Glen,
Thanks again. Really, I didn't mean to bash, really just trying to understand.
In fact your answer to Octavio sort of clarified the issue even further.
Cheers,
Nicola
> Subject: RE: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' license
> From: i...@bandshed.net
> To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no
>
Hi Again,
Well I'm not a lawyer either so we have something in common!
I've been distributing AV Linux like this since 2007 and to be honest
never have had this come up, I will have to scour the fine print a little
closer but I was under the impression that any derived work could be
licensed outs
Hi Octavio,
No the tweaks are not to the source otherwise I'd be sure to share them
here, unfortunately my cranium is a little too small to tackle the source
code.
The tweaks are basically in the packaging and on the LiveDVD. I have
Cinelerra launch with a script and automatically finds and load
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:41:12 -0700, wrote:
I take a personal interest in it and have recently done a
lot of behind the scenes configuration work to make easier for new users
in the next AV Linux release.
Hi!
Did the above require changes to the source code?
--
Octavio.
___
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:41:12 -0700, wrote:
I take a personal interest in it and have recently done a
lot of behind the scenes configuration work to make easier for new users
in the next AV Linux release.
Hi!
Have these tweaks needed any kind of source code modification?
--
Octavio.
__
Glen,
Thanks for the clarifications. Although I am not a lawyer, I have doubts about
the fact that the license in AV linux can be changed at the developer's
convenience, since it still is derived work. The GPL specifically says that
derived work qualifies for the GPL license itself. LGPL is mo
Hi fellow CinCV'ers
I recently was browsing the mail archives here and noticed some concern
over the AV Linux 5.0 release announcement I posted here in June. My
sincere apologies for not replying, at the time I was not a Cinelerra
mailing list subscriber so any replies to my announcement didn't co
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 03.10.2011 21:33, schrieb Einar Rünkaru:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Thank you, testers. Attached fix is created with your help.
>>
>> This patch is proposed for 2.2
>
> The following is a useful extension on top of your patch. Otherwise,
> with --enable
