Dear Team,
What wiil be the Optimal MTU Rate for wireless Tunnel Network ??
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Dear all,
I've encountered a strange behavior of nfdump when running it with the -s
and -t options. Sometimes it works as expected, sometimes it gives me
strange values in Time window:, e.g.
Time window: 2010-01-01 00:00:22 - 2010-03-13 04:34:32
when running with
-t
Good day,
the 3GE-GBIC-SC card does IPv6 in software on the linecard. Is anyone
aware of a problem that IPv6 traffic that is software-forwarded
could influence IPv4 hardware forwarding? It looks like a linecard
could hit 100% with ~80 Mbit/s of v6 traffic + other tasks
like TAG Stats Backgr or
Hi,
from what they tell you, I suspect that they sugest that you should
statically route ip adresses of one group of clients (that's the reason
why static ip adresses - you need to define them).
The feature you are looking for should be acompished with policy based
routing, but this is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jens,
I will look into that.
- Peter
Dear all,
I've encountered a strange behavior of nfdump when running it with the -s
and -t options. Sometimes it works as expected, sometimes it gives me
strange values in Time window:, e.g.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:44:24PM +0530, vijay gore wrote:
What wiil be the Optimal MTU Rate for wireless Tunnel Network ??
417.3 MTU per second.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert
Hi,
We are investigating options to provide a VLAN-per-customer within a
hosting environment. Inside each VLAN could be hosting services, e.g.
hosted web servers, AD, Exchange (etc). In order to maximum the number
of supported VLANs, then the use of Private VLANs has been raised.
However,
Hi Sascha,
the 3GE-GBIC-SC card does IPv6 in software on the linecard. Is anyone
aware of a problem that IPv6 traffic that is software-forwarded
could influence IPv4 hardware forwarding? It looks like a linecard
could hit 100% with ~80 Mbit/s of v6 traffic + other tasks
like TAG Stats Backgr
Matt,
We looked at doing this ourselves a few years back. We decided to push L2
responsibility down to the customer rack and do all L3 at the distribution
layer. We use the venerable WS-C3550-48-EMI switches for this duty, and they
have been rock solid for years. We did have a few
On Feb 26, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Sascha Pollok wrote:
If so, I might
go to for 4GE-SFP-LC or similar which does v6 in hardware AFAIK.
You should be running E3 or E5 linecards at your edges, as these are required
to support NetFlow, uRPF, and ACLs.
Hi
actually, i have a small labs:
1 Cisco 6506/Sup720
2 Cisco 7301
1 Cisco 7204
All are connected to the 6500 with IPv4, ISIS and MPLS (MP BGP)
The first Cisco 7301 are connected to a ISP A and the Second connected
to the ISP B
in classic IPv4 Bgp.
I want add IPv6 on this network. My
On 25/02/2010 10:36, Muhammad Atif Jauahar wrote:
We are going to upgrade our Data Center we need 2 (redundant) core
switches with top of rack switches (Edge).
We get two Proposals
1. 2 x EX8216 Switches (Core) and few EX4200 Switches (Edge)
2. 2 x Nexus
On 2010.02.26 08:51, Stephane MAGAND wrote:
Hi
actually, i have a small labs:
1 Cisco 6506/Sup720
2 Cisco 7301
1 Cisco 7204
All are connected to the 6500 with IPv4, ISIS and MPLS (MP BGP)
The first Cisco 7301 are connected to a ISP A and the Second connected
to the ISP B
in
Hey Roland,
You mean if the provider can figure out where the traffic is coming from right?
Haven't had too much luck with that so far.
thanks,
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dobbins, Roland
You're of course right, because if it didn't I never would've known this was
happening =)
The problem now is getting my upstream to figure out what the source is =(
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:37 PM
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/25/2010 7:28 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
Because that's how NetFlow is supposed to work on a real router, vs.
the broken implementation on 6500/7600 with current hardware.
I am running Netflow v5 on a 7600 with 12.2(33)SRC5 and I see packets
Hello,
I've got a pair of 7200VXRs w/ NPE400s doing bba for 3 ATM DS3s as
well as T-1 aggregation and a server farm. I was looking at my options
for upgrading and consolidating these boxes and I think it would either
be an 7200VXR-G1 (G2?) or an ASR1002. These two options seem to carry
On Friday 26 February 2010 10:57:41 pm Philip Davis wrote:
I've got a pair of 7200VXRs w/ NPE400s doing bba for
3 ATM DS3s as well as T-1 aggregation and a server farm.
I was looking at my options for upgrading and
consolidating these boxes and I think it would either be
an
We used to use (at a previous job) 3550's, private VLAN's, and
local-proxy-arp to achieve this. It would occasionally irritate customers
because our 3550 would win the ARP response for traffic going between their
hosts, though this usually wasn't an issue since we'd happily push those
few
Hi everyone,
Figure this is as good a place as any to reach out and see if anyone has
some experience with this.
