Re: [c-nsp] Cisco NAC

0n Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 06:28:54AM -0400, Steve Fischer wrote: Does anyone here use the Cisco NAC product? Is there a mailing list of which anyone knows specifically for Cisco NAC? User's group? Online community? Any assistance in directing me toward any of these resources

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 7507 vs ssg 550

Faisal, Why don't you take a look at a 7200/NPE-G2 (or even a 7201, which is a 1RU version of it). http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps341/index.html http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps341/product_data_sh eet0900aecd8047177b.html

Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco 12406 Etherchannel

Mark, you need 12.0(33)S to add SIP601 (it's an Engine5) GigE ports to a bundle.. take a look at the Feature History table in the link Leonardo quoted.. oli Mark Tech wrote on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 5:58 PM: Hi, thanks for that. Just had a look at my inventory sh inventory

Re: [c-nsp] MX960 vs Cisco 7600

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rubens, Even with no full-routing capability, one can still do L3 or L2 VPN Me6524 can't do L2VPN (VPLS), ATOM is supported though. Best Regards, - -- - -mat pgp-key 0x4E5EB11E -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

Re: [c-nsp] ME3750 Shaping

-Original Message- From: Brad Henshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 11:24 PM To: Eric Van Tol Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3750 Shaping Oh I'm sure it can do what you need - but only on 2 out of the 28 ports :-/ (which is

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 7507 vs ssg 550

Thanks Arie. We will definetly take that inconsideration. Subject: RE: [c-nsp] cisco 7507 vs ssg 550 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:02:40 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Faisal, Why don't you take a look at a 7200/NPE-G2 (or even a 7201, which is

Re: [c-nsp] SRC2?

It's already fixed in SRC and SRB4. That bug was only an issue in SRA throttle. Have you tried SRB4? On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote: We are also running in some bug ( CSCsk27643 ) and are hoping to see this fixed in SRC2. Anybody some tips to get PBR

[c-nsp] Weird SSH/Scheduler Error

Anyone seen this before? Just starting showing up on a 7206VXR w/NPE-2G running Advanced Enterprise Version 12.4(20)T Sep 17 11:40:23: %SCHED-7-WATCH: Attempt to enqueue uninitialized watched queue (address 0). -Process= SSH Process, ipl= 0, pid= 216, -Traceback= 0x14C4818 0x31F0B20 0x2E5F23C

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12406 Etherchannel

Yes, I've been waiting for link-agg on these SPA modules for AGES I don't even have any dates for when it will be available, its a major pain Use ECMP if you can... Dave,. Mark Tech wrote: Hi I am trying to configure Ethernchannel/link bundling on a 12406. The port channel seems to be

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS for IPv6: Passive Loopback Interface Address Not Propagated

Yes, I came across this on an upgrade from SB to SRC1 on 7200 didn't work until I configured ipv6 enable and ipv6 router isis on the loopback and then I was able to backtrack and do passive int lo0 in is-is to make it passive again, I thought it was just me! Dave. Mark Tinka wrote: On Tuesday

Re: [c-nsp] Weird SSH/Scheduler Error

http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2008-August/053776.html I ran into that traceback and some others when I upgraded to 20T. I ended up rolling back to 15T7. That actually caused me some problems too. On the 9-port HWIC I had a voice vlan configured on some devices that didn't need

Re: [c-nsp] OT - 802.3an - 10Gig over Cat 6a

I would recommended Juniper MX or EX Switches; it's time to enjoy line rate along with stable network operating system (JUNOS) + application/services ( MPLS, VPLS, QiQ etc) :) Regards, Masood BLOG: http://www.weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[c-nsp] boot sytem issue

helo guys,   We ran into a problem with a 3570 switch. we are trying to update IOS, keeping the current as second option , it accepts both boot system commands but doesn't update running-config and overwrites the existing entry in bootvar. here is the command output ...     Router(config)#boot

[c-nsp] boot sytem issue

helo guys,   We ran into a problem with a 3570 switch. we are trying to update IOS, keeping the current as second option , it accepts both boot system commands but doesn't update running-config and overwrites the existing entry in bootvar. here is the command output ...    

Re: [c-nsp] boot sytem issue

You might need to specify both boot-files on the same row. I think they should be separated by a semicolon, just do a ? to verify. boot system flash flash:/first-option;flash:/second-option Regards /Fredrik 2008/9/17, Alex Wa [EMAIL PROTECTED]: helo guys, We ran into a problem with a 3570

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 7507 vs ssg 550

You can't replace Cisco 7500 with SSG550 (Firewall); Coz POS (OC3) is currently not available for SSG platform; Second SSG can run screenos only not JUNOS; screenos is the operating system for integrated Firewall/IPSec VPN solutions. Third SSG purpose-built security appliance, I would definitely

Re: [c-nsp] SRC2?

I tried this feature on a 7200 with SRC1 (also on SB6). (SRB does not run on 7200). regards Rinse Rodney Dunn schreef: It's already fixed in SRC and SRB4. That bug was only an issue in SRA throttle. Have you tried SRB4? On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] OT - 802.3an - 10Gig over Cat 6a

How are the multicast issues doing on the Juniper platforms? tv - Original Message - From: Masood Ahmad Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Brad Henshaw' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Simon Hamilton-Wilkes' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September

[c-nsp] 5350XM ip-ip gateway problem handling 302 message

Scenario: AS5350XM running 12.4.15(T)7 with UBE (ip-ip gateway) code. This box is acting as a gateway supporting PRI trunks, a hosted VOIP provider, and some users connected by IP with SIP IADs. The hosted VoIP provider uses a hostname as the SIP peer for load-balancing and redundancy. When

[c-nsp] lots of flushes on interface

Hello, I'm trying to sort this out somehow but don't know where the problem is: The router is a 3845, ip cef enabled : C22#sh int gi0/0 | inc Input Input queue: 22/2000/0/3609 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 C22# interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xx3

Re: [c-nsp] Voice VLAN oddity (was Weird SSH/Scheduler Error)

I ran into that traceback and some others when I upgraded to 20T. I ended up rolling back to 15T7. That actually caused me some problems too. On the 9-port HWIC I had a voice vlan configured on some devices that didn't need it (printers, standalone computers). Previously with the 9T that

[c-nsp] Using generic Compact Flash in Cisco Routers...

So, does it work? Jonathan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Using generic Compact Flash in Cisco Routers...

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:14:30PM -0500, Jonathan Charles wrote: So, does it work? In general, yes. Some cards do not work properly depending on software/hardware combinations. YMMV. I recommend testing to validate your cards work in your environment. - Jared --

Re: [c-nsp] OT - 802.3an - 10Gig over Cat 6a

On Thursday 18 September 2008 01:47:18 Masood Ahmad Shah wrote: I would recommended Juniper MX or EX Switches; it's time to enjoy line rate along with stable network operating system (JUNOS) + application/services ( MPLS, VPLS, QiQ etc) :) Juniper's EX-series won't do MPLS (and it's

[c-nsp] Static Route based on next hop reachable

Hi there.. This is a bit of a long story .. But what we are looking for is to create a static route only if the next hop is reachable and directly connected. is this possible? I seem to remember there is a way to do this via IP SLA statements where if a condition is met then do X Can

Re: [c-nsp] Static Route based on next hop reachable

Hi Paul, Take a look at Policy based routing with object tracking. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk364/technologies_configuration_example 09186a0080211f5c.shtml Cheers, Aaron -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart Sent: