I've seen the transport address being used in some cases where the LDP
router-ID is not advertised in IGP (for whatever reason), but these were
corner cases..
I've had to use it when there were vendor interop-problems, the LDP
session wouldn't come up otherwise. I even posted to the IETF
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:15:13PM -0400, Pete S. wrote:
The biggest running issue I have with SXH,
My biggest issues are:
- no BFD on SVIs (worked fine in SXF)
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
(SXH3 regularily forgets to send withdraws to iBGP peers if a prefix
completely
You can use saa on cisco routers to simmulate traffic and gather stats (jitter
packet loss ecc).
That won't tell if the ports oare open but you can check line quality ecc.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk869/tk769/technologies_white_paper09186a00801b1a1e.shtml
Brian
-Original
I said real because I'm thinking test router where other persons use it to
test.
But this BGP router have no impact on internet.
This platform could be automatic with a form and give you an unused private
AS number in their tables :p
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 6:47 PM, julien leroiso [EMAIL
I said real because I'm thinking test router where other persons use it to
test.
But this BGP router have no impact on internet.
This platform could be automatic with a form and give you an unused private
AS number in their tables :p
Do you mean something like http://noc.mono-ix.net/?
are you using ES20's? beware of CSCsm61571
--
deejay
-Original Message-
From: Liviu Pislaru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 August 2008 08:56
To: Tomas Daniska
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SRB4 (was RE: SRC2?)
hi,
i'm running SRB4 on WS-SUP720-3BXL
Stephen-
If L3 is handing this OC3 off to you inside your building, the SMI card
is fine. It's technically rated at 9 miles between stations, so unless
you're farther than that from the hand off, you're all set.
Stephen Kratzer wrote:
All,
We're looking to turn up an OC3 with Level3, but
This is a mystery to me:
I've got a few new VS-S720-10G-3C Sups that work just fine with Kingston 1GB
CF. I've also got some old SUP720-3Bs that refuse to recognise anything
other than Cisco CF. Tried formatting, upgrading rommon (8.5(2)), dd'ing
Cisco flash to Kingston etc. This is under
Nic,
Not familiar with L2TP in particular, but working with MLPPP in other
contexts, it is usually necessary to specify a multilink group; i.e.
everywhere you have the ppp multilink command you may need a corresponding
ppp multilink group 1 command, to put all the links in the same bundle.
Hi,
Not a Cisco specific question, but thought this group
would have the best insight.
After 10 hours on the road, I'm more dopey than usual. Pull
into a Marriott, and of course the first thing I do is hook the laptop
up. Normally, during the FreeBSD boot process I stop it and
Sounds like the hotel is doing 2 things:
1) Proxy-arp on the router, giving you the MAC of the router when asking
for something outside of what it has configured or layer 3. Whatever is
doing the proxy arp must also be paying attention to who made the
request, and forwarding the return traffic to
So how is this possible? Is there a protocol or something I
haven't heard of? How would it know where my default gateway is?
(Maybe just reply to every ARP with the 192.168.50.1 address? Sorta
looks it.. I just ping'd something that doesn't exist, and got :
? (192.168.3.23) at
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:07:28AM -0700, John Jensen wrote:
Have you tried looking at the CISCO-ERR-DISABLE-MIB file?
You can download it here:
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-ERR-DISABLE-MIB.my
Somehow that was missing from the pack of Cisco MIBs I downloaded and
pull my MIBs
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 09:09 -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
This is a mystery to me:
I've got a few new VS-S720-10G-3C Sups that work just fine with Kingston 1GB
CF. I've also got some old SUP720-3Bs that refuse to recognise anything
other than Cisco CF. Tried formatting, upgrading rommon (8.5(2)),
That's true, but the Cisco 1GB CF I borrowed from a S720-10G for a test
seems to work okay. So I'm still scratching my head.
At this point I'm probably going to spring for the Cisco CF, but I'd rather
know that I could mix-n-match.