I'm currently debating whether I use LDAP or a Remote Agent for Windows with
my SecureACS Appliance to authenticate network users via AD. I've read
through the documentation a bit,
Hello,
I've got a pair of 7200VXRs w/ NPE400s doing bba for 3 ATM DS3s as
well as T-1 aggregation and a server farm. I was looking at my options
for upgrading and consolidating these boxes and I think it would either
be an 7200VXR-G1 (G2?) or an ASR1002. These two options seem to carry
Yes Ryan, you can restrict access based on LDAP or AD groups to
specific groups of devices and access levels, however, I would
STRONGLY recommend the direct LDAP approach, using LDAPS with
certificates, as opposed to the AD plugin, which has been rife with
memory leaks and other stability
Personally i'd go for freeradius or radiator RADIUS server for the backend
policy/logic - both work well with AD and handle many EAP types . Proxying etc
--- original message ---
From: Ryan Lambert thirdfrl@gmail.com
Subject: [c-nsp] SecureACS Appliance AD Authentication
Date: 26th
Hi,
Just a note on this one. Within our organisation we have a number of
systems, freeradius etc so we decided to consolidate and use Microsoft's
Network Policy Server with RADIUS to authenticate against Active Directory.
It's all built in to 2008. You can set certain users, or groups to have
I have some CF 1 GB modules that are recognized on insert:
Feb 25 10:45:11.034 PST: %FILESYS-SP-5-DEV: PCMCIA flash card inserted into
disk0
But won't format:
xxx#format disk0:
Format operation may take a while. Continue? [confirm]y
Format operation will destroy all data in disk0:.
Peter
Unfortunately you can't just use any flash card in the 6500/7600.
Theoretically all that is required is a standard ATA CF but I have
found that not all work.
You can find more info on the CF card like so show disk0: filesys
I have only had good experiences with:
ATA CARD GEOMETRY
Unfortunately you can't just use any flash card in the 6500/7600.
Theoretically all that is required is a standard ATA CF but I have
found that not all work.
You can find more info on the CF card like so show disk0: filesys
I have only had good experiences with:
ATA CARD GEOMETRY
Hello Jan,
thanks for your reply. It sheds some light on that annoying
problem.
forwarding IPv4 traffic or AT LEAST stops responding to ICMP Echo
(directed to the interface IP) or loses IP protocols like
LDP or OSPF which could point to problems GRP/PRP - Interface.
It seems like this happens
Well, that would fit my experiences Jason.
Looking through a few other SUPs running 12.2SR they all seem to have
SanDisk CF in.
However the ones I have running 12.2SX do not show the vendor of the
CF. Not sure whether that is IOS or CF related.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Jason Gurtz
Ours are SanDisk. They were sold to us by a vendor who assured us of the
compatibility.
--
Randy
www.FastServ.com
-- Original Message ---
From: Dan Holme dan.ho...@gmail.com
To: Jason Gurtz jasongu...@npumail.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:34:37
And the max capacity for a Sup720 is 1GB right, no 2GB and up modules
allowed?
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-
pkr...@unwiredltd.com
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Current Nexus 2148T doesn't support Etherchannel in the strictest sense (you
can do 2 port vPC down to the servers) or 100BASE-T. They are strictly
1000BASE-T only -- this may bite you if you need 100BASE-T management ports,
etc. Also keep in mind that the fabric extenders do not even perform L2
As of SXI 2GB Cisco CF is supported:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/release/notes/features.html#wp4208036
Issue with 3rd party vendor CF's is that each CF has an internal controller
that sits before the actual flash memory. Vendors change those internal
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Peter Kranz pkr...@unwiredltd.com wrote:
I have some CF 1 GB modules that are recognized on insert:
I have found these to work consistently on and old and new Sups:
SanDisk SDCFB-1024-A10 1GB CF Type 1 Card
For some reason, VS-S720-10G sups support a wider
Not necessarily directed at you Devin...
If you consider some of these design features an issue, I would recommend
getting with your account team and getting a NDA in place.
There will be some changes made very soon that will have a major impact on
the flexibility and general architecture of
35 matches
Mail list logo
