I'm not sure I really care about all the features. From the pricing I saw
it's dirt cheap for what it does. I just want something that operates close
enough to a real switch that I can use it in a LAN environment and not
become a human FAQ.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Mark Tinka
Hi.
I'm looking at the new 3600X series it was just released in Sept. I noticed
the no local switching for UNI ports. Is there a way to disable the UNI/NNI
relationship completely or enable local switching for UNI ports?
That might be true if you run the UNI-ports as switchports. OTOH you
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:56:22 pm Keegan Holley
wrote:
I'm not sure I really care about all the features. From
the pricing I saw it's dirt cheap for what it does. I
just want something that operates close enough to a real
switch that I can use it in a LAN environment and not
QOS can never be applied on Port Channels because they are logical interfaces.
The QoS on most Cisco Devices is done at the ASIC level and so it can only be
done on physical interfaces, the port channel will pass the packets to the
Physical Ifs and these in turn will apply the service policy on
We have a Customer with a 45-60 Mbps Constant Throughput from the internet on a
100Mbps link on a 2851 with 1GB of ram for the full Internet Routes + about 2K
internal Routes. We have one of these per each(2) ISP connection.
Jorge Rodriguez,CCNP-Voice
Senior Voice/Data Consultant
Netxar
08.12.2010 17:35, Ramcharan, Vijay A пишет:
Since you mentioned one subnet with static allocations from a portion of
that subnet I assume that you don't want the DHCP server handing out
your static allocations. You can configure exclusions (i.e. don't give
out these addresses) with ip dhcp
JFYI, all ports (with the exception of GigiabitEthernet0 which is the
management port and doesn't have uni/nni) on the ME3600X are defaulted to
nni in the running-config.
interface GigabitEthernet0
no ip address
shutdown
negotiation auto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
port-type nni
!
Yeah hence the ellipses and the recommendation to maybe look elsewhere.
:) It is definitely feature overkill for someone looking for a L2 switch
with ample fiber termination, but if you are dead set to go Cisco and do
not want something chassis based...
Phil
On 12/9/10 2:12 AM, Mark Tinka
Hello:
I have been going back and forth with Cisco TAC about Flexible Packet Matching
(FPM).
At the moment, I am trying to configure a nested class in the tcdf file. In
the future, I am interested in defining specific packet matches to drop. I
have read all documentation that I can find on
Thanks Gert, Joseph and Jorge.
We need to pass the full routing table to a customer who is load
balancing between us and another upstream provider.
As far as data throughput goes, yes, the 2911 looks like a good fit. But
I was concerned about whether the CPU would be able to handle the
Dennis,
I dont see ccenternat defined anywhere, though you are calling it in
the nested class thisone.
The XML DOES validate, but I believe you must define the class
ccenternet before you can match against ccenternat.
Hope this helps,
Rob
On 12/9/2010 11:13 AM, Dennis Bohn wrote:
Hello:
For faster convergence, our service provider suggested to disable the BGP
min advertisement interval (set it to 0).
Is this really a good idea, even as we receive the full Internet table ?
cheers, keti
**
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hi
When the bandwidth is high / spike, how can I be easy way to identify
the traffic coming from in cisco
In linux, I can run the iftop -i int
Thank you
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Enable netflow on the router and export it to a collector.
Here's a free one that's pretty.
http://www.plixer.com/
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Deric Kwok
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 12:43
QOS is generally applied on the input direction for port channels and that
works fine.
Output QOS is generally much more limited.
Ie. You can't do classification on output and those kinds of things.
This is very platform specific.
Mack McBride
Network Architect
-Original Message-
From:
A 2900 would cope fine with this, for sure.
Just for kicks I ran a full BGP feed to an 1841 one day a few years back
and after the initial onslaught of populating the routing table it coped
fine with the incremental BGP updates coming in after that.
Not that I would ever recommend it but
Gert,
I was just updated by the BU that this feature is now listed in FN...
