If you still have the problem, maybe you can try something, since I
once had a similar problem. There may a discrepancy between the
confreg on the RP and the SP. You need to set the confreg again. Even
though the remote command switch show bootvar command displayed the
right confreg in the SP in
Hi list,
I want to graph the in/out pps counter of every individual interface of
my routers, but I could not find the MIB for it. Anyone knows the MIB
for this?
Regards,
Samit
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:40:26AM -0800, Christian MacNevin wrote:
Am I the only one that's getting a bit wary of Cisco crowding their own
product space?
Different BUs fighting for revenue
God help anybody who deployed 7300s.
Or 7120, 7140, 7400, RSFC, or ...
gert
--
USENET is *not*
Hi Members,
i have a cisco switch model 3750 series but the switch ports stops working one
by one.
any help.
one end its connect to a trendNet switch( all ports on trend net are fine).
Chama
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Tolstykh, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Link to the release notes / new features etc.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/rel
ease/notes/ol_14271.html#wp4208036
Cisco promised us a lot of new IPv6-related features for SXI, including
IPv6 policy-based
Hello,
Is it possible to do packet capture or the like on a 6509 (or similar platform)
that doesn't have a FW module. I know I could do span port, but I'm interested
in knowing if there's any other method
Gabby.
Find your perfect match today at the new Yahoo!7 Dating. Get
Hroi Sigurdsson wrote:
Jared Mauch wrote:
It appears cisco released SXI already.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/Iosplanner/Planner-tool/iosplanner.cgi?release_name=12.2.33-SXImajorRel=12.2state=:RLtype=Early%20Deployment
It looks like there is support for multi-AF (v4/v6) VRFs.
On 13 Nov 2008, at 1:48 PM, Eslon BAchama wrote:
i have a cisco switch model 3750 series but the switch ports stops
working one by one.
Does it log anything to the console? Are any of the ports marked as
being in an error state?
G
___
Hroi Sigurdsson wrote:
Jared Mauch wrote:
It appears cisco released SXI already.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/Iosplanner/Planner-tool/iosplanner.cgi?release_name=12.2.33-SXImajorRel=12.2state=:RLtype=Early%20Deployment
It looks like there is support for multi-AF (v4/v6) VRFs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brandon,
2008/11/12 Brandon Price
I have a PE with 2 interfaces going to the same CE in vrf CUSTA.
I would like packets with a certain SOURCE ip to take interface 2 and
all other packets to follow normal routing in the vrf (interface 1).
How
Tim Durack wrote:
Hi,
I was hoping that
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/configuration/guide/vss.html
Software Features
With some exceptions, the virtual switching system has feature parity
with the standalone Catalyst 6500 series switch. Major
Hello,
According to a Sales Engineer at Cisco, this is going to be available some time
in H1 2009. It'll be a 48 port SFP line card if I remember correctly.
I'd love to have their roadmap for this switch.
Att,
Fernando
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
RFC 1213
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1
Inside you may find unicast packets and non unicast packets
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samit
Sent: giovedì 13 novembre 2008 9.36
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] interface
You can do packet captures with ELAM functionality.
That is generally used for hw forwarding troubleshooting though.
--- On Thu, 13/11/08, Gabby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Gabby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [c-nsp] packet capture on 6509??
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Thursday, 13
Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Tolstykh, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Link to the release notes / new features etc.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/rel
ease/notes/ol_14271.html#wp4208036
Cisco promised us a lot of new IPv6-related features for SXI, including
yes correct ! NSF is disabled
but if you look closely 'sh isis neig' command says capabale 'yes' ; but
ISIS adj command say NSF 'yes' which is misleading !
I have LDP GR also disabled. but when I failover RP's i do not see any
traffic loss.
have you tested !
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:14 AM,
I'm looking for some pointers on what are the smallest recommeded Cisco
boxes to use for a small multihoming solution.
2 full BGP views (approx 260k routes each)
100 Mbps bandwidth requirement.
The setup currently uses 2 Juniper M5 but those are in dire need of refresh.
What is the appropiate
You may want to consider getting either part # CISCO7201 (PSU
included) or 7206VXR/NPE-G2 (you need to pay for the PSU, it's quite
cheap).
Both the part # for the box, shouldn't be much of a difference or same.
--raymondh
On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Magnus Eriksson wrote:
I'm looking for
hmmm.interesting question. VRF aware PBR wouldn't help.
