I've used it on a daily-basis with 10.5.5 and previous releases for a long
time and have never had it crash the machine.
BR,
Sibbi
On 3.12.2008 05:57, Mark Tinka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably a little off-topic for this list, but wondering if
anyone else is registering random but
Hi all!
I have a problem with my cisco 851w device.
When i try to connect to the wifi (eith correct key), this comes to the
consol:
*Mar 1 2002 11:18:16.047 CET: *** Not encrypted dot1x packet from
00c0.a8aa.3955 has been discarded
*Mar 1 2002 11:18:16.051 CET: *** Not encrypted dot1x
Thanks for helping me brush up on basic networking! :)
Under what circumstances would directed broadcast actually be a useful
feature?
- Original Message -
From: Mark Boolootian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:32 PM
Subject: Re:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Adam Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for helping me brush up on basic networking! :)
Under what circumstances would directed broadcast actually be a useful
feature?
Wake-on-LAN. That's the only reason we permit directed-broadcasts.
Tim:
1. Thanks for the awesome explanations. I've been dealing with these
terms for a while, but had not really grasped them too hard until now.
(To be honest, I had not looked them up in a while either.)
2. When would a directed broadcast be useful? Not only for WOL, but
for some disk
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:13:38AM -0800, Mike Leber wrote:
Once you have IPv6 connectivity established (either native IPv6 or via a
tunnel from anybody) if you want a self teaching procedural guide where
you can setup and test various IPv6 services (HTTP, SMTP, reverse DNS,
forward DNS,
We're having some really odd issues with a pair of 6500's. We know that
our TCAM table is overflowed, but it's worked fine up until now (new pair
of SUP720-10GE's on order, but not here yet, of course.)
Here's the TCAM errors we are getting, which are pretty typical:
Dec 3 10:29:18:
Do you have a reason you can't do a partial BGP feed with a default
route between the 7200s and the 6500s to lower the table size?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Carlson
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:26 AM
To:
Negative. I've used several versions on Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5
without issue. I've only used it on a MacBook Pro.
Regards,
Ryan
On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:57 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
Probably a little off-topic for this list, but wondering if
anyone else is registering random but frequent
Nate Carlson wrote:
We're having some really odd issues with a pair of 6500's. We know
that
our TCAM table is overflowed, but it's worked fine up until now (new
pair
of SUP720-10GE's on order, but not here yet, of course.)
Here's the TCAM errors we are getting, which are pretty typical:
I'm trying to troubleshoot an issue on a 6500/SUP2 and i have noticed that when mirroring a specific port, i'm getting
less traffic that is actually going out. The source is sending continuously at the same rate and the problem is
happening all the time.
6500#sh int gi3/24 | i ut rate
30
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Nate Carlson wrote:
We're debating that.. I'm not the guy who designed this, but that's the
long-term goal. ;)
Right now, we're filtering /24's to get by temporarily (with default routes
to cover), which after doing a 'clear ip route' on the Cat's, gave us:
I assume
Works great for me on OS X 10.5.5... also on a MBP. No stability problems at
all. Now if I could get the VPN client to add the domain suffix to my search
order each time I connect, it would be perfect. Has anyone seen that work on OS
X?
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Thursday 04 December 2008 07:06:13 Vinny Abello wrote:
Works great for me on OS X 10.5.5... also on a MBP. No
stability problems at all.
Each time my laptop freezes up (and needs a hard reset), the
bug report indicates Cisco VPN Client had something to do
with it.
It only seems to happen
My laptop never freezes and I'll be connected with the VPN client the entire
day sometimes. I'm running 4.9.01(0100) with OS X 10.5.5. I've used previous
versions with OS X 10.4.10 and 10.4.11 along with 10.5 through 10.5.5 and never
experienced any lockups with the Cisco VPN client. Do you
DOM is supported with appropriate SFP models (ie,
those that are DOM capable, such as SFP-GE-S, -L, -Z).
Tim
At 08:21 AM 12/2/2008, Marian ÄurkoviÄ murmered:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 02:53:41PM -0300, Juan Angel Menendez wrote:
It's already here: N7K-M148GS-11 Nexus
7000 Series
I've also seen directed broadcast needed for remote management of some thin
client platforms across subnets.
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Gauthier
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:55 AM
To:
Hi guys,
I've finally solved out the mystery with that /29 subnet being blocked
after the iBGP relationship came up.
It was because of the ip verify unicast reverse-path option enabled on
Router1 on the interfaces connecting the router to the ISPA.
I had this option enabled to prevent ip
18 matches
Mail list logo