Thanks
Arie
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 12:05
To: Arie Vayner (avayner)
Cc: Gert Doering; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp]
I generally use top-talkers for that.
ip flow-top-talkers
top 50
sort-by bytes
Then put ip flow ingress/egress on interfaces as needed.
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:43:03 +0100, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
When the bandwidth is high / spike, how can I be easy way to
-Original Message-
From: Per Carlson [mailto:pe...@hemmop.com]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 12:58 PM
To: George Manousakis
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Handling the inbound ACL's with dynamic pd ipv6
prefix from the ISP
But let's say now that you got
For faster convergence, our service provider suggested to disable the
BGP
min advertisement interval (set it to 0).
Is this really a good idea, even as we receive the full Internet table
?
the main benefit of MRAI in the Internet context is to reduce the number
of updates/withdraws
Hi George.
My suggestion is to put all those hosts with public accessible
services on one subnet, and all clients on another subnet. You can
then have different ACL's protecting the different subnets (allow any
- tcp/80 on the www-server subnet, deny any on the client subnet). If
you would
I need to start looking at replacing 3550-48 switches with something
comparable that supports ipv6. I tried using feature navigator, but the
info it was giving me was so suspect I won't even bother repeating it. My
impression from past looks into this issue is that the 3560-48TS (which
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:54:27PM +0100, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
I was just updated by the BU that this feature is now listed in FN...
Confirmed! HSRP for IPv6 is now listed for IOS XE 3.1S
thanks,
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
On 12/9/2010 12:54, Jon Lewis wrote:
I need to start looking at replacing 3550-48 switches with something
comparable that supports ipv6. I tried using feature navigator, but the
info it was giving me was so suspect I won't even bother repeating it.
My impression from past looks into this
On 09-12-10 22:22, Gert Doering wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:54:27PM +0100, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
I was just updated by the BU that this feature is now listed in FN...
Confirmed! HSRP for IPv6 is now listed for IOS XE 3.1S
Please pay attention whether this is HSRP on link-local
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:44:14PM +0100, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
On 09-12-10 22:22, Gert Doering wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:54:27PM +0100, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
I was just updated by the BU that this feature is now listed in FN...
Confirmed! HSRP for IPv6 is now
On (2010-12-08 17:39 -0800), Mack McBride wrote:
The misunderstanding is anything with a prefix longer than /88 includes
discarded bits in the subnet portion
as opposed to the host portion.
The missing bits are never/rarely going to lead to expected behaviour. Anything
more specific than
The 4948E may be a good fit but the full enterprise image is pricy.
It has better QOS and 1G/10G SPF+ uplinks.
Mack.McBride
Network Architect
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Thursday,
On (2010-12-09 23:59 +0200), Saku Ytti wrote:
Ugh.
The missing bits are never/rarely going to lead to expected behaviour.
Anything
more specific than /88 should just be used.
/just not/
deny tcp F00F::C7C9:0/120 eq www host 2001:DB8::1 eq 42 sequence 30
deny tcp
Agree but so does BFD in echo mode but echo also proves that the IP punt path
to the CPU is working. So not that I see no value in BFD but I do not see any
additional value of this mode over echo.
-Ben
On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
hi,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:40:51AM
On 12/09/2010 08:54 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
I need to start looking at replacing 3550-48 switches with something
comparable that supports ipv6. I tried using feature navigator, but the
We use the 3750s with IPv6 very satisfactorily. But as you suggest, they
probably won't meet your policing
Does anyone know of a way to make IOS see two distinct EIGRP processes (
Different ASNs ) equally. The standard behavior (On my version of IOS at
least) is to choose the route which was learned from the lower EIGRP ASN
regardless of metric. I can influence which routes are chosen by
manipulating
Hello.
Flash drives for XR on Cisco 12000 are quite expensive if bought from
Cisco. XR writes a lot to the drive so thus there are other requirements
than for running IOS which basically never writes to the drive at all.
What do people do out there? I found some industrial grade flash such
33 matches
Mail list logo
