Hi Dan
add bandwidth 100 command under the ethernet interface terminates this
connection and shaping should work , we'll need shaping instead of policing
best regards
--Abo Zaid
On 4/25/08, Dan Letkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luan,
I have tried this, but it doesn't seem to take
The ports on the HWIC-4ESW (as well as on the other other switch modules
for the ISRs) generally don't support the same set of QoS features as
the regular L3 interfaces, so you can't shape on these ports. Can you
move your uplink to one of the built-in FE ports instead?
oli
Dan Letkeman
Hi,
* Gary Roberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, an update for anyone who is interested.
track 123 ip sla 1 reachability
ip sla 1
icmp-echo 10.40.1.1
timeout 1000
threshold 2
frequency 3
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
ip route 88.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.40.1.1 track 123
If
On 25/04/2008, at 3:58 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
The ports on the HWIC-4ESW (as well as on the other other switch
modules
for the ISRs) generally don't support the same set of QoS features as
the regular L3 interfaces, so you can't shape on these ports. Can
you
move your
Hello,
I tried to enable Qos between to routers. I checked configurations on
several sites but didn't get it to work.
here are the relevant parts of the configs:
On the CE router:
class-map match-all FTP-server
match access-group 110
!
policy-map FTP
class FTP-server
priority percent 75
!
Alex,
if you use the MQC percent keyword, make sure you set your interface
bandwidth accordingly. What does show policy-map interface tell you
about the bandwidth for the class you've used?
I wouldn't use priority queue for this, bandwidth (as used on the
PE) is just fine for this.
oli
Hello list,
We're looking at swapping out our sup32 + 6148-GE for the 4948.
Performance wise it seems that the 4948 is a very clear winner, as the
6148 linecard is oversubscribed 8:1 and can only do 8 Gbit/s total.
We're worried about what features we're loosing when going this route.
You need a Sup2+, Sup3, Sup4 or Sup5 to run IOS and do L3/4 stuff in the
switch. The original Sup2 uses CatOS, and even on that you should have 2x GE
ports, not just one. Granted IOS is nice, but if you just want basic managed
switching, CatOS works well on the beasties..
---
Howard Leadmon
remember that the priority command POLICES to a bitrate, not shapes.
When you police a TCP session, things start to go terribly wrong with CA
windows etc.
So shape the traffic before you police it.
regards,
Dirk-Jan
ps. why are you prioritizing FTP traffic?
pps. if you are going to allocate
I've got a situation where I have several (older) remote sites connected to a
central site via ATM (they're being phased out for the most part). I need to
find a way to have one particular vlan at each site assigned to a couple of
ports on a switch at the central site. This only needs to be
That's kind of what I thought. I will be able to move it over to the
FE port soon.
So on the config for the shaping command, I create the class, match
anything, create the policy, assign the class, and enter the shape
command:
bandwidth 10M
shape peak 13M
(this should not allow any more
No congestion... no qos scheduling :-)
Rachid
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Oliver Boehmer
(oboehmer)
Envoyé : vendredi 25 avril 2008 13:36
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Objet : Re: [c-nsp] Qos between CE and PE
Thanks - it kind of complicates things internally a couple of other
folks had suggested this as well which I expected (and appreciate).
I guess my question is whether there is *any* other solutions away from
doing it dynamically via Radius? I was thinking of some form of static
routing
the following config should work:
policy-map FOO
class class-default
shape average 1300
int fastethernet x/y
service-policy output FOO
please take a look at CCO command reference (for example
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/command/reference/qrfcmd9.h
tml#wp1077189) to see
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Paul Stewart wrote:
Without messing with Radius, what options do I have to inject these routes
towards the endpoints when they are changing different devices all the time?
This seems like such a simple question but I have yet to come up with an
elegant solution ;) I was
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned using a simple Committed Access
Rate (CAR). It may not be the new hotness but it's simple, it works and
works just about everywhere.
interface Vlan XYZ
rate-limit input 1000 conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
rate-limit output
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 01:12:14AM +0200, Sidney Boumendil wrote:
(remember OIR ie hot swap of PA is not supported on 7200 platform)?
7200s perfectly well support PA OIR.
