Re: [c-nsp] best ios version for VSS

2010-01-28 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:02:25AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: But meanwhile, I'll keep buying more of these boxes :-). Cisco must really hate this box. All their attempts to drive customers away (BU split, shoddy support for modular IOS, confusing platform strategy) are *still* not working

Re: [c-nsp] 4900M vs. 4503 for core

2010-01-28 Thread Geoffrey Pendery
Thirded. We recently built out a large deployment, with a mix of hardware ordered, and the 4900Ms were the last thing to arrive, many months late. The 4500's with Sup 6E were also significantly delayed due to short supply (and indeed, I believe the 4900M really is a 4500 Sup6E, just in a fixed

Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 86, Issue 90

2010-01-28 Thread Jeff Bacon
From: Geoffrey Pendery ge...@pendery.net Thirded. We recently built out a large deployment, with a mix of hardware ordered, and the 4900Ms were the last thing to arrive, many months late. The 4500's with Sup 6E were also significantly delayed due to short supply (and indeed, I believe the

Re: [c-nsp] Vlans and PIX firewal

2010-01-28 Thread Steven Pfister
I've got a diagram together that I probably should have included with my original post, and hopefully I've got everything on there that I need to... http://www.pfisterfarm.com/vlan_and_pix_post.jpg The ports on the 4507R going to the pix are both access ports in the appropriate vlan. All

Re: [c-nsp] Self rebooting pix?

2010-01-28 Thread Jason Gurtz
We had this issue on a 525 and opened a TAC case. We provided Cisco with sh tech (I think) and the root cause was a code issue (ver. 6.x) concerning the number of connections. Never called the TAC here but that sounds about right. At the time we experienced this we were adding PAT mappings as

[c-nsp] Alun Mcglinchey is out of the office.

2010-01-28 Thread Alun Mcglinchey
I will be out of the office starting 28/01/2010 and will not return until 01/02/2010. I will respond to your message when I return, if your query is urgent please contact the IT servicedesk team on 6634 or email Cameron McKinnon (cmckin...@wiseman-dairies.co.uk)

[c-nsp] port-channel help (warning, might be dumb)

2010-01-28 Thread Randy McAnally
I'm trying to configure a LACP port-channel between Cisco 6509 and Foundry FESX. Cisco config: interface Port-channel1 switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 2,28 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet1/5 switchport

[c-nsp] Traceroute parser/visualizer

2010-01-28 Thread tkacprzynski
Hi, I'm looking for some tool/script that takes in traceroute output generated by Cisco devices and graphs it. Has anyone heard of anything like that? Thank you, Tom ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] Nexus 2000 vs Catalyst 4948 for access layer

2010-01-28 Thread Livio Zanol Puppim
Hi folks, Can anyone please tell me the advantages of using Nexus 2000 over Catalyst 4948 as access layers switches? Using Nexus 2000, I have to use at least 2 ports at my Nexus 5000, that could be used by servers with 10GbE/FCoE servers. Also, are there any advantages on NX-OS compared to IOS?

Re: [c-nsp] Traceroute parser/visualizer

2010-01-28 Thread Mohammad Khalil
try pingplotter Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:04:15 -0600 From: tkacprzyn...@spencerstuart.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Traceroute parser/visualizer Hi, I'm looking for some tool/script that takes in traceroute output generated by Cisco devices and graphs it. Has

Re: [c-nsp] Traceroute parser/visualizer

2010-01-28 Thread tkacprzynski
Thank you for you response. I'm actually looking for something that will take in text files of traceroutes generated on cisco routers and visualize them instead a program that generates them. Thanks Tom From: Mohammad Khalil [mailto:eng_m...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 28,

Re: [c-nsp] port-channel help (warning, might be dumb)

2010-01-28 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, Foundry config: trunk ethe 1 to 2 trunk deploy foundry does LACP... did you do link-aggregate active on the foundry? alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] [SUMMARY]: 4900M vs. 4503 for core

2010-01-28 Thread Adam Atkinson
Mark Tinka wrote: We've been down this road before when searching for a 1U Ethernet switch that provides decent fibre-only port density. Extreme X650? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] [SUMMARY]: 4900M vs. 4503 for core

2010-01-28 Thread Andrew Gabriel
For pure L2 aggregation HP also has a 24-port fiber switch that is very reasonably priced. It also has 10 G uplinks that you can use to connect to a 4948 10G switch, which will work out to be fairly cost effective. Regards, Andrew Gabriel. On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Adam Atkinson

[c-nsp] Policer on c4503

2010-01-28 Thread Mikisa Richard
Hi all, Any ideas why the Policer policy below does not work. Intention is for me to lock down traffic to 3Mbps both ways on interface g3/11. !! class-map match-all ROKE-LIMIT match access-group name ROKE-SLAP ! policy-map POLICY-ROKE class ROKE-LIMIT police 300 bps 3 byte