You might want to check back on the mail and the context the phrase was used in.
As the path was coming in from two different Ases using MED it wasn't working.
He could have configured the end router to always compare MED, but by default
it won't be used.
Brian
-Original Message-
2008/5/29 Burton Windle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've got a 6500 with a Sup720 running 12.2(33)SXH1 with, among others, a
WS-X6748-GE-TX blade. A port on the 6748 is seeing unusual port counters,
where every RxPause frame is counted as a multicast packet (or vice versa,
not sure which). Is this
Last week our Catalyst 3550 running with hi CPU load:
sw#sh proc cpu sorted | ex 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
CPU utilization for five seconds: 90%/34%; one minute: 91%; five minutes: 91%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
8748708768 21381222 54.79%
We have a netflow collector from a Large Software Vendor on loan.
Said vendor waltzed in and coolly dropped into the conversation yeah
we'll be needing you to drop your flow timers to 60 seconds, including
the active flows timer, else we won't get good results
I was... less than impressed.
On May 30, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
We have a netflow collector from a Large Software Vendor on loan.
Said vendor waltzed in and coolly dropped into the conversation
yeah we'll be needing you to drop your flow timers to 60 seconds,
including the active flows timer, else we
Hello,
Is there anyway to block skype traffic with the cisco firewall IOS?
Thanks,
Dan.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
It's possible that FN is wrong. What feature set are you using? Do you
have 'memory-size iomem' configured on the router? Or something along
those lines, if memory serves me right (pun intended). I believe the
2600s and 3600s supported the command. Dedicating a large amount to
iomem might