Only the I/O-Board (and NPE) are not hot-swappable.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
I think the 7200 platform is the only one from Cisco where I have never
had a OIR hiccup.
Gert Doering wrote:
7200s perfectly well support PA OIR.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Jason Berenson wrote:
Never had a hiccup? I'd say 70% of the time the router falls on its face...
For 7500s, I can second that - but for the 7200, never ever any problem.
(Non-VXRs VXRs, everything from NPE-150 to NPE-G1, IOS 11.1, 11.1CC to
12.3
Gert Doering wrote:
For 7500s, I can second that - but for the 7200, never ever any problem.
On a 7500, if it was VIP based I would pretty much guarantee that the
router would require a reload - Even manually forcing a bus stall rather
than expecting the card insertion to do it right. The
Hey everyone, I wanted to find out what everyone is using to aggregate
customer T1 links. We're using the 7206VXR platform with NPE-G2 filled
to the hilt with PA-MC-2T3+ cards, including the PA Jacket card slot.
The second question I have is if anyone else is using this same
solution, how are you
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:20:25AM -0400, Steven Pfister wrote:
I've got a situation where I have several (older) remote sites connected to a
central site via ATM (they're being phased out for the most part). I need to
find a way to have one particular vlan at each site assigned to a couple
On Friday 25 April 2008, Steven Pfister wrote:
I've got a situation where I have several (older) remote sites connected to
a central site via ATM (they're being phased out for the most part). I need
to find a way to have one particular vlan at each site assigned to a couple
of ports on a
[I know, replying to my own message is poor form, but I forgot to show how to
add an ELAN]
On Friday 25 April 2008, Lamar Owen wrote:
lane database parilane
name pari server-atm-address 47.003CA700.0090BF2EF071.C0
default-name pari
Here's where you would add an ELAN
Justin,
Yes I tried that and it did work, but I think shaping is the preferred
method for us.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned using a simple Committed Access Rate
(CAR). It may not be the new hotness
Thanks
So if I go the radius route, if there a way for me to inject a /32 for the
connection itself and then inject a route towards that /32?
Take care,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 12:04 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
So if I go the radius route, if there a way for me to inject a /32 for the
connection itself and then inject a route towards that /32?
That's pretty much what Framed-IP-Route does.
(Not that there's a technical difference
Gert Doering wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
So if I go the radius route, if there a way for me to inject a /32 for the
connection itself and then inject a route towards that /32?
That's pretty much what Framed-IP-Route does.
(Not that there's a
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Marlow, Travis wrote:
Hey everyone, I wanted to find out what everyone is using to aggregate
customer T1 links. We're using the 7206VXR platform with NPE-G2 filled
to the hilt with PA-MC-2T3+ cards, including the PA Jacket card slot.
The second question I have is if
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Paul Stewart wrote:
Thanks
So if I go the radius route, if there a way for me to inject a /32 for the
connection itself and then inject a route towards that /32?
Framed-IP-Address = 10.0.0.1,
Framed-Route = 192.168.1.0/29 10.0.0.1 1,
On 4/25/08, Gert Doering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7200s perfectly well support PA OIR.
My mistake :)
Must have confused with modular routers and NM.
Sidney
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Thanks... that's exactly what I needed - will talk to our sys admin etc..
Thanks Dave as well for your reply and everyone else...;)
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Jon Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 1:01 PM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Assuming everything is dynamic, Framed-Address will set the remote side
IP (you will need to use Framed-Netmask to set it to a /32). Then you
can use Framed-Route to add a route pointing to that /32.
Paul Stewart wrote:
Thanks
So if I go the radius route, if there a way for me to inject
On Apr 25, 2008, at 2:03 PM, David Coulson wrote:
Assuming everything is dynamic, Framed-Address will set the remote
side
IP (you will need to use Framed-Netmask to set it to a /32). Then you
can use Framed-Route to add a route pointing to that /32.
Framed-Netmask is assumed all ones if
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:04:24PM +0200, Sidney Boumendil wrote:
On 4/25/08, Gert Doering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7200s perfectly well support PA OIR.
My mistake :)
Must have confused with modular routers and NM.
Those are a bit funny indeed - 3660s actually support hot-swap,
35 matches
Mail list logo
