them. Washington sources tell EIR that > when Lieberman began to threaten the party that he would campaign as an > Independent if he lost the primary, he pushed many over the edge, against him. > > Lieberman comes by his thug-like behavior naturally. As LaRouche's EIR > exposed in a series of mass-run offprints back in August 2002, Lieberman got > his start in the Senate with the full backing of some of the most notorious > right-wing fascist circles on the planet, including avowed Carlist William F. > Buckley. Buckley not only waged a propaganda campaign against Lieberman's > opponent, Lowell Weicker, in the Senate race of 1988, but bailed Lieberman > out financially by steering him to the Cuban exile community in Miami. > Lieberman maintained the close connections with the Cuban right wing, at > least up through the 2000 Presidential election, when he was known as "Gore's > Man in Little Havana." (See "Fascist William Buckley Put Joe Lieberman in the > Senate," EIR, July 26, 2002.) > > Then there are Lieberman's mob connections, starting with Michael > Steinhardt, the chairman and bankroller of the DLC when it was launched out > of Pam Harriman's "Democrats for the 80s" late in that decade. Steinhardt, > the son of the leading jewel fence for the Meyer Lansky syndicate, ran one o
[cia-drugs] With the Lieberman Defeat, Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2006/lieberman_dlc_down.html With the Lieberman Defeat,Rohatyn's DLC is Doomed by Nancy Spannaus The defeat of the leading Republican Bush-lover in the Democratic Party, Joe Lieberman, in the Senate Democratic primary in Connecticut on Aug. 8, has thrown a huge monkeywrench into the efforts of the Felix Rohatyn-funded Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) to stage a comeback in the runup to the November Congressional elections. The field is now wide open for the Democrats to turn to Lyndon LaRouche's leadership, especially as LaRouche has been the spearhead of the anti-Lieberman drive. Any other course is going to lead, quite predictably, to a smashing Democratic defeat in November. LaRouche representatives in Washington, D.C. are already receiving congratulations on the Lieberman defeat, much as they did when leading Republican thug Tom DeLay of Texas was knocked out of politics. The real question is: Do the Democrats have the guts to follow up? Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.), one of the many leading Democrats who had endorsed Lieberman prior to the primary, responded to the election result with his most feisty comments in months. According to the Aug. 10 Boston Globe, Reid said: "But the perception was that he was too close to George Bush, and this election was, in many respects, a referendum on the President more than anything else. The results bode well for Democratic victories in November and our efforts to take the country in a new direction." Reid said polls show Democrats winning Republican-held Senate seats in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Montana, Missouri, and Rhode Island. "A lot of time has gone by and the numbers haven't changed. In actuality, Ohio has gotten better. Montana has gotten better. And now we have three other seats we are looking at. We were only looking also at Tennessee and Arizona. Now we've added Virginia to the mix." Reid said. Out of the eight Republican seats Reid mentioned, the Democrats need to win six, in order to take control of the Senate. The Lieberman Stink Lieberman's loss is a direct reflection of the fact that the Connecticut electorate saw him as the "kissing cousin" of George W. Bush. Like the majority of the nation, Connecticut voters are in revulsion against the brutal, no-win war in Iraq, and the complete lack of action by the current Administration and Congress on the accelerating economic and financial collapse. Challenger Ned Lamont's anti-war campaign was a plus for him, but Lieberman's negatives far outweighed them. Washington sources tell EIR that when Lieberman began to threaten the party that he would campaign as an Independent if he lost the primary, he pushed many over the edge, against him. Lieberman comes by his thug-like behavior naturally. As LaRouche's EIR exposed in a series of mass-run offprints back in August 2002, Lieberman got his start in the Senate with the full backing of some of the most notorious right-wing fascist circles on the planet, including avowed Carlist William F. Buckley. Buckley not only waged a propaganda campaign against Lieberman's opponent, Lowell Weicker, in the Senate race of 1988, but bailed Lieberman out financially by steering him to the Cuban exile community in Miami. Lieberman maintained the close connections with the Cuban right wing, at least up through the 2000 Presidential election, when he was known as "Gore's Man in Little Havana." (See "Fascist William Buckley Put Joe Lieberman in the Senate," EIR, July 26, 2002.) Then there are Lieberman's mob connections, starting with Michael Steinhardt, the chairman and bankroller of the DLC when it was launched out of Pam Harriman's "Democrats for the 80s" late in that decade. Steinhardt, the son of the leading jewel fence for the Meyer Lansky syndicate, ran one of the filthiest hedge funds on Wall Street during the 1980s and 1990s. After he shut down his hedge fund in the wake of his company being involved in a scam over Treasury bonds, Steinhardt emerged as a major player in the Edgar Bronfman-founded Mega Group. Steinhardt, who now funds the neo-con New York Sun newspaper, has continued to be close to Lieberman. The two collaborated in the infamous September 1998 effort to carry out a coup d'état against the Clinton Administration, by trying to get President Clinton to resign in the wake of the Monica Lewinsky affair. Indeed, Lieberman is known in some Washington political circles as the "Senator from
