On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:41:07 +0530
jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I have been working on 7613 and 6500 devices implementations.But I
always have a confusion on -
CEF720 and DCEF720 cards.
1) how to identitify if the card is CEF720 or DCEF720
show module all will tell in
Hi,
Have DSL users terminating on LNS(7204) via Eth, with radius auth -
Trying to apply the following service policy(Configured on LNS) upon
successful auth:
policy-map JF-2MB-ADSL
class class-default
shape average 185
Using the following av-pair:
ip:sub-qos-policy-out=JF-2MB-ADSL
On 08.03.2010 07:26, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Hey all
What I am trying to figure out is, can I buy SmartNet (or something else)
where I can just get the 'Core Entitlements', and NOT any hardware, onsite or
engineers.
CON-SW is what you are looking for ... contact your friendly
neighborhood
What version of IOS code are you running?
Just in case this apples to you, note that the feature Per-user QoS
policies applied via RADIUS is broken in all versions of IOS 15.0, and
as far as I can tell, many versions of 12.4T including 12.4(15)Tx and
possibly earlier, on multiple platforms.
Quoting Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net:
What version of IOS code are you running?
12.4(24)T1
Just in case this apples to you, note that the feature Per-user QoS
policies applied via RADIUS is broken in all versions of IOS 15.0,
and as far as I can tell, many versions of 12.4T
Hi Keith,
as you're running a 7206VXR with NPE-G1 I assume the 3 other GigE you mention
are the onboard ones. Also 4/0 has to be a PA-GE if there's no newer PA
available I've missed.
As far as I remember a 7200VXR is 600 bandwidth points per bus, not 400.
But I think there's been something
Hi all,
Does anyone have an idea how many devices/clients can synchronise time to a
SUP720 C6500 module ?
How does it scale ? If i point 10, 100 , 1000, ... clients to a loopback
address on the supervisor ?
regards,
Geert
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
HI Everyone,
Good day to you.
I have some issues with our GSR 12012 router, kindly check the below log.
This log is taken just before i lost connection to my router. Can anyone
tell me what is wrong with our router.
I am also attaching the log after I hard reboot the GSR. Once i hard reboot,
I'm too stupid to make this work. :-)
What I'm trying is:
- NPE-G1 running 12.4(25c) Ent. IPSec 3DES (c7200-jk9s-mz.124-25c.bin)
- Configured as standard MPLS PE in our network
- Loopback-interface to terminate GRE tunnel on outside VRF
- Tunnel-interface in inside VRF
- No other interfaces
I'm deploying a Cisco 7200 series router. I've used ISRs in the past many
times, but have never touched any 7200 series (or non-ISR for that matter)
hardware.
Can anyone explain to me the purpose of the 12.2 images I see on CCO for
this device? These images seem to have a different naming and
Hello community,
I received a 7204VXR chassis with a I/O controler (no FE ports on it) et
plugged in it an old NPE-400 plus 2 PA-FE.
PA-FE 1 in in slot 1.
PA-FE 2 is in slot 2.
Upgraded my bootloader with c7200-boot-mz.120-22.S.bin and my version of IOS
is
my 2 cents
Cisco IOS Software Release 12.2(33)SRC
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps6970/ps1838/prod_presentation0900aecd8072c43a.pdf
El lun, 08-03-2010 a las 09:32 -0600, P C escribió:
I'm deploying a Cisco 7200 series router. I've used ISRs in the past many
times,
On 08/03/2010 15:32, P C wrote:
Can anyone explain to me the purpose of the 12.2 images I see on CCO for
this device? These images seem to have a different naming and numbering
scheme than that 12.4/15 images. Normally, if this was any ISR I would just
use 12.4T15(latest) as these seem to be
Nick Hilliard n...@inex.ie wrote:
Offhand no, but why on earth would you want to use a sup720 as an NTP time
server?
...because it is a box typically in the core of the network that is
probably already always available and sync'ed up to the world. No harm
in letting it distrubute the time
On 08/03/10 15:27, Peter Rathlev wrote:
I'm too stupid to make this work. :-)
What I'm trying is:
- NPE-G1 running 12.4(25c) Ent. IPSec 3DES (c7200-jk9s-mz.124-25c.bin)
- Configured as standard MPLS PE in our network
- Loopback-interface to terminate GRE tunnel on outside VRF
-
hardware issue: connector?
