Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 7200 config clarification

Hi Jose, On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:44 -0500, Jose wrote: Peter Rathlev wrote: Port mode (physical-physical) works on 6500 SXF, not 7600 SXF (or 12.2SR at all?) according to FN. Very strange, but one of the few feature differences between 6500 and 7600 on SXF. I'm familiar with

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 7200 config clarification

On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:28 +0100, Michel Renfer wrote: EoMPLS Port Mode uses a physical interface to transport raw Ethernet frames, not just a single VLAN, which means you can run trunks through it. We use it as a cheap way of having local switching using LAN cards. How do you

Re: [c-nsp] ASA dropped packets from NMS

Ben Steele wrote: Do you have an IPS module installed (ie AIP-SSM-10 etc.)? If not then it maybe something being caught by ip audit if you have that configured to drop packets upon a match, sh ip audit count will give you stats on that, is there any rate-limiting configured? Thanks for the

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 bgp

At 11:42 AM 06-02-08 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm playing with IPv6 on some test routers. I noticed that sh ip bgp sum does not give information about IPv6 neighbors. IOS running on the boxes is 12.3(20). Is there an IOS version that has show commands regarding bgp and IPv6 ? sho

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 bgp

Hello, On 2/6/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm playing with IPv6 on some test routers. I noticed that sh ip bgp sum does not give information about IPv6 neighbors. IOS running on the boxes is 12.3(20). Is there an IOS version that has show commands regarding bgp and

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 bgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm playing with IPv6 on some test routers. I noticed that sh ip bgp sum does not give information about IPv6 neighbors. IOS running on the boxes is 12.3(20). Is there an IOS version that has show commands regarding

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 bgp

Use : ipv6-gw#sh bgp ipv6 ? X:X:X:X::X/0-128 IPv6 prefix network/length community Display routes matching the communities community-list Display routes matching the community-list dampened-paths Display paths suppressed due to dampening filter-list

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 bgp

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm playing with IPv6 on some test routers. I noticed that sh ip bgp sum does not give information about IPv6 neighbors. IOS running on the boxes is 12.3(20). Is there an IOS version that has show commands regarding bgp and IPv6 ? Use

[c-nsp] SPANTREE-SP-2-RECV_BAD_TLV

Hi, 6509_AEthernet_SW_Nortel_A-...-Ethernet_SW_Nortel_B6509_B From the logs of 6509_A, I get the following message (I got 12 of them in 24 hours): -- Feb 5 08:38:32 6509_A: %SPANTREE-SP-2-RECV_BAD_TLV: Received SSTP BPDU with bad TLV on GigabitEthernet1/31 VLAN21. Feb 5 08:38:32

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 bgp

:- Hank == Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, a. rahman isnaini r.sutan wrote: Similar output : sh bgp s = sh bgp ipv6 summary Not on 12.2(18)SXF: petach-tikva-gp#sho bgp sum Maybe he meant sh bgp all sum for the 7600 platform ? sh

Re: [c-nsp] SPANTREE-SP-2-RECV_BAD_TLV

Thanks for your so prompt answer. I may be wrong, but I believe SSTP is better known as per VLAN STP (PVST+). The 6509 is probably complaining that its receiving a regular 802.1D BPU when its expecting a PVSTP+ BPDU on vlans 21 and 60. Both 6509 are configured to use STP in PVST+ mode.