You had better try it in the labbut I wonder along Mat's suggestion
if you could build a gre tunnel over interface 1 and apply a PBR
policy on the tunnel. Thinking that after the mpls disposition the
ingress features (pbr) on the
Jared Mauch wrote:
It appears cisco released SXI already.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/Iosplanner/Planner-tool/iosplanner.cgi?release_name=12.2.33-SXImajorRel=12.2state=:RLtype=Early%20Deployment
It looks like there is support for multi-AF (v4/v6) VRFs. Is it real or
just a
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Gabby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to do packet capture or the like on a 6509 (or similar
platform) that doesn't have a FW module. I know I could do span port, but I'm
interested in knowing if there's any other method
It looks like a new
I haven't looked at the price list.
How does an ASR1002 compare to a G2 combo?
From a growth perspective the ASR1002 would be what I would
consider giving a potential migration to GigE.
Rodney
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:52:47PM +0800, raymondh (NSP) wrote:
You may want to consider getting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rodney Dunn) wrote:
I haven't looked at the price list.
How does an ASR1002 compare to a G2 combo?
In real-life prices in Germany the ASR1002/AdvEntSvc is some EUR 3K-5K
more expensive than a 7201/AdvIPSvc. No idea about a real combo.
Elmar.
Hi,
I have a strange behavior on my mac-address table count. we are running L2
wimax network using Cisco 3750ME switches distributed on 60 sites and
aggregated on 2 Cisco 7600 routers. the mac address table should be the same
for all switches, since we are using the same traffic VLAN for all
When we developed the Embedded Packet Capture for IOS there was a project
in the works to do something similar for CAT6k to make elam type
captures easier.
Seems it shipped with SXI per this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/configuration/guide/mpa.html
and
http://tools.cisco.com/search/display?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cisco.com%2Fen%2FUS%2Fprod%2Fcollateral%2Fiosswrel%2Fps8802%2Fps6970%2Fps6017%2Fps9673%2Fproduct_bulletin_c25-503086.htmlpos=1strqueryid=1websessionid=m7dr3yFygHTz5Rv3D5SKdLV
The DHCPv6 Relay component is enhanced to support a stateless
Mark Tinka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the only reason folk wouldn't look at the ASR9000
for Metro-E P/PE deployments, at least in the short to
medium term, is because IOS XR might be anaemic when
compared to regular IOS.
Isn't the 7600 likely to be cheaper than the ASR9000 for the
Well, that's not the most elegant one but here you go...
If you configure vrf-aware NAT to policy NAT your CE addresses so that
they are translated into a new address space for that specific source
and on the PE route this new translation range out of the link you like
it should work.
Making the same file for release notes of SXH and SXI makes /me think
that SXH4 won't see the light... what do people have heard about it ?
About SXI, does it look deployable or SXI3 or SXI4 is the version to look for ?
(may be too soon to tell, I know)
One thing we noticed about promised
On Nov 13, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
About SXI, does it look deployable or SXI3 or SXI4 is the version to
look for ?
I encourage my competitors to deploy SXI. Now. ;-)
Really though, I couldn't imagine touching this stuff before
safe-harbor does or at least waiting for
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:47:32AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
It also appears that they now have ssh+ipv6 back in regular ipservices
and you can get the lan only image too for those, meaning lots of flash
savings.
Is there a reasonable IPv6 - IOS image package feature matrix
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:14:23PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:47:32AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
It also appears that they now have ssh+ipv6 back in regular ipservices
and you can get the lan only image too for those, meaning lots of flash
savings.
Is
Hello All:
Has anyone ever gotten trunking working between a 3560 and Dell 6248 or
similar? The Dell seems only to support GVRP in comparison to Cisco's VTP.
Since the 3560 doesn't support GVRP I think I'm out of luck, but I'm hoping
someone here has figured out a kludge to get this working.
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 01:44:43PM -0200, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
Making the same file for release notes of SXH and SXI makes /me think
that SXH4 won't see the light... what do people have heard about it ?
About SXI, does it look deployable or SXI3 or SXI4 is the version to
This isn't SP related so please forgive the noise.
RANCID tipped me off just now that one of my APs had been rebooted. I
logged in and found a cryptic error:
System returned to ROM by unknown reload cause - reason ptr 0xF, PC
0x4F6768, address 0x0
The code I'm running is
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 01:44:43PM -0200, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
Making the same file for release notes of SXH and SXI makes /me think
that SXH4 won't see the light... what do people have heard about it
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:43:23PM -0500, Tim Durack wrote:
I wonder if people are interested in coordinating their testing and pooling
results?
