Had the idea of testing LAM to support an application without resorting to
inter-datacenter bridging(*) (Vmotion in this case) ,
Astonished to find the documentation old and out of date, coupled with a
lack of vrf support (no redistribute mobile in the VRF BGP context) ,
Can't seem to find
On 10/08/2010, at 5:43 PM, David Freedman wrote:
Can't seem to find anything suggesting a feature which could quite easily be
a superb alternative to bridging is even remotely vrf aware.
Any advice/pointers appreciated.
1. OTV
I should have mentioned that my target trains are 12.2SX and 12.2SR :)
1. OTV
http://www.ciscosistemi.net/en/US/prod/switches/ps9441/nexus7000_promo.html
2. EoMPLSoGRE
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_
c11_493718.pdf
Great, but both layer 2
David Freedman david.freed...@uk.clara.net wrote:
Had the idea of testing LAM to support an application without resorting to
inter-datacenter bridging(*) (Vmotion in this case) ,
Astonished to find the documentation old and out of date, coupled with a
lack of vrf support (no redistribute
[i had replied to David off list but it seems his reply to me was bcc'd here.
so to keep things relevant i'm posting the reply here too]
On 10/08/2010, at 6:53 PM, David Freedman wrote:
I should have mentioned that my target trains are 12.2SX and 12.2SR :)
6500/7600 are capable of
On 10/08/2010, at 6:35 PM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
I was toying with the idea internally of putting a tiny OSPF router into
our VM cluster to drag IP's from one side of our organisation to the
other.
reality is that many hosts and applications require and expect layer 2
connectivity for
I'm using 4.1(3)N2(1) and the log option is not available.
Should i guess an upgrade is needed, although release notes do not
mention anything?
--
Tassos
Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote on 10/08/2010 12:43:
Tassos,
Looking here:
g'day,
The only remaining question is why for it's money have VMWare not done
the trivial task of making OSPF part of their VMotion malarkey...*sigh*
because its not /quite/ as simple as you suggest.
The awkward part I see is host based (not service) L3 connectivity. The
operating
Hi,
* Lincoln Dale l...@cisco.com [2010-08-10 19:56:21+1000]:
On 10/08/2010, at 6:35 PM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
I was toying with the idea internally of putting a tiny OSPF router into
our VM cluster to drag IP's from one side of our organisation to the
other.
reality is that
Seems to be in 4.1(3) too...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/command
/reference/rel_4_1/security_cmd_ref.html#wp1279114
Strange...
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
i believe the common case is that vCenter today 'forces' all hosts in
a 'cluster' to be in a common L2 domain, although i read something
somewhere that said that it can be overruled. i haven't found the
nerd knob to set that if there is such a thing. but even if there is
such a nerd knob,
n5k(config-acl)# deny ip any any ?
CR
dscpMatch packets with given dscp value
fragments Check non-initial fragments
precedence Match packets with given precedence value
n5k(config-acl)# deny ip any any log
^
% Invalid ip address at '^' marker.
A friend of mine suggests that all linecards should have the same DFC (3C,
3CXL, 3B etc...), else the port channel might not work properly.
In our case, all of the linecards are DFC3B no service modules will be
used so I believe it should be ok.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
* Lincoln Dale l...@cisco.com [2010-08-10 20:46:53+1000]:
The only remaining question is why for it's money have VMWare not done
the trivial task of making OSPF part of their VMotion malarkey...*sigh*
because its not /quite/ as simple as you suggest.
The awkward part I see is
Hi,
* David Freedman david.freed...@uk.clara.net [2010-08-10 12:01:16+0100]:
i believe the common case is that vCenter today 'forces' all hosts in
a 'cluster' to be in a common L2 domain, although i read something
somewhere that said that it can be overruled. i haven't found the
nerd
Yo, the WS-6148-GE-TX does not support large frame. You need the WS-6748
for large frame !
And i believe you have a sup32, well that doesnt support large frame either,
unless it's a sup32-10GE.
Maybe you could use 1 port for each VLAN, that way you don't need the 4
bytes header from 802.1Q
-
here it is:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/configuration/guide/intrface.html#wpmkr1044296
have fun.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Dan Voyer danvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yo, the WS-6148-GE-TX does not support large frame. You need the WS-6748
for large
On 10/08/10 12:15, Rin wrote:
A friend of mine suggests that all linecards should have the same DFC (3C,
3CXL, 3B etc...), else the port channel might not work properly.