Re: [c-nsp] pix question

For some reason, I can't do that, it is strange :-/ El mié, 06-02-2008 a las 08:25 -0500, Jason Lixfeld escribió: You can just log in to it (the passive/standby node) directly and do a show ver. On 6-Feb-08, at 8:15 AM, ultramajestic wrote: Hi, is there anyway to see the serial number

Re: [c-nsp] USB to serial converter

The Belkins work fine with MacOS X if you use the open source driver from sourceforge. Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ramcharan, Vijay A Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:05 AM To: Cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] USB to serial

[c-nsp] Replacement part for Rack mount kits

Hi We have few old Catalyst 4003 and Catalyst 4006 chassis which we'd like to use again. But we don't have rack-mount kits for them. Do anyone have idea can we just order rack-mount kits for different Cisco model ? Maybe rack-mount kits from Cat6503 cat fit for Catalyst 4003 chassis ? Thanks for

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 7200 config clarification

I've used this to fake local switching as well and it works fine. Since another limitation is the inability to do VPLS, you have to work with hokey solutions or purchase expensive gear, or use another vendor. Phil On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:54 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote: On Wed, 2008-02-06 at

Re: [c-nsp] SPANTREE-SP-2-RECV_BAD_TLV

Jean-Christophe Varaillon wrote: Thanks for your so prompt answer. I may be wrong, but I believe SSTP is better known as per VLAN STP (PVST+). The 6509 is probably complaining that its receiving a regular 802.1D BPU when its expecting a PVSTP+ BPDU on vlans 21 and 60. Both 6509 are

Re: [c-nsp] pix question

Can you be a little more clear on what I can't do that means? Can you not login to the standby? Can you not run a show ver on the standby? Is your failover working? What does show failover show when you run that on the active PIX? On 6-Feb-08, at 11:05 AM, ultramajestic wrote: For

Re: [c-nsp] SPANTREE-SP-2-RECV_BAD_TLV

Can you clarify the type of Nortel switch the service provider is using? Nortel OM3500 / 5200 / 6500 are transport nodes that support point to point Ethernet services and can pass clear 802.1q frames with no problems. It sounds like the Nortel switches are sending 802.1d BPDUs on the

[c-nsp] SNMPv3 bug on 3550

Hey all, I'm seeing the following behavior on 3550s running c3550-ipbasek9-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin: Commands entered: snmp-server user testuser testgroup v3 auth md5 (password) access 98 snmp-server group testgroup v3 auth not *tv....FF access 98 snmp-server host

[c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

Hi I have installed WS-X6348-RJ-45 card in Catalyst 6500/Sup32 and I saw increasing output drops on each FE interface. Currently I'm using only 3 ports on this card (Fa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/48). Avarage traffic level on each port is about 10-20Mbps. I also didn't saw large traffic peaks like 80Mb on

Re: [c-nsp] SNMPv3 bug on 3550

Thanks. I did try it that way too. Long log shows it doing this: PSRB-U00-OS-03(config)#do sh run | i test PSRB-U00-OS-03(config)#do sh snmp user PSRB-U00-OS-03(config)#do sh snmp group PSRB-U00-OS-03(config)#snmp-server group testgroup v3 auth access 98 PSRB-U00-OS-03(config)#do sh run | i

Re: [c-nsp] SNMPv3 bug on 3550

Sorry about the empty mail before, was busy wiping up coffee from my keyboard. :-) I've tested the same on our 3550/SEE2's and with the same results. Trial and error shows that if I exclude the auth md5 blah part of the user definition, everything works as expected. It doesn't help using SHA.

Re: [c-nsp] Question about ip rtp header-compression

Ziv Leyes wrote: The problem is I'm not using NONE of the possible queuing strategies at all right now! So why the line can't just use the whole 2Mb for RTP? My question wasn't about if you want to dedicate a specific bandwidth with some QoS policy then you'll be obviously limited to 75% or

[c-nsp] Best Cisco 3620 IOS

I've got a Cisco 3620 here that I've been playing around with. I'm wondering if anyone knows the best version of IOS that would run on it. I understand that you need to have a minimum amount of memory to run some version of IOS and I'm willing to buy some more RAM for this machine if that's what

Re: [c-nsp] Best Cisco 3620 IOS

You can figure out the memory/flash requirements from the IOS upgrade planner easily enough: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/Iosplanner/Planner-tool/iosplanner .cgi? Your memory requirements are a mix of major revision and feature set. Since you've got 40/8, looks like latest 12.2.46a