Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:04:40AM -0400, Jeff Cartier wrote:
Just for peace of mind, and a good nights sleep :-)...I was hoping for
some confirmation from the group if this is the correct way to upgrade
the IOS (the boss is against patching the IOS). So here are my steps...
How does
Hi Gert,
We looked into modular some time ago, but I don't imagine much has changed.
Patches were for as you say gaping security holes, not upgrades even of a point
release.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Hello ,
I am using CNR as a DNS , DHCP and TFTP server. I am planning to use DHCP ,
DNS and TFTP failover. I am thinking that , the CNR doesn't support failover
functionality for TFTP service. I can not configure multiple TFTP addresses
in the CNR's DHCP policies menu. But , i think i have found
Hello,
I haven't been able to find the command for clearing platform
hardware capacity fabric / forwarding counters.
Or isn't it possible? and should I reboot?
Kind regards,
Bas
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I have a 6509 (with Sup720-3B) that contains 2 x WS-X6704-10GE blades
where I am trying to set the MTU to be 1504 on each of these
interfaces. On one blade it will only allow me to set the MTU to 9216
if the interface is a switchport, the 1504 MTU size only becomes an
option when it is
Michael,
Check:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12
.2SX/configuration/guide/intrface.html#wp104
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/ios/interface/command/reference/
ir_l2.html#wp1030775
Hi Bill,
Often this is symptom that one or more NMS tools are freely walking
through the MIBs. Also, if you are running a recent 12.2SR train
image (not a recent SRD), you might be hitting the CSCsv80014 bug.
Btw, which IOS version are you running?
A good (not specific to the 7600 platform)
For a 7200 with FE ports this translates into:
mpls mtu 1546
But not PA-(2)FE-TX(-ISL) or IO-(2)FE because they have an inbuilt 1530B
on the wire limitation
Please see discussion regarding this from ~1 year back.
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Hi,
-Mensagem original-
De: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Em nome de Randy Densen
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 23 de julho de 2009 17:58
Para: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Assunto: [c-nsp] vrf-lite vs. MPLS vrf
This is my first post.
I
It is likely that you have configured an SVI or a VLAN on the 6509 for
9216 already.
If any VLAN that crosses the switchport is 9216, then you can't adjust
the MTU of the port to a value below 9216.
Do a 'show vlan' and also check all the SVI's for an MTU higher than
1504, then either
You hit on the issue. I had a NMS client polling the route table. This box has
two full feeds and 12 other bilateral peers. Apparently, the cat7.6k/rsp720
doesn't do well in this scenario. I would imagine the GSR's or perhaps even the
shiny new ASR's implement this in hardware, but I am
Hello Bill,
How large is the ARP table? sho ip arp summ If it is around 15k
then the issue is the ARP or BRIDGE table conversion that the route
processor must do to go from hashed format to lexigraphical format
which SNMP queries require.SNMP queries the RIP table for these
Once you define the L2 MTU, packets on that VLAN can traverse any
ports on that VLAN up to that MTU, but if you need to route them and
retain the L2 MTU then the L3 SVI must have the same MTU. You can
have the SVI different, say 1500, as long as you understand that the
packets will be
The packet loss was caused poor link quality.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Burkholder [mailto:r...@oneunified.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:33 PM
To: Tony Baade; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OSPF question
We experienced an issue on our network where we have
Does anyone know if it's available in another IGP?
Or does anyone have any sample scripts I might able to try out?
Anthony J Baade
Network Engineer
Business Only Broadband, LLC
O (630) 590-6011
C (630) 340-0696
t...@bobbroadband.com
www.bobbroadband.com
-Original Message-
From:
That does look like it would work for me. Thanks for all the input.
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Pepelnjak [mailto:i...@ioshints.info]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:50 AM
To: 'Ruben Alvarez'; 'Mateusz Blaszczyk'
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OSPF NSSA
It's actually quite simple: you need an EEM applet that triggers on X
occurences of a well-known SYSLOG message (OSPF neighbor going down) within
Y seconds, modifies the configuration (to insert passive-interface X into
the router ospf Y) and alerts the operators via an e-mail.
You'll find a few
Hello,
I remember cisco boxes having CPU problems with retrieving arp / route
table entries via SNMP more than ten years ago. Maybe someone must create
some kind of snmp proxy that retrieves those tables from cli
Regards,
John
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
Hello Bill,
On Jul 20, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
If your 3825 router is having a hard time taking care of the load, I
would recommend you look at a 7201 (or at an older 7301).
I appreciate the responses from all. I am testing Poptop, but am
having some interoperability issues
Does anyone know if Circuit emulation using NM-CEM-4TE1 cards supports the
xconnects inside a VRF?
Scott
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from
Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended
only for the named recipient(s). If you have received
Hello Bas,
Have you tried clear fab peak ?
Abidin
On 24 Jul 2009, at 10:15, bas wrote:
Hello,
I haven't been able to find the command for clearing platform
hardware capacity fabric / forwarding counters.
Or isn't it possible? and should I reboot?
Kind regards,
Bas
Greetings!
I have a question if it is possible to initiate L2TP client (not true
LAC in fact, see config below) to use other VRF than global for L2TP
encapsulated packets?
I have this lab scenario: LNS (Cisco 1721,
c1700-advsecurityk9-mz.124-12.bin)
vpdn enable
!
vpdn-group 1
Those are still pretty long timeouts. Can you reduce those, a minute
for ICMP should be plenty. 2 minutes should be good for the other two.
Machines infected with stuff could certainly be opening sessions that
could be killed off quickly.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From:
This is for an enterprise disaster-recovery scenario. The configuration is
simplistic -- http://scotthughes.org/cem-failover
To clarify, I'm talking about Circuit Emulation on ISR routers. I want to
emulate analog circuits using a SONET-protected Ethernet VLAN as IP backhaul.
The ISR routers
Hi Scott,
To some degree, this would be rather odd to do as CES is a point-to-point
solution and is used to transport TDM traffic.
Please clarify why you would do this?
__
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
Lars Lystrup Christensen
Director of Engineering,
Hello Abidin,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Abidin
Kahramanabidin.kahra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Bas,
Have you tried clear fab peak ?
Thank you, that did the trick.
I dont know how I missed that.
Do you also know how to clear the peak-pps counters in :
show platform hardware capacity
26 matches
Mail list logo
