]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:34 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - problem with MS-ADTS docs on
possibleInferiors
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:03 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Tridge,
Thanks for pointing
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:03 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Tridge,
Thanks for pointing out the problem in the description of POSSSUPERIORS().
We revised the definition of the function in section 3.1.1.4.2 of future
release of MS-ADTS. Please let us know if there is any problem.
Can you
Hi Hongwei,
We finished changing definitions of AUXCLASS(),POSSSUPERIORS(),
and CLASSATTS() in MS-ADTS. The updated section is attached.
Please review it and let us know if you see any problem.
I don't think the new definiton of POSSSUPERIORS() makes any sense. In
particular, it
Hi, Tridge,
We reproduced the behavior by running your Python script with latest Samba
tree against Windows server. After further review, we confirmed that your
description of behaviors is correct. This is a documentation issue that we are
going to fix in MS-ADTS.
For the definitions
