We just tackled this one in our organisation.
2 Gotchas.
1. Router-id must be different between peers, make sure your code supports
vrf specific router-id.
2. iBGP was very messy IMHO, so we went with eBGP using local-as to have
each vrf appear to be a different 65xxx AS
I can sent you my lab
Saku Ytti wrote on Thursday, December 18, 2008 08:37:
On (2008-12-16 13:37 -0800), bill fumerola wrote:
Hey Bill,
why does adding an external community to a route (via a route-map)
impact the neighbor itself? i realize in later versions of IOS this
command was added to the
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tuc at T-B-O-H
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 3:54 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Any good filters for syslog output
Hi,
We are going
We use a combo of syslog-ng+swatch for our filtering which can do
quite a lot for free, any more tips on what messages people are
looking for on Cisco networks would be appreciated.
Cheers,
W
2008/12/18 Eric Van Tol e...@atlantech.net:
-Original Message-
From:
Hi @All,
what information I got regarding AS32 is somewhat worrysome:
12.0(32)S12 Q4/2008
for 72 GSR
12.4(24)T Q1/2009
ISR's, 72, 73
12.2SRE Q3-Q4/2009
for 72 76
12.2SXI unspecified late 2009
for 65
12.2SB no longer
12.2SXI for the 6500 is already available. So i suppose it is the first IOS
that supports this feature.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:51:26PM -, Antonio Soares wrote:
12.2SXI for the 6500 is already available. So i suppose it is the first IOS
that supports this feature.
It doesn't. Maybe planned for a later rebuild of SXI.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 14:58 +0800, Jack wrote:
anyone who has experienced or encountered this ?
HSRP configuration has no problem and root bridge as well.
but this logs only happened in Sw1. whereby sw2 has no suspicious
error symptom found.
Dec 12 15:40:24.556 CCT:
Hi,
I just checked the info I have - 2nd source says SXJ ... so supposedly that
one with a time frame was a typo and meant to be SXJ.
regards,
Marcus
Systemtechnik Internet / Internet Engineering
Have you done a write mem or any configuration change just prior to this?
Do you have any throttles on this interface?
--- On Thu, 18/12/08, Teller, Robert rtel...@deltadentalwa.com wrote:
From: Teller, Robert rtel...@deltadentalwa.com
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] STP or HSRP problem ?
To: Jack
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 06:43:46AM -0800, Teller, Robert wrote:
This appears to be related to hsrp. What is the exact problem your
having, do your users report loss of connectivity momentarily or are you
just looking in your log file and see this entry. It's hard to say
without see your config
Hi,
* Eric Cables ecab...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been using swatch for a couple of years now, and have been pretty happy
with it (I used CiscoWorks' built-in syslog analyzer before, yuck!). I have
had ambitions to test out SEC (Simple Event Correlator), which appears to
still be developed (not
Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately it didn't have an impact on the
CPU utilization.
I received this suggestion as well:
If you run AES instead you'll massively reduce your CPU utilization.
I'd suggest a G1 at least for what you're doing. An 1811 would probably
run better than this
Eric Van Tol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tuc at T-B-O-H
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 3:54 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Any good filters for syslog output
Hi,
The other nice thing about SEC is that it can handle a busy log server
without nuking the cpu. You can get pretty crazy with it too in terms
of complexity.
Christian Zeng wrote:
Hi,
* Eric Cables ecab...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been using swatch for a couple of years now, and have been
On 2008-12-18 17:59, Spencer Barnes wrote:
It helped reduce utilization on the VPN process by about 20% but I'm
still seeing high CPU utilization when uploading from our network and
I should have mentioned that the border router with the high CPU
utilization is connected to another Cisco 7206
Hey guys,
I have this 1751 router that I am having issues with. For some reason
when I do a 'show version' it doesn't list the flash memory and when I
do a dir flash: the directory doesn't exist! However when going into
rommon mode a dir flash: shows the flash fine but doesn't indicate the
size
http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows/2008/121808-cisco-quiz.html?netht=rn_121808nladname=121808
-Hank
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I have had a few requests for this so I thought i'd put it on-list.
Thanks,
Aaron Daniels
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Daniels - Lists
Sent: Thursday, 18 December 2008 6:13 PM
To: 'Tim
On 2008-12-19 06:32, Tony wrote:
If I FTP a file from PC2 to PC1 I get speeds of 97Mbps (near enough
to wire speed of 100Mbps). Nice. I then change the config so that the
interfaces are in a VRF, like this: Testing using the FTP transfer
again I get an average transfer speed of around 14Mbps
20 matches
Mail list logo
