Hi
How can I see what BGP communities are being sent to me via BGP on a Cisco
box. With Foundry I can use the command 'sh ip bgp neighbors xx.xx.xx.xx
routes detail' and the output will give me detailed information including what
communities are being sent i.e.
sh ip bgp neighbors
Mark Tech wrote on Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:03 AM:
Hi
How can I see what BGP communities are being sent to me via BGP on
a Cisco box. With Foundry I can use the command 'sh ip bgp neighbors
xx.xx.xx.xx routes detail' and the output will give me detailed
information including what
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:35:18AM +0900, Hiromasa Sekiguchi wrote:
Does cisco products support LFS function of 802.3ae?
We have a WS-X6704-10GE.
Sure. You can verify its operation by disconnecting just one fibre
- both interfaces will go down immediately. This also works on
1GE connections,
Thank you for your advice.
If we don't need LFS function (e.g. use BFD), can we disable it?
Please let me know the commands how to do it.
Regards,
Hiromasa
Marian Ďurkovič wrote [2007/12/12 18:42(JST)]:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:35:18AM +0900, Hiromasa Sekiguchi wrote:
Does cisco products
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:21:22PM +0900, Hiromasa Sekiguchi wrote:
Thank you for your advice.
If we don't need LFS function (e.g. use BFD), can we disable it?
Why would you like to do this? LFS / Remote fault detection is much faster
and triggers reconvergence immediately - so it's good to
I understand LFS/RF is much faster.
I'd like to only know whether we can disable it or not.
Regards,
Hiromasa
Marian Ďurkovič wrote [2007/12/12 19:54(JST)]:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:21:22PM +0900, Hiromasa Sekiguchi wrote:
Thank you for your advice.
If we don't need LFS function (e.g.
DAVID Sébastien wrote on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 8:56 AM:
Hi,
I'm trying to set up my network with a tacacs server based on debian
for authentification.
Everything works correctly but I meet difficulties to limit the
commands in configure mode
How does your aaa config look
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ziad Majzoub) [Tue 11 Dec 2007, 04:07 CET]:
I'm seeing underruns errors on local STM1 interface,
on the remote router i'm seeing runts, aborts and imput errors
the controller is clean(during a certain period).
Try switching both to line clock source if there is SDH
Niels, are you suggesting clock source internal , on both ends ?
BTW there is definitely some SDH equipment on the path
regards
On Dec 12, 2007 7:38 AM, Niels Bakker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ziad Majzoub) [Tue 11 Dec 2007, 04:07 CET]:
I'm seeing underruns errors on local
We have a unique situation where our transport equipment can't bridge the
traffic between two endpoints, so we would like to dump off each link's VLAN
onto our router (7609-S with WS-X6748-GE-TX blades) where it can perform the
bridging. Any reason why the following configuration wouldn't work?
Well, If I understand you are talking about inter-vlan bridging. Yes it
should work fine. You may need to add
bridge 2 protocol ieee
It's bridge protocol global configuration command to define the type fo STP.
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:58:07PM -0500, Furnish, Trever G wrote:
Under what circumstances would CDP show more than one neighbor on the
same port?
dumb switch in between (that floods CDP packets to all ports,
instead of handling them itself).
We have a site where the local IT staff is
Furnish, Trever G wrote:
Under what circumstances would CDP show more than one neighbor on the
same port?
If those are 35nnXL switches with gigastack modules, that's what you
get... gigastack is essentially a shared half-duplex bus.
Jeff
___
Under what circumstances would CDP show more than one neighbor on the
same port?
We have a site where the local IT staff is claiming that a switch
interface (switch2 g0/2) is connected directly to exactly one other
cisco switch, but 'show cdp nei' on switch 2 shows three other switches
as
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 2:12 PM
To: Furnish, Trever G
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CDP -- more than one neighbor on the same port?
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:58:07PM -0500,
Yes i have enable aaa command :
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login telnet group tacacs+ enable
aaa authentication login console group tacacs+ enable
aaa authentication enable default group tacacs+ enable
aaa authorization exec default group tacacs+ if-authenticated none
aaa authorization
sigh That would be exactly it. I guess it should have clicked when
he said they were connected in a stack -- my head just refuses to accept
the idea that a series of switches would be connected via a half-duplex
stacking bus. :-(
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kell [mailto:[EMAIL
Did you mean bridge 2 protocol vlan-bridge?