Tim:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Peter Rathlev [EMAIL
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:15:13PM -0400, Pete S. wrote:
The biggest running issue I have with SXH,
My biggest issues are:
- no BFD on SVIs (worked fine in SXF)
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
(SXH3 regularily forgets to send withdraws to iBGP peers
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 16:53 +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
According to the data sheet[1] the Sup720 only supports up to 512MB
flash. We use 512MB cards in a range of 6500s with Sup720 HW-revisions
2.1, 4.3 and 5.2 without problems. Haven't tried 1GB though.
The data sheet ([1]) would of course
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:20:33AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
That's true, but the Cisco 1GB CF I borrowed from a S720-10G for a test
seems to work okay. So I'm still scratching my head.
At this point I'm probably going to spring for the Cisco CF, but I'd rather
know that I could mix-n-match.
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:02:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
Yes, the nasty BGP bug is present. The only solution seems to be a
periodically clear ip bgp all.
Cisco IOS Software, s6523_rp Software (s6523_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M),
Version 12.2(33)SXH3,
I have a situation where I need to run MPLS across a non-MPLS network (the
Internet) to connect two of my networks together. We have looked at GRE,
but ran into issues and were later told by Cisco that running MPLS over GRE
is unsupported.
Any ideas as to a solution to this problem, aside from
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:02:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
Yes, the nasty BGP bug is present. The only solution seems to be a
periodically clear ip bgp all.
Cisco IOS Software, s6523_rp Software
l2tpv3
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Greg Schwimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a situation where I need to run MPLS across a non-MPLS network (the
Internet) to connect two of my networks together. We have looked at GRE,
but ran into issues and were later told by Cisco that running MPLS
Hi,
I'm seeing leaky SoO in 12.4M (prefixes get advertised back to sites
with same SoO they came from), possibly down to CSCek73579, I notice
there are no first-fixed-in 12.4M or 12.2SB targets, would somebody on
here from cisco mind taking a look at the internal notes and tell me if
this bug
Hmm. I've got a handful of Kingston cards that work on both 3B/3C and a
handful that work only on 3C.
Those that don't work give an error on read/format:
%Error show disk0: (no such device)
Tim:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at
I'm playing with IPv6 on a 3750. Looking at the release notes for
12.2(46)SE, I see the following limitation for IPv6 access lists:
* The switch does not support output port ACLs.
It's currently running 12.2(25)SEE and I tested statements like permit
tcp any host x:x:x:x:2d0:b7ff:fee6:574 eq 80
On Sep 2, 2008, at 8:38 AM, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
Not a Cisco specific question, but thought this group
would have the best insight.
After 10 hours on the road, I'm more dopey than usual. Pull
into a Marriott, and of course the first thing I do is hook the laptop
up.
David,
This seems to be an EIGRP related bug.
I sent a quick note to the DE regarding the fix in the listed
releases...
Arie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Freedman
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 21:33 PM
To:
Hello,
Why do I get every mails in double ?
In a week, I get 10131 mails.
- dan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
I know I don't see much on ACNS here, but was hoping someone might have
worked with the ACNS software more than I have, as it's pretty new to me.
I have a Content Engine 590 here I am working with, running ACNS 5.9.11,
using WCCPv2, and overall it's working well. The problem I am running into
IP3 http://www.ip3.com/ is also a big one that does this type of stuff.
I would say 90% of laptop users who travel, know they need to change to a
dynamic IP DNS. This whole hacking the way IP works, really sucks. It
leads to all sorts of weird problems, Just to save you a couple of support
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 22:53:56 Peter Rathlev wrote:
According to the data sheet[1] the Sup720 only supports
up to 512MB flash. We use 512MB cards in a range of 6500s
with Sup720 HW-revisions 2.1, 4.3 and 5.2 without
problems. Haven't tried 1GB though.
When we were upgrading from the
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 22:53:56 Peter Rathlev wrote:
According to the data sheet[1] the Sup720 only supports
up to 512MB flash. We use 512MB cards in a range of 6500s
with Sup720 HW-revisions 2.1, 4.3 and 5.2 without
problems. Haven't tried 1GB
32 matches
Mail list logo
