You're better off saying:
class class-default
police ...
Don't use bultin class class-default in policy map!
Otherwise policy-map wan't work. Tested on IOS 12.1 and 12.2.
--
Andrew Degtiariov
DA-RIPE
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
hi
one of my customer has 7206 vxr router.
I installed pa-2fe card into this router and we got crash problem when the
traffic goes through this card. and i decided to upgrade the ios
after upgrade the crash problem was fixed. but this time the voip connection
with the remote office was lost
When installing a 10G interface, we tried copying the ipv6 address from
the GigaE port:
ipv6 address 2001:xxx:0:B::1/64
IOS 12.2(18)SXE6b says:
2001:xxx:0:B::1/64 can not be configured on TenGigabitEthernet10/1, in use
The new 10Gig port is in shutdown. Makes no difference if we try copying
the
Hi,
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:45:21PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
When installing a 10G interface, we tried copying the ipv6 address from
the GigaE port:
ipv6 address 2001:xxx:0:B::1/64
IOS 12.2(18)SXE6b says:
2001:xxx:0:B::1/64 can not be configured on TenGigabitEthernet10/1, in use
On Monday 07 May 2007 15:34, Pete Templin wrote:
True, but distribute lists can be more powerful.
I'm curious... in what way distribute lists would be more
flexible than prefix lists (perhaps I've been using prefix lists
far too long). Might you have an example?
Mark.
pgpCvKhHhboKl.pgp
Have you tried using 'snmp-server ifindex persist'? It locks the index
values through a reboot.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Phil Mayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 8:03 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Supervisor Engine memory snmp
chiel wrote:
Not
Can the Cisco 2851 with 256MB handle a full Internet routing table and
be our backup connection to our 2nd provider? I believe it's fast
enough to do 10 - 20 Mbs throughput which is fine for us.
Thanks,
Brian
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:42:10AM -0400, Toomey, Brian wrote:
Can the Cisco 2851 with 256MB handle a full Internet routing table and
be our backup connection to our 2nd provider? I believe it's fast
enough to do 10 - 20 Mbs throughput which is fine for us.
With 512MB RAM it'll do just fine.
Hello Everyone,
I have been working on a 3750 that has a high cpu usage and wanted to
ask for some help.
My first thought was tcam space , but that was ok and I don't see any
bad adjacencies or routes.
The switch has high interupt cpu levels and checking into it I have
found that it seems to be
Toomey, Brian wrote:
Can the Cisco 2851 with 256MB handle a full Internet routing table and
be our backup connection to our 2nd provider? I believe it's fast
enough to do 10 - 20 Mbs throughput which is fine for us.
256 MB is cutting it *very* close for a full feed and will almost
certainly
Toomey, Brian wrote:
Have you tried using 'snmp-server ifindex persist'? It locks the index
values through a reboot.
Yeah, sure. Of ifindices.
The indices of the table in questions are ENTITY-MIB entPhysicalIndex
values and though they'll probably stay constant on a given box *WILL*
vary
I can't believe that I'm emailing this list for something so stupid..
I have a 1721 doing PAT for some VoIP (SNOM) phones connected to an Asterisk
(1.2.10) box. Customer experiences intermittent one-way audio on calls.
Blah blah -- it's nat. Yay for me.
Does anybody have this router in a
12 matches
Mail list logo