Sounds like a good idea. I have four chassis running SXI modular, waiting to
go into production next week. OSPF/BGP/MPLS/HSRP
Phil Mayers wrote:
Hroi Sigurdsson wrote:
Jared Mauch wrote:
It appears cisco released SXI already.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/Iosplanner/Planner-tool/iosplanner.cgi?release_name=12.2.33-SXImajorRel=12.2state=:RLtype=Early%20Deployment
It looks like there is support for
If I didn't remember wrongly based on the list price, it's still
cheaper to get the G2 combo either on the 7201 or 7206 w/ the bundle
and the difference in cost is quite significant for some.
Unless Magnus sees that there's a need for the central forwarding
engine/esp or he sees that
At 12:46 PM 13-11-08 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
If people want to, I can set up a wiki where you can post
test cases, results, configurations, feature data, etc..
Would that be of value?
I can't wait for the black T-shirt:
I have SXI - do you?
-Hank
- Jared
--
I'm looking for some pointers on what are the smallest recommeded
Cisco
boxes to use for a small multihoming solution.
2 full BGP views (approx 260k routes each)
100 Mbps bandwidth requirement.
The setup currently uses 2 Juniper M5 but those are in dire need of
refresh.
What is the
The tunnel option could work the problem is the SOURCE is behind a
Juniper netscreen and I don't think they support gre tunnel
termination..
Also I don't want this active all the time, I want it to switch
dynamically.
Maybe there is something else that would accomplish what I am trying to
do.
I
All -
I've got two 3750's acting in an HSRP failover environment for some
critical services.
HSRP is running on a vlan interface.
We have a number of appliances that are dual-homed across the switches,
living on the particular VLAN.
We've been experiencing an issue with one of our appliances,
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
But if you really need 100Mb/sec then a 3845 which can handle
256Mb/sec of thruput would be the next one that can handle 1GB.
Actually, 3825 would be the next one ... rated at ~170Mb/sec ... 3825
are nice, too with their dual GigE onboard ... we use a couple of them
for
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Magnus Eriksson wrote:
The setup currently uses 2 Juniper M5 but those are in dire need of refresh.
i realize this is a cisco list, but the reason i make this suggestion
is that it'd be easier to copy your configuration to what's already junos
than port
Hello Leif:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leif Sawyer
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11:34 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] 3750 HSRP question
All -
I've got two 3750's acting in an HSRP failover environment
I can't wait for the black T-shirt:
I have SXI - do you?
I'm SXI - are you?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Michael K. Smith writes:
HSRP uses multicast address 224.0.0.2 so you could filter out
that IP on the appliance-facing ports.
if that was an option, we'd be doing that. :-(
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
If blocking egress multicast doesn't cause any issues in your appliances, you could give
switchport block multicast a try on their ports.
--
Tassos
Leif Sawyer wrote on 13/11/2008 21:34:
All -
I've got two 3750's acting in an HSRP failover environment for some
critical services.
HSRP is
Hi List,
we've got two 4507R-E with redundant Supervisor Engine 6-E.
To connect these two switches, we're using a X2 Module on each Supervisor
Engine. On both switches the Interfaces Te3/1 and Te4/1 are configured as
Port-Channel.
Config on both Switches:
interface Te3/1
description Link1
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou writes:
If blocking egress multicast doesn't cause any issues in your
appliances, you could give switchport block multicast a try
on their ports.
unfortunately, this command only blocks unknown m/c addresses.
HSRP uses a well-known address, and is not subject to
Anyone know where I can GEIP, GEIP+ or PA-GE cards cheap? I'm running a
7505 at home, and I'm not made of money. 8-)
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Gabby wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to do packet capture or the like on a 6509 (or similar platform)
that doesn't have a FW module. I know I could do span port, but I'm interested
in knowing if there's any other method
on Nexus 7000, you can do packet-capture of data-plane traffic
What about the following?
mac address-table static 0100.5e00.0002 vlan X int A B ...
Just don't include the 2 appliance interfaces into the interface list (or include only the
2 hsrp ports).
--
Tassos
Leif Sawyer wrote on 14/11/2008 00:18:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou writes:
If blocking egress
We are currently looking to deploy a number of metro rings (mostly layer 2)
with a requirement for basic QOS and rate limiting in 1Mbps increments. The
ME3400 looks ideal if only it had decent granularity for policing / shaping.
The Metro 3750 and 4900's (for dual 10Gbps uplinks) look more
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou writes:
What about the following?
mac address-table static 0100.5e00.0002 vlan X int A B ...
Just don't include the 2 appliance interfaces into the
interface list (or include only the 2 hsrp ports).
