Does the printer have a default gateway as in able to see outside its own
subnet? Can you ping/tracroute to it?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Quinn Kuzmich
Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 12:04 PM
To:
Hi, List!
I need to rate-limit traffic on two subinterfaces facing
a single customer. These two subifs used for building reliable
connection to the customer using OSPF and two links with
different vlans.
On Cisco 7600 it culd be done using aggregate policer and
one policy-map applied to two
Sorry I am pretty certain I total miss read this one. Split tunnelling will
only work if you specify what is and is not interesting traffic for the VPN and
local network.
Depending on what client you are using you can enable local lan access in
anyconnect (not certain if there is an option for
Hi Guys,
Testing an ASR1006-2960 portchan, and portchan comes up, config vlan int on
2960 in vlan 88 and portchan1.88 and can see mac's but cannot pass data - If I
change the config to bring down the portchan, and use physical interface on asr
with dot1q subint, I have no issues? Bug?
ASR:
On 28 March 2012 03:01, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:32:41 -0400
From: Renelson Panosky panocisc...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Local printer will not print when connected to Cisco
VPN client or
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not an obvious change from IOS to NX-OS. I'm also not sure
that this follows rfc3484 Default Address Selection for Internet
Protocol version 6
--
Tim:
Cisco has confirmed the NX-OS IPv6 stack does not implement
On 3/28/2012 9:00 AM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote:
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:23:55 +0300
From: Artyom Viklenko ar...@aws-net.org.ua
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 7201
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS Software
Traffic Optimization Features
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120328-mace
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 March 28 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Network Address Translation
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120328-nat
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 March 28 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software RSVP Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120328-rsvp
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 March 28 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Zone-Based Firewall Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120328-zbfw
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2012 March 28 16:00 UTC (GMT
On (2012-03-28 09:08 -0700), Chris Hunt wrote:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.310
encapsulation dot1Q 310
rate-limit input 1100 2062500 4125000 conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
rate-limit output 1100 2062500 4125000 conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
I would
On (2012-03-27 14:00 -0400), schilling wrote:
I am trying to have catalyst 6500 w/ sup720 3BXL with 12.2(33)SXI5 to
support ASBR exchanging VPN-IPv4, but 6500 is not allocating labels
for prefixes learned from eBGP over address family vpnv4.
Does anybody ever have this working? Any catch?
Thanks all for the advice. I figured out with TAC. The label is
filtered by my label advertisement filter.
Schilling
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2012-03-27 14:00 -0400), schilling wrote:
I am trying to have catalyst 6500 w/ sup720 3BXL with
Just resurrecting an old thread.
Anybody have any new information on Per-user QoS policies via RADIUS on 15.1?
I have a 1941 running 15.1(4)M1 that I'd like to accept the above, but
am unable to figure out the secret combo.
Thanks,
-c
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Reuben Farrelly
It works on 15.1M - at least on the 2800s and 7200s (I've got 15.1(4)M3
in production and planning 15.1(4)M4 which just came out a couple of
days ago).
The secret combo probably relates to how you are checking out the feature:
rt1.nsw#show subscriber session username xxx@yyy
Unique Session
Ah, that explains things. But for some reason all of my sessions do
not have an Inbound Policy map applied, only Outbound.
Snippit of debug:
RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 59
RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 53
ip:sub-qos-policy-in=512K_CIR-1536K_MIR-U
RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26]
On 28.03.2012 19:08, Chris Hunt wrote:
On 3/28/2012 9:00 AM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote:
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:23:55 +0300
From: Artyom Viklenkoar...@aws-net.org.ua
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
18 matches
Mail list logo
