Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-06-28 Thread Bryan Burgin
: 'cifs-protocol@cifs.org'; MSSolve Case Email; Tarun Chopra Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:01553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Please let me know if there are any other questions - otherwise I'll be resolving the issue as resolved from our side. Thanks! - Jay -Original Me

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-06-28 Thread Jay Simmons
l@cifs.org'; MSSolve Case Email; Tarun Chopra Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:01553031054] SystemLibraryDTC * So, does this mean that the 'new' behaviour of NT_STATUS_NO_USER_SESSION_KEY is due to the stack being co-incidentally zero at this point, but that this might not alwa

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-06-20 Thread Jay Simmons
. Do you have any other questions around this issue? Thx, Jay Simmons -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 5:33 AM To: Bryan Burgin Cc: Jay Simmons; 'cifs-protocol@cifs.org'; MSSolve Case Email; Tarun Chopra Subject

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-06-15 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 15:56 +, Bryan Burgin wrote: > [+Jay Simmons] > > Hi Andrew. We made some progress on this issue. Below is the response from > Jay Simmons who researched this for you. Jay agreed to join this thread. > > "Thanks for your extreme patience on this issue.Your findin

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-06-12 Thread Bryan Burgin
rom: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 10:36 PM To: Bryan Burgin Cc: 'cifs-protocol@cifs.org'; MSSolve Case Email; Tarun Chopra Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 06:21 +, Bryan Bu

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-02-12 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 06:21 +, Bryan Burgin wrote: > Andrew, > > I'm touching base to see if you can provide the exact smbtorture steps to > reproduce your issue. bin/smbtorture ncacn_np:win2003r2-2[seal] rpc.lsa.secrets -Uadministrator%penguin win2003r2-2 is naturally a win2003r2 server,

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-02-12 Thread Bryan Burgin
t: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:01553031054] SystemLibraryDTC Also adding Tarun. Neil is working with smbtorture to repro this issue. Can you explain more about the exact setup. Anything special required (a special build of smbtorture? Samba 3 or 4?)? What are the exact parameters require

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-02-07 Thread Bryan Burgin
[mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:10 AM To: Bryan Burgin Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:01553031054] SystemLibraryDTC On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 22:05 +, Bryan Burgin wrote: > Andrew, > > I'm working with N

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-02-02 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 22:05 +, Bryan Burgin wrote: > Andrew, > > I'm working with Neil and others here. Can you tell us how to repro this > issue in-house? Wasn't that what we started this thread with? https://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/2011-November/002213.html -- Andrew Bart

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-01-30 Thread Bryan Burgin
Andrew, I'm working with Neil and others here. Can you tell us how to repro this issue in-house? Bryan -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:45 PM To: Bryan Burgin Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email Subject:

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-01-27 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 17:20 +, Bryan Burgin wrote: > > > Andrew, > > > > We completed our investigation to this issue and propose the following > changes to [MS-DTYP], [MS-LSAD], [MS-SAMR] and [MS-WKST]. The text > below contains yellow highlighting to identify changed text. If the > h

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-01-27 Thread Bryan Burgin
Andrew, We completed our investigation to this issue and propose the following changes to [MS-DTYP], [MS-LSAD], [MS-SAMR] and [MS-WKST]. The text below contains yellow highlighting to identify changed text. If the highlighting causes a problem for you, please let me know. Thank you for your

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2012-01-04 Thread Bryan Burgin
[Hongwei to bcc] Andrew, I'm filling in for Hongwei on this issue. I am engaged with several document groups here to sort this issue out. Presently I'm working with Neil Martin, who you know, and the current thinking is that this might be addressed in an update to [MS-DTYP]. I'll let you kn

Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2011-10-17 Thread Hongwei Sun
...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] On Behalf Of Edgar Olougouna Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 9:47 AM To: Andrew Bartlett Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org Subject: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 01553031054] SystemLibraryDTC [Dochelp to bcc] [Case number in subject] Andrew, One of our

[cifs-protocol] [REG: 111101553031054] SystemLibraryDTC

2011-10-15 Thread Edgar Olougouna
[Dochelp to bcc] [Case number in subject] Andrew, One of our teammates will follow-up on this issue. The case number is 01553031054. Thanks, Edgar -Original Message- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org] Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:51 AM To: Interoperability Do