I don't see why (modulo the different QoS stuff I mentioned). We do port
channels with one member on a 6716 and one on
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetailsbugId=CSCth28899
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetailsbugId=CSCth28899State:
New
Severity: Enhancement
Version: 4.2(1)N1(1)
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:09 AM,
yes. it works, thank you
but I have to type every time. How can I save configure?
ls it possible I can use the GUI to connect?
Thank you
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Gabriel jarod...@gmail.com wrote:
vpnc
On Aug 9, 2010 9:07 PM, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Can
On 09/08/2010, at 5:47 PM, Rin wrote:
We are building a Core network of 3 7609 routers connecting as a 40Gbps
ring. On each router we have 4 WS6704 linecards. Each router will be
connected to other routers via 4 10G-links, these links will be configured
as Port-Channel.
The use of 6704
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 08:13:37AM -0400, Dan Voyer wrote:
Yo, the WS-6148-GE-TX does not support large frame. You need the WS-6748
for large frame !
6148 does not support jumbo frames, 6148A does.
Everton
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Not to side step the original question, but I see this kind of discussion
frequently. This is another example of where the network can be made to
solve a problem that it's best leaving up to a higher-level mechanism.
In this case, if you have multi-site fault tolerance requirements between N
Hi list,
Does someone have experience with erspan on a 7600?
Is this loading the CPU (rsp720 / ws-x6748-ge-tx) or is it handled in
hardware?
Martin
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Im not sure if it helps, but I remember having a lot of trouble back doing
DSL stuff - similar issues. There was a command: 'ip tcp mss-adjust' or
something similar - might be worth having a look at..
On 8 August 2010 12:02, Marco Matarazzo marm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
was trying to
Hi,
there exists network-manager plugin for vpnc. Never used it though.
Best regards,
Jan
On 08/10/2010 02:54 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
yes. it works, thank you
but I have to type every time. How can I save configure?
ls it possible I can use the GUI to connect?
Thank you
On Mon, Aug
Hi Martin,
ERSPAN is handled by the hardware, either the central replication
engine on the sup, or by the REs on the linecards themselves (depends
on which sup LCs you have).
In no case do we use the sup CPU to perform ERSPAN encap/decap.
Tim
At 07:10 AM 8/10/2010, Martin Moens averred:
Thanks Tim,
Exactly what I wanted to hear :-)
Martin
Tim Stevenson mailto:tstev...@cisco.com wrote on 10/08/2010 16:59:
Hi Martin,
ERSPAN is handled by the hardware, either the central replication
engine on the sup, or by the REs on the linecards themselves (depends
on which sup LCs you
network-manager-vpnc
in the ubuntu repos.
little buggy. in my experience, no one client works for all profiles
or vpn endpoints. shrewsoft, kvpnc, and nm-vpnc all are used on my
system.
ynmv.
q.
-= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =-
On Aug 10, 2010, at 9:57, Jan
Yes, it seems that ACL logging is not yet support on N5K, and CSCth28899
is there to track its introduction (no timeframe yet...)
I am checking why the command reference shows as if it is supported...
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
On 23/07/2010, at 9:45 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Cisco has posted sxi4a.
Has anyone identified any early issues with sxi4a ?
Thanks
David
...
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 2:47 AM, bas wrote:
And now imagine if I were a bad guy that has control over 50 compromised
servers in networks that do not filter
outbound spoofed traffic.
We don't have to imagine it; this is
we just upgrade one of our core 6509 / 3bxl to this code a few days
ago and so far no problem; you're probably looking for feedback on the
the 7600 platform though.
--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS
--
On 8/10/10 4:28 PM, David Hughes wrote:
What about software switched traffic (mostly glean traffic)?
Doesn't that get handled by the RP?
Mack McBride
Network Engineer
Viawest, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Stevenson
Sent: Tuesday,
Can anyone confirm that IPv6 ACLs successfully match packets on upper
layer protocols (ULP) such as TCP even when the Hop-by-Hop EH (extension
header) is present?
I found some information regarding matching ULPs when the AH extension
header is present but have been unable to do the same for the
N7K supports ACL logging, ACL time ranges, MAC packet-classify functionality
etc., N5K does not currently support them.
the mistake is that documentation was carried over to N5K from N7K without
being changed.
cheers,
lincoln.
On 11/08/2010, at 5:58 AM, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
Yes,
36 matches
Mail list logo