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.frwrote:
Hello community,
I received a 7204VXR chassis with a I/O controler (no FE ports on it) et
plugged in it an old NPE-400 plus 2 PA-FE.
PA-FE 1 in in slot 1.
PA-FE 2 is in slot 2.
This message prints every time this router boots that I am about to deploy.
The Ethernet is for Metro Ethernet, a PtP VLAN between 2 locations across
Qwest's QMOE cloud.
Config looks like this:
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
description QMOE service
no ip address
negotiation auto
!
Hello,
It's a possibility I have considered as it is a refurb chassis.
Any other ideas ?
Thanks.
Y.
2010/3/8 Manu Chao linux.ya...@gmail.com
hardware issue: connector?
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.frwrote:
Hello community,
I received a 7204VXR
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Peter Rathlev wrote:
crypto isakmp profile Crypto-Profile-TEST
vrf INSIDE-VRF
keyring Crypto-Keyring-TEST
match identity address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.255 OUTSIDE-VRF
initiate mode aggressive
!
not sure, but maybe you should put this profile in vrf OUTSIDE-VRF ?
As a datapoint, I was running NTP on ~315-340 devices against a
6500/sup2a for years before upgrading to a 720. Never had a problem. I
don't even think either sup noticed. :)
-porkchop
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hello Philip,
By default, the router boots with all its PA-FEs in shut down state.
I have tried to reboot several time (in shut down state), always the same.
Y.
2010/3/8 Philip Davis pda...@i2k.com
What happens if you boot with F1/0 configured for a shutdown state?
On 3/8/2010 10:42 AM,
Youssef,
You've answered your own question- you have a bad slot 1. Check to see
if there are any bent pins in it/make sure the PAs actually seat
properly in it. ITMT, avoid using slot 1 to prevent further reloads.
/eninja
When I remove the PA-FE from slot 1 or insert it in another slot
On 08/03/10 16:32, james edwards wrote:
This message prints every time this router boots that I am about to deploy.
You didn't say which message but I'm guessing you mean the Use a /31 on
a non-ptp carefully
We use /31 on ethernet p2p on 6500/sup720 extensively. It works fine,
we've had no
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:47 +0200, John Kougoulos wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Peter Rathlev wrote:
crypto isakmp profile Crypto-Profile-TEST
vrf INSIDE-VRF
keyring Crypto-Keyring-TEST
match identity address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.255 OUTSIDE-VRF
initiate mode aggressive
!
not sure,
(Hit the send key combo a little too fast, continuing)
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:33 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
In the mean time I found this article:
http://blog.ioshints.info/2009/09/encrypting-p-to-p-router-traffic.html
As I read that article, it suggests that MPLS and IPSec don't mix. I'm
Cisco specs lists the following for ME3400 with METROIPACCESS feature set:
IP routing: Static, RIP versions 1 and 2, EIGRP, OSPF, BGPv4, PIM-SM,
and PIM-DM (metro IP access only)
IPv6: MLD Snooping v1 and v2
IPv6: RIP, OSPFv3, static routes
Hello,
As I sais in my first post, I had to upgrade the bootloader because it
was too old but the slot was perfectly working then. This is why it's
bugging me so much...
I'll check the backplane for any Bent pins but still...
Y.
Le 8 mars 2010 à 18:29, Eninja eni...@gmail.com a écrit
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:02 +0100, Manu Chao wrote:
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
But ethernet isn't point-to-point, so RFC 3021 doesn't cover it. It
might work, but it isn't standardised.
--
Peter
___
cisco-nsp
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Marcus.Gerdon wrote:
|-Hi Keith,
|-
|-as you're running a 7206VXR with NPE-G1 I assume the 3 other GigE you
mention are the onboard ones. Also 4/0 has to be a PA-GE if there's no newer PA
available I've missed.
|-
|-As far as I remember a 7200VXR is 600 bandwidth points per
The PA-FE is Wellington recognized if I recall correctly...