Nope. That doesn't seem to do anything -- I'm still seeing
Tried Ebay?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sridhar Ayengar
Sent: Thursday, 13 November, 2008 22:35
To: Cisco NSPs
Subject: [c-nsp] GEIP or PA-GE
Anyone know where I can GEIP, GEIP+ or PA-GE cards cheap?
I'm running a
I was wondering why there are local IP address in my BGP table?
* 192.100.146.0207.162.208.221 0 0 26689 3356
i
I am trying to figure out the best way to utilize multihomed routing
between our two DS3 providors. I am new to the NSP world and trying to
get a
Thanks, so was the SUP module or the GE module that was faulty?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Nitzan Tzelniker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see this issue in the past on sup720 it was probably faulty module (we
replace some of them and the spikes stop )
Nitzan
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Anyone know where I can GEIP, GEIP+ or PA-GE cards cheap? I'm running a 7505
at home, and I'm not made of money. 8-)
That would depend on how you define cheap :)
Your best bet would probably be to check with one of the many places that
deal in
We are currently looking to deploy a number of metro rings (mostly
layer 2) with a requirement for basic QOS and rate limiting in 1Mbps
increments. The ME3400 looks ideal if only it had decent granularity
for policing / shaping.
We have looked at the ME3400 for a similar role. Our biggest
Yes it would be nice if you could control where the HSRP advertisements
are sent out. Something similar to the passive-interface command with
EIGRP would be nice.
Let me know if you work this one out. I don't like the idea of HSRP
spamming our Ethernet VLAN's either.
Aaron Riemer
-Original
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 23:06 +0100, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
If a remove one Supervisor Engine in the first 4507, the Port-Channel
only contains interface Te4/1.
If I put the removed Engine back, Interface Te3/1 comes back without
any configuration.
As a result, all vlans are send over
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 11:50 -0500, Drew Weaver wrote:
GWIP was substituted for the ip of the 'gateway' or other end of that
interface.
Sorry, of course the IP would be in the route. I was just
'obfusticating the output' for the list, as they say ;-)
That explains a lot. Overlooked that one.
Has anyone ever gotten trunking working between a
3560 and Dell 6248 or similar? The Dell seems only
to support GVRP in comparison to Cisco's VTP.
Since the 3560 doesn't support GVRP I think I'm out
of luck, but I'm hoping someone here has figured out
a kludge to get this working.
I've
You'll have to beat all the girls off with your linecards with a t-shirt
that cool!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher
Sent: Friday, 14 November 2008 5:34 AM
To: Jared Mauch; Tim Durack
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Jared
Martin Moens wrote:
Tried Ebay?
Yup. Very expensive. More than some dealer prices.
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
It's not local block.. actually it's public ip address block belong to
US Dept. of Agriculture.
OrgName:U.S. Dept. of Agriculture - ARS
OrgID: UDAA-2
Address:Agricultural Research Service
Address:Plant Sciences Institute
Address:Alternate Crops and Systems Laboratory
IMHO, since we are now running both of Juniper Cisco, for handling
huge of traffic (e.g Flooding) M5 still much better compared to 7206 VXR
a. r. isnaini rangkayo sutan
Rodney Dunn wrote:
I haven't looked at the price list.
How does an ASR1002 compare to a G2 combo?
From a growth
On Friday 14 November 2008 11:36:41 a. rahman isnaini
r.sutan wrote:
IMHO, since we are now running both of Juniper Cisco,
for handling huge of traffic (e.g Flooding) M5 still much
better compared to 7206 VXR
To be fair, it's a different architecture - so an
apple-to-apple comparison
If you look at the interactive model (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/ps5857/prod_presentation0900aecd80543db9.html)
you can see GE0/0 and GE0/1 interfaces.
In addition, the data sheet for both the 3825 and 3845 indicates 2
10/100/1000 interfaces:
On Friday 14 November 2008 13:09:58 Eric Cables wrote:
If you look at the interactive model (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855
/ps5857/prod_presentation0900aecd80543db9.html) you can
see GE0/0 and GE0/1 interfaces.
In addition, the data sheet for both the 3825 and
And to repeat - to the best of my knowledge the 3825 can't take 1GB of RAM
and therefore is not an optimal solution for small multihoming. -Hank
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2008 13:09:58 Eric Cables wrote:
If you look at the interactive model (
Peter Rathlev schrieb:
Maybe running LACP on the link (channel-group 1 mode active) could
help avoid the err-disable part. As far as I understand, you would end
up with a one-member port-channel on each side, and then a standalone
I port (independent) on the unchanged side facing a regular
Hi all,
I use a 3825 for PPPoE termination, with local authententication, how
can I log user session on the router's log?
Kind regards.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
75 matches
Mail list logo
