On 20 Aug 2010, at 17:57, christopher.mar...@usc-bt.com wrote:
Regardless of what the UI appears to be doing, you can't do gigabit without
autonegotiating.
Yes, you can do gig without autoneg. That doesn't make it a good idea, but it
certainly works.
Nick
I would mirror desired ports in the switch(LAN, WAN)hook up a PC and
run wireshark. Make a call from/to the wireless clients and capture
the data, in the SIP Invite scroll down to the SDP, you will see the
IP address used for the RTP stream, also you should see you will see
the flow there.
Ensure
Hello there,
One more idea would be try and check your asterisk.
There should be a sip_nat.conf file where you should put your internal
and external iphone address.
If I understand correctly, your internal wifi customers are
communicating with your asterisk with no nat, so go ahead to this file
Please elaborate.
How do you manually configure which end of the link is master for clocking
purposes?
Sorry for top-posting. Sent from my clunky phone interface.
/chris
Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 20 Aug 2010, at 17:57, christopher.mar...@usc-bt.com wrote:
Regardless of what
Andrew said:
On 20/08/2010, at 5:57 PM, christopher.mar...@usc-bt.com wrote:
Two mentions of problems with manually configured gigabit operation.
Is there really a problem in that scenario? Shouldn't be.
Regardless of what the UI appears to be doing, you can't do gigabit without
There is no such thing as gigabit half duplex, both link partners
transmit on all four pairs simultaneously. So there can't be a duplex
mismatch when running at gig. Auto-negotiation has to happen to link up
at 1000. If you set a port to 1000 the phy is configured to not
advertise 10/100 but it
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:42, Jim Getker (getker) get...@cisco.com wrote:
There is no such thing as gigabit half duplex
Actually, the IEEE specifications allows for 1000/half
(to support gigabit hubs). That I have never seen a
gigabit hub is not relevant to the capabilities one must
build into
Hi Gary,
By bad, you are correct it is in 802.3.
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Gary Buhrmaster [mailto:gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 1:08 PM
To: Jim Getker (getker)
Cc: christopher.mar...@usc-bt.com; and...@2sheds.de;
My years-long quest to get a pair of GEIP+ boardsets has finally come to
fruition. However, I have one question.
Does the GEIP+ support 1000BASE-T GBICs? I don't need it to be eligible
for Cisco support; I just need it to work.
Failing that, does the C4912G support 1000BASE-T GBICs?
This may be of interest to you
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/ts/fn/100/fn13030.html
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Sridhar Ayengar ploops...@gmail.comwrote:
My years-long quest to get a pair of GEIP+ boardsets has finally come to
fruition. However, I have one question.
Does the GEIP+
My years-long quest to get a pair of GEIP+ boardsets has finally come to
fruition. However, I have one question.
Does the GEIP+ support 1000BASE-T GBICs? I don't need it to be eligible
for Cisco support; I just need it to work.
Failing that, does the C4912G support 1000BASE-T GBICs?
Suppose a CE is connected to an MPLS network that has 6 hops between the PE
this said CE connects to and the edge of the MPLS network. If a user traces
from behind the CE through the MPLS network, is it possible to hide all the
hops in between?
___
On 8/21/2010 8:19 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Suppose a CE is connected to an MPLS network that has 6 hops between the PE
this said CE connects to and the edge of the MPLS network. If a user traces
from behind the CE through the MPLS network, is it possible to hide all the
hops in between?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/command/reference/mp_m1.html#wp1013846
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
Suppose a CE is connected to an MPLS network that has 6 hops between the PE
this said CE connects to and the edge of the MPLS network. If a
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/switch/command/reference/swi_m2.htm
l#wp1058956
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 8:20
no mpls ip propagate-ttl
:-)
Best regards,
Mario
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:20 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Hiding MPLS L3VPN hops
16 matches
Mail list logo