I'll try it again and see just to be sure.
Y.
Le 8 mars 2010 à 18:39, Buhrmaster, Gary g...@slac.stanford.edu a
écrit :
When PA-FE1 is in slot1, the router loops during boot and the
following
appears :
Have you tried
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.ukwrote:
On 08/03/10 16:32, james edwards wrote:
This message prints every time this router boots that I am about to
deploy.
You didn't say which message but I'm guessing you mean the Use a /31 on a
non-ptp carefully
On 8-3-2010 18:02, Manu Chao wrote:
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
And what with ospf and /31?
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 3/8/10 9:02 AM, Manu Chao wrote:
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
Cisco supports it fine, but not all vendors do. I don't have any
Foundry/Brocade stuff so this is secondhand, but someone on NANOG said
they didn't support /31's on Ethernet.
~Seth
Wow! That's a lot of encapsulation for each packet (Eth, GRE, MPLS,
IPSec)! I would suggest peeling back the layers to find where the
problem originates. Id pull each upper-layer encapsulation off entirely
and make sure the MPLS with GRE is working first. Then, if that works,
put the IPSec back
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
Yes, RFC 3021 is well supported on *actual* point to point links (e.g.
SDH/SONET). Ethernet is *not* such a type of link.
There are lots of people who use /31 on Ethernet links without any
apparent problems. However ...
Some of
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:32:54AM -0600, P C wrote:
I'm deploying a Cisco 7200 series router. I've used ISRs in the past many
times, but have never touched any 7200 series (or non-ISR for that matter)
hardware.
Can anyone explain to me the purpose of the 12.2 images I see on CCO for
Hello,
I'm using a 4506 as my core switch. This morning I noticed an issue with my
line card 3:
Switch#sh module
Chassis Type : WS-C4506
Power consumed by backplane : 0 Watts
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
Anyone know if:
WS-F6K-PFC3CXL=, Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Supervisor Engine 720 PFC-3CXL
Is a supported upgrade on a regular Sup720-3B?
--
Tim:
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:13:00 -0800, you wrote:
Cisco supports it fine, but not all vendors do. I don't have any
Foundry/Brocade stuff so this is secondhand, but someone on NANOG said
they didn't support /31's on Ethernet.
One platform that doesn't support it is PacketFront ASR routers.
AFAIK,
Ethernet is not designed for p2p but can be used for this purpose.
OSI allow any L3 over L2 Ethernet, there is no issue with IPv4 @
2010/3/8, sth...@nethelp.no sth...@nethelp.no:
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
Yes, RFC 3021 is well supported on *actual* point
A year ago i had seen a note about 15.0S coming out for 7600 at the end
of 2010.
--
Tassos
Gert Doering wrote on 08/03/2010 20:45:
Let me explain that. On the 7600, there is *only* 12.2SR* IOS, no
12.3/12.4/15.0 IOS, as the hardware is different from the general purpose
platforms, and
Ethernet is not designed for p2p but can be used for this purpose.
OSI allow any L3 over L2 Ethernet, there is no issue with IPv4 @
Sure. And we use Ethernet as point to point technology too. However,
that is an entirely different statement than saying that /31 is well
supported on Ethernet.
I agree, /31 well supported on carrier class router. As you say, rfc
may need an update for ethernet p2p
2010/3/8, sth...@nethelp.no sth...@nethelp.no:
Ethernet is not designed for p2p but can be used for this purpose.
OSI allow any L3 over L2 Ethernet, there is no issue with IPv4 @
Sure. And
On Mar 8, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
- on the platforms where you have a choice, go to the feature
navigator
(http://www.cisco.com/go/fn) and find an IOS version that has all
the
features that you want, and has *no letters* attached, and has a
high
number in
Bharath,
Your logs below suggest that these chain of events started with fabric/
active RP problems.
What does a 'sh contr fia' look like from the RP and an attach session
to all LCs? Also, what do the logs say now?
Finally, what changes were made to this device prior to all the errors?