I suggest you read this Cisco document before you consider doing this:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/inter-vlan_11072.pdf
HTH,
Fred Reimer, CISSP, CCNP, CQS-VPN, CQS-ISS
Senior Network Engineer
Coleman Technologies, Inc.
954-298-1697
On 12/12/2007, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{cut}
In non-vrf situation I would use next-hop-self before advertising the
/16 to all the other peers, that would force the lookup on the router
that knows about the /24s. Is there a way to do this lookup when the
routes
I don't know if something like this is even possible so I figured I would
ask. I was wondering if there was any type of software out there that would
monitor traffic leaving the network and display reports about which
ASN/Providers they are going down. This would be useful for determining
On Dec 12, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Shaun R. wrote:
This would be useful for determining
what providers I should peer with next. For example if the
software showed
that 50% of my traffic was destined to travel to or across Level3
then it
would be beneficial for me to bring in a pipe from
Sure..
Check out stager http://software.uninett.no/stager or FlowViewer
http://ensight.eos.nasa.gov/FlowViewer/ coupled with netflow data exports..
both have nice web front ends to allow you to slice and dice your netflow
data. Of course your router will need full routes so it knows
Something like Netflow peer-as export?
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cg/honf_c/chap10/onf_dbgp.pdf
Greets,
Bernd
Shaun R. schrieb:
I don't know if something like this is even possible so I figured I would
ask. I was wondering if there was any type of
I'm not looking for MRTG. I'm looking for a traffic analyzer.
'Ooooh. Traffic analysis.. Netflow! You seek Netflow!'
- billn
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Shaun R. wrote:
I don't know if something like this is even possible so I figured I would
ask. I was wondering if there was any type of software
Yes, I've read it, and the proposed topology is simple enough I don't think
the points raised in the documentation will be an issue.
Worst case, we could burn up two ethernet ports and use a cross-over cable
between the two VLANs.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Fred Reimer
Protocol 'ieee' is not an option, but 'vlan-bridge' is. I've applied it to
the global config.
Anything in:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2005-May/020444.html
that would suggest this is not enough?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Masood Ahmad Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FlowViewer v3.3 is now available with a number of new useful features.
FlowViewer is a web front-end to the flow-tools open-source netflow
capture and analysis tool suite. FlowViewer provides textual and graphical
analysis tools, as well as long term tracking for specified flows. The
With exported netflow data and FlowViewer/flow-tools (coincidently just
announced FlowViewer v3.3) you could set up FlowTrackings for each peer
(via next-hop IP address) and examine them after a period to see the
relative loads.
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/12/2007 03:42:51 PM:
I don't
Hello,
If I recall correctly, fall-back bridging is only for non-ip traffic.
Though I haven't tested it I believe your configuration with the
addition
of bridge 2 protocol ieee should work.
Rich
I believe what you propose (fall-back bridging) will work,
but will be performed in software.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron) [Wed 12 Dec 2007, 16:57 CET]:
You should try clock s internal first if you have SDH gear in the middle.
Um, no. Exactly the opposite. Please read what I actually wrote: clock
source line. Use internal on one side only if you have a back-to-back
link only, or a
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:23:57AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:33:55AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Router#sh run | i prox
ip arp proxy disable
Router#sh run int g0/1 | i prox
Router#sh ip int g0/1 | i Prox
Proxy ARP is enabled
I've verified
Hello Daniel:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Roesen
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:11 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] unwanted arp reply traffic at IX
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at
DAVID Sébastien mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, December 12,
2007 8:29 PM:
Yes i have enable aaa command :
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login telnet group tacacs+ enable
aaa authentication login console group tacacs+ enable
aaa authentication enable default group tacacs+
Pshem Kowalczyk wrote on Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:22 PM:
On 12/12/2007, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{cut}
In non-vrf situation I would use next-hop-self before advertising
the /16 to all the other peers, that would force the lookup on the
router that knows
34 matches
Mail list logo
