Re: [c-nsp] SXI4a or SXI5

On 14-11-10 05:26, Randy McAnally wrote: For the record, the upgrade from SXF to SXI5 was smooth and painless. Upgraded standby, failed over, reboot primary, back to SSO. Please note, according to release notes, you are supposed to upgrade rommon of your 67xx blades to at least 12.2(18r)S1.

[c-nsp] RSVP and TE bandwidth management

Hi all I need to know if RSVP supports over-provisioning of TE tunnels on links or there is CAC mechanism ? can the current reservation on a single link exceed maximum-bandwidth also if auto-bw adjustment isn't enabled , is the signaled BW is reserved for good even if no traffic load uses the

[c-nsp] 65xx/76xx ROMMON Firmware Was: Re: SXI4a or SXI5

On 11/14/2010 5:13 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: On 14-11-10 05:26, Randy McAnally wrote: For the record, the upgrade from SXF to SXI5 was smooth and painless. Upgraded standby, failed over, reboot primary, back to SSO. Please note, according to release notes, you are supposed to upgrade

Re: [c-nsp] 65xx/76xx ROMMON Firmware Was: Re: SXI4a or SXI5

On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:12 PM, ML wrote: On 11/14/2010 5:13 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: On 14-11-10 05:26, Randy McAnally wrote: For the record, the upgrade from SXF to SXI5 was smooth and painless. Upgraded standby, failed over, reboot primary, back to SSO. Please note, according to

[c-nsp] VSS and 3560, convergence measurement

Hello, list. We have VSS 1440 and we try to measure convergence time when we pull one of the copper links from 3560 (Etherchannel, PAgP, desirable-desirable, we also tried on-on). We do it by sending ping -f -i 0.1 -W 0.1 IP from the Linux station: Linux -- [3560] === [VSS] === [4948] --- IP

[c-nsp] DC power supplies for Cat3560X/Cat3750X

Hi I'm looking for information will Cisco offer DC (-48V) power supplies for their new Catalyst 3560-X and 3750-X switches. If yes when these DC PS will be available ? We currently using a lot of 3560-E series equipped with DC power supply and want continue this path using new -X series switches.

Re: [c-nsp] SXI4a or SXI5

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka grzeg...@janoszka.pl wrote: Please note, according to release notes, you are supposed to upgrade rommon of your 67xx blades to at least 12.2(18r)S1. However unintentionally we had some blades running earlier rommon and SXI with no problems

Re: [c-nsp] RSVP and TE bandwidth management

Hi, On 15 November 2010 03:53, Ibrahim Abo Zaid ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all I need to know if RSVP supports over-provisioning of TE tunnels on links or there is CAC mechanism ? can the current reservation on a single link exceed maximum-bandwidth No, you can not overbook the

Re: [c-nsp] SXI4a or SXI5

Only a guess, but I'd probably say they didn't test new code with old rommon so they can't guarantee something won't go wrong. I've seen plenty of times where it will work perfectly fine forever, but if they never tested it they don't want to make people believe it will work as advertised. On

Re: [c-nsp] SXI4a or SXI5

On 11/14/2010 5:23 PM, Pete Lumbis wrote: Only a guess, but I'd probably say they didn't test new code with old rommon so they can't guarantee something won't go wrong. I've seen plenty of times where it will work perfectly fine forever, but if they never tested it they don't want to make

Re: [c-nsp] SXI4a or SXI5

Where amongst the new-fangled download manager can we find the latest ROMMON's for these cards, and in fact those also for the sup720 on the 7600? I was off looking for ROMMONs for the sup720 last night, and it seems that many of the files for the 7600 are sprinkled amongst the 6500 software

Re: [c-nsp] SXI4a or SXI5

Hi, On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:41:21AM +1100, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Where amongst the new-fangled download manager can we find the latest ROMMON's for these cards, and in fact those also for the sup720 on the 7600? Call TAC... gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!