Yep it is, see
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/release/notes/ol_14271.pdf
page 44,
or
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/hardware/Config_Notes/78_16220.html
-pavel
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/03/2010, at 5:36 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Some of us have tried (hard) to get Cisco and Juniper to come forward
with an official statement about whether /31 is supported or not on
Ethernet links. We have been entirely unsuccessful - the answer we
receive is always of the type try
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:43:57PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Mar 8, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
- on the platforms where you have a choice, go to the feature
navigator
(http://www.cisco.com/go/fn) and find an IOS version that has all
[..]
Feature Navigator is
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 10:34 -0800, Leah Lynch (Contractor) wrote:
Wow! That's a lot of encapsulation for each packet (Eth, GRE, MPLS,
IPSec)!
It's a brave new world. :-) Having the configuration on a standard PE in
our core greatly simplifies the routing and configuration. And the
GRE-in-IPSec
I tested this scenario some time ago. As I recall, it is possible to use
tunnel protection on one side of the tunnel and the usual crypto map
statements on the other end for GRE over IPSec.
If the issue is the application of the crypto map statements on the PE
end, try setting up a lab scenario
Hey all,
Got kind of a design problem I'm working on, trying to see what my
options are. Gonna have a site with dual 7206, both with full tables, doing
iBGP between. Each 7206 will have (2) links going to upstream, all (4)
links in same remote AS. Both routers have a 50 meg circuit for
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:13:00AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 3/8/10 9:02 AM, Manu Chao wrote:
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
Cisco supports it fine, but not all vendors do. I don't have any
Foundry/Brocade stuff so this is secondhand, but someone on
On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
For mainstream platforms (7200, not NPE-G2) with mainstream IOS
versions
(few letters), I have found it to be quite useful.
Oh, I certainly find it to be useful. But compare 12.4(18c) (which is
what TAC sent me last year for a IOS security
No its not..
PFX-3CXL is only supported on the Sup720-10GE supervisor.. Sup720-3B can
take a PFC-3BXL, PFC-3B or PFC-3A
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-
pkr...@unwiredltd.com
-Original Message-
From:
Peter,
The VRF statement in the ISAKMP profile does refer to the inside VRF . In
other words, its the VRF the decrypted packets are placed in. Since these
packets are GRE encapsulated in your case, it has to match the vrf that the
tunnel iinterface is using to build the gre tunnel (tunnel vrf
Joerg Mayer replies
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:13:00AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 3/8/10 9:02 AM, Manu Chao wrote:
You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;)
Cisco supports it fine, but not all vendors do. I don't have any
Foundry/Brocade stuff so this is
It's supported by Cisco on the VS-720 (Sup720-10GE) engine as well as the
7600 RSP720, not the original Sup720:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/Hardware/12.2SR_supported_hw/7600_hwd.html#wp1030645
--
Stephen F. Cobb • Senior Sales Engineer, CCNA/CCDA/DCNID/CSE
Telecoast
Hope this helps:
IPv6 BGP-related features (with METROIPACCESS) on the me-3400's at the
moment, according to Cisco:
Multicast BGP
IPv6 Multicast: Address family support for multiprotocol BGP - iBGP/eBGP
IPv6 Routing: multiprotocol BGP extensions for IPv6
IPv6 Routing: multiprotocol BGP
Daniel-
Depending on IOS, start by issuing the command show diagnostic results mod
3 and look for any tests that have failed. If you do see any failed tests
(F's), try re-seating the module. Software's most likely not the issue since
you've got the same blade, online and fine. If the test fails
Hi Eninja,
Thanks for your reply.
Kindly check the below finding from the router you asked for. I didn't do
anything, i just leave it lyk that for 45 mins after i loose connection.
After 45 mins i got the connection back, but all the LC's are restarted
according to log.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Tested this on one ME3400:
Upgraded to latest SW, changed my SDM and enabled IPv6 and BGP.
Cisco IOS Software, ME340x Software (ME340x-METROIPACCESSK9-M), Version
12.2(53)SE, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
System image file is flash:/me340x-metroipaccessk9-mz.122-53.SE.bin
router bgp 1
no bgp
62 matches
Mail list